Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Extra help to cut alcoholism

A Specialist service to help people overcome long-term drinking problems has been extended to cover the whole of Kirklees.

People heavily dependent on alcohol can have detoxification treatment at home to safely stop drinking, supervised by a specialist nurse.

Follow-up support is also provided.

Now more staff are being recruited by Lifeline Kirklees’ Alcohol Service to increase coverage from North Kirklees to the whole of the borough.

The development is part of a three-year action plan to reduce alcohol misuse and is funded by Kirklees Primary Care Trust.

Clr Khizar Iqbal, who chairs the Kirklees Safer Stronger Communities Partnership, said: “Agencies are working together to tackle alcohol misuse and new measures are being introduced to ensure Kirklees residents are safer and healthier.”

An extra alcohol liaison nurse has been recruited in Huddersfield to cover South Kirklees. In addition, two workers will offer the treatment from eight GP surgeries across North and South Kirklees.

Community detoxification treatment is part of a wider range of support and intervention offered by Lifeline Kirklees’ Alcohol Service for both harmful and dependent drinkers.

Another alcohol worker is also joining Lifeline Kirklees to support harmful drinkers – clients in the early stages of alcohol misuse – who do not need detoxifiication treatment but need practical help with reducing their consumption.

Tony Cooke, assistant director of Commissioning and Strategic Development for Drugs, Alcohol and Community Safety at Kirklees Primary Care Trust, said: “Reducing alcohol misuse and ensuring residents are healthier is a major priority. We are increasing treatment provision to help achieve this.”

The Kirklees Partnership Alcohol Strategy is seeking to expand treatment provision, increase awareness of sensible drinking levels and reduce alcohol-related health problems, anti-social behaviour and crime.

The community detoxification treatment programme was developed by Tricia Robinson, clinical nurse specialist, of Lifeline Kirklees, based in Dewsbury, who looks after clients in the north of the district.

She said: “Clients need this medical intervention when they reach a crisis point because of excessive drinking, for example, when their health has seriously deteriorated or their life is falling apart and they can’t function without alcohol.

“Detoxing and then staying sober is challenging. Alcohol is legal, widely available and socially acceptable. People have to work at developing skills to cope with the craving for alcohol once the detoxification is completed. It can take several attempts before someone achieves sobriety.”

Nurses assess if a client is suitable for the detoxification treatment and if it is safe to be administered at home.

The treatment comprises medication, lasting up to 10 to 14 days, which helps to combat withdrawal symptoms, including shaking, sweating, agitation, confusion and the risk of fits.

Hazel Ramsden, Alcohol Liaison Nurse, who has taken up her post in Huddersfield, said: “Staying sober and coping with sobriety is where the real challenge begins. And for that, there is no prescription.

“Clients review their lifestyle and develop new coping strategies. Learning to live without alcohol can require, for example, changing the way they socialise. Varying support is available, including groups and counselling. The client decides what’s right for them.

“We take a non-judgemental approach and urge people to return if they relapse rather than leave it until the problem escalates. In the long term, this treatment can be very successful, kickstarting clients into a new life free from alcohol.”

Huddersfield Daily Examiner

Big boozer, big loser

Raising taxes to make all alcohol more expensive is one way to curb Australia's booze problem, a visiting academic says.
Professor Robin Room said alcohol was too cheap and readily available from a public health point of view.

"If you want to seriously do something about alcohol in Australia, then raising taxes is a good way to do it," he said.

"From a public health point of view, the higher the better.

"It's a big problem, alcohol is responsible for a lot of health and social problems."

Prof Room, of the University of Melbourne school of population health, will address Tasmania's first annual conference on alcohol, tobacco and other drug issues in Hobart tomorrow.

Health Minister Lara Giddings opened the conference yesterday, announcing an alcohol action plan would be developed for the state.

She promised strategies to address alcohol consumption and binge drinking, particularly among young people.

"Binge drinking not only harms your health but can also lead to anti-social and dangerous behaviours which can harm others," Ms Giddings said.

"We need to reduce the number of young drinkers developing a lifelong pattern of hazardous drinking and alcohol-related health problems.

"We need to get the message out that drinking in moderation is the way to go."

Prof Room welcomed the Federal Government's decision to raise taxes on pre-mixed drinks, also known an alcopops.

He said regulation and laws worked better than public education campaigns.

"Trying to talk people out of something they enjoy is not a good bet," he said.

But Australian Hotels Association state general manager Steve Old said raising taxes would not address the issue of binge drinking.

However, he agreed binge drinking needed attention.

"We are excited that the minister has announced the development of an action plan on alcohol for our industry in Tasmania," Mr Old said.

"Only last week I wrote to Ms Giddings seeking a meeting on the issue of binge drinking and how we as an industry association in Tasmania would like to work with the Government on solving this problem."

Prof Room, who is also acting director of the Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre in Fitzroy, said alcohol was ingrained in Australian life.

"It's in every part of our life," he said. "Is it possible to flirt and have a good time with each other without being drunk?"

Mercury

Alcohol scanning hypocritical: CLP

The Northern Territory Government is confident new laws forcing people to show identification when buying takeaway alcohol will help control alcohol abuse.

Parliament has passed the legal framework for licensees in Katherine and Alice Springs to ask anyone buying alcohol to provide identification.

The electronic scanning system is still being rolled out but will show whether a person is restricted from buying alcohol.

The Minister for Alcohol Policy Chris Burns says it will limit problem drinkers' access to alcohol.

"This system will enable better enforcement of orders put through the alcohol courts, whether it be alcohol intervention orders or prohibition orders and I think it's also a good system to ensure that restrictions around products, say wine casks, one cask per person per day, can be enforced also."

The Territory Opposition says if the Government's serious about stopping problem drinkers buying alcohol it should use the system in Darwin.

The CLP's Matt Conlan says it is also hypocritical, given the Labor Government was opposed to people having to show identification under the former Howard government's federal intervention.

ABC News

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Alcoholics behind the wheel: Treating addiction

County DUI court program takes aim at repeat offenders

You drink. You drive. You get arrested but go on to drink and drive again.

And you get arrested again, and again, to the point that you face a state prison sentence of two or more years.

Some offenders in Lycoming County get one last chance to turn their lives around instead of heading to state prison. It’s the DUI Treatment Court, overseen by county Judge Dudley N. Anderson.

The DUI Treatment Court targets offenders who are about to be sentenced for their third, fourth, fifth and even sixth convictions for driving under the influence. It is their last chance, but one they choose to take voluntarily.

According to Anderson, people who are admitted to DUI Treatment Court are not being given an easy ride.

“We go over applicants and decide who is going to be admitted to the program,” he said. “This is a little bit of a carrot-and-stick method.

“The carrot is that there are mandatory sentences for driving under the influence, and we give them a portion of their sentence and they can get part of that on electronic monitoring, instead of the full term in jail.”

In exchange, the offenders agree to a rigorous alcohol intervention program. Once admitted into the program, Anderson and the court don’t let go.

Phases to treatment

“There are three phases to DUI Treatment Court,” Anderson explained. “Each of the phases is a minimum of four months long, and during the first four months, they have to go through intensive treatment.

“They do 90 in 90 —that’s 90 meetings with Alcoholics Anonymous in 90 days. They do counseling, a number of other interventions that are directed toward treatments, and they come to DUI Court every other week.”

In the second phase, those in the program must attend the same meetings, but for only four days a week over the next four months.

“During that time, they have to meet all the conditions of their supervision, including having all costs and fines paid, completing their community service, and they have to be employed to progress to Phase Three,” Anderson said.

In that final phase, those who are admitted to the program transition to regular supervision.

“They are under supervision for five years total,” he said. “They only have to come to court once every fourth week, and their curfews are relaxed. During the first phases, they have a curfew when they have to be home, the hours depending on their work schedule.”

During that time, they are still prohibited from frequenting bars or “places that are dedicated to alcohol,” Anderson said.

“We also start to give them responsibilities in court,” Anderson said.

“In some instances, we ask them to help another member in the program.”

Watchful eye

They also go to counseling and are subject to unannounced inspections at their homes as long as they are in the DUI Treatment Court program. Anderson said that includes inspections at almost any time, even on weekends and holidays.

If an enrollee is caught drinking or violating other terms of their probation, they are sent back to square one in the program. Violations also include missing any of the meetings or counseling sessions they are required to attend.

“At least once per month, we will send probation officers out at odd hours, like Sunday afternoon or late Saturday night and make sure they are there,” Anderson said.

“We will target certain individuals who we think have a propensity toward difficulty in this program.”

No quitting

But they aren’t allowed to just quit, even though the requirements are tough.

“Once you sign on, you cannot voluntarily be released from the program,” the judge said.

“You can’t resign. The reason for that is you’ve given your quid pro quo — it is our benefit by apportioning your time on electronic monitoring and now it is payback time.”

There are just two ways to get out of DUI Treatment Court — to successfully graduate the program or to go to state prison.

“That doesn’t mean we don’t have people who drink,” Anderson said.

“We have some who are pretty hard-core alcoholics, and some of them are in the program for two years or more.”

They get pushed back and have to start all over again, and that leaves a big impression on them, he said.

“Some who violate it usually do so with unprescribed medication or alcohol,” Anderson said.

“They may have to go to jail for a while, but then they have to start all over again.”

Eventually, repeat violators are locked up. But Anderson recalled only three that took that route.

Along the way, participants who do well are sometimes given small rewards, such as small gift cards, a relaxation of their curfew for special events, or abatement of some time on community service.

High success rate

The program until recently had no graduates reoffend, Anderson said.

“We just had a graduate who got picked up for another DUI and, until that, we hadn’t had anyone who graduated and gotten another DUI,” he said.

“That’s out of 60 graduates in three years, so that’s a pretty good success rate.”

Williamsport SunGazette

Drive-through beer vendor stirs concern

The addition of beer to the drive-through menu at a Clive restaurant has some concerned about the effects it might have on the number of people drinking and driving.

"We're worried about it, but what are we going to do about it?" Clive Police Lt. Gary Walker said.

The Clive City Council granted Iowa Castle owner Ray Alehy a license to sell beer and wine coolers at his restaurant at the last council meeting. The vote was unanimous, but not without discussion.

"This kind of thing concerns me," said Councilman Scott Cirksena before placing his vote. "It may be legal, but it does give me concern."

In the end, the council conceded that there was no reason not to grant the license.

Drive-up liquor sales are not unheard of in Iowa, said Lynn Walding, administrator of the state alcoholic beverages division. As of February, the department had tallied 14 establishments in the state that sold liquor from drive-through windows, including a liquor store in Des Moines. Iowa Castle's situation is unique because it is the first fast-food restaurant to be granted a license in the state, he added.

Although the setup seems to promote drinking and driving, Walding said so far it hasn't been a problem in Iowa.

"To date, we've not had a complaint over any of those establishments," he said.

Patrons of the restaurant have mixed feelings about the beer sales. On Saturday, Jennifer and Doug Cook of Johnston enjoyed a beer inside the restaurant. On Friday night, three customers bought beer at the drive-through.

"I think it's convenient just to get a quick bite to eat and have a drink," Jennifer Cook said.

She added about the drive-through sales: "I think that's definitely not a good idea."

Alehy said he has taken several measures to keep his restaurant and patrons in accordance with the law:

• The restaurant's drive-through is open until 3 a.m. on Friday and Saturday, but beer sales will stop at 1:45 a.m. to stay in accordance with a state law that prohibits the sale of alcohol after 2 a.m.

• Patrons must purchase food to be able to buy beer. State law requires that the restaurant have at least 50 percent plus $1 of its sales in prepared foods to be able to continue to allow minors on the premises.

• Patrons who appear intoxicated will not be sold beer inside the restaurant or at the drive-through.

• All patrons who purchase beer will be carded, and their driver's license will be scanned for authenticity. Those purchasing beer at the drive-through can buy a limited number of beers, an effort to ensure that they are not providing alcohol to minors in the vehicle.

• All beer sold in the restaurant and drive-through is in unopened bottles.

Iowa law prohibits drivers or passengers from possessing an open or unsealed bottle, can, jar or other receptacle containing an alcoholic beverage in the passenger area of a motor vehicle.

"We are not promoting drunk driving in any shape or form," Alehy said. "They have to use their judgment when they are purchasing the items; we need to use our judgment when we sell the items."

Despite Alehy's precautions, there is still concern that some patrons may make the wrong choice, especially since the restaurant is located near clubs and bars along 86th Street.

"We'll be particularly alert when people are driving through at 2 (a.m.) and thereafter," said Clive Police Chief Robert Cox.

"Alcohol and vehicles can be a deadly combination," said Misty Moyse, national Mothers Against Drunk Driving director of communications. "MADD's concern with establishments selling alcohol through a fast-food drive-through is the possibility of implied permission to drink alcohol while behind the wheel."

An April report by the Associated Press said the upper Midwest has the worst drunken-driving rates in the country, according to a government report that says 15 percent of adult drivers nationally report driving under the influence of alcohol in the previous year.

Iowa was ranked 14th.

The report on drunken driving relies on data obtained from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The survey asked 127,283 adults in 2004, 2005 and 2006 whether they had driven under the influence in the past year.

Clive police records show that the number of tickets issued for operating while intoxicated continues to rise each year. Drunken-driving reports went from 73 in 2004 to 102 in 2007.

"We'll have to keep an eye on it," Cox said.

Des Moines Register

Alcopops kapow!

With one swift blow, the Rudd Government has left the alcohol industry reeling after raising taxes on premixed spirits, or 'alcopops', by 70%. The measure is aimed at curbing binge-drinking among teenagers.

John Rogerson was still in bed when the call came yesterday morning. The head of the Australian Drug Foundation quickly realised his Sunday sleep-in would have to wait. On the phone was Senator Jan McLucas — parliamentary secretary for health in the Rudd Government. The news she delivered caught Rogerson, and the alcohol industry, by surprise. Taxes on pre-mixed spirits or "alcopops" would be raised by 70% — effective immediately.

The devastating toll of youth alcohol abuse would be curtailed by raising the price of drinks popular with teenagers. Binge drinking, and the industry accused of encouraging it, had been dealt a lethal blow.

For Rogerson, the personal call from the heart of Government marked a fundamental shift in the balance of power. McLucas' predecessor, Christopher Pyne, had held monthly meetings with the alcohol industry. But Rogerson, like many in a sector predicting a binge-drinking disaster, struggled to get an appointment.

Now they are being heard — and Australia's booze-soaked culture is being challenged at the highest level. Tough measures long called for by health experts are becoming policy. Kevin Rudd's latest bombshell comes just weeks after he announced a $53 million strategy to tackle alcohol abuse.

The message to the industry is clear — the party's over.

"We've been waiting a long time for this. It's the start of redressing the balance and making some significant inroads to changing the culture in our community and reducing the harm caused by alcohol misuse," says Rogerson.

The shock decision to raise taxes on alcopops — announced at midnight on Saturday — closes a loophole opened by the Howard government when GST was introduced in 2000. The taxation system for pre-mixed spirits was changed to attract a lower rate than more potent standard spirits. Thus, tax on a 5% strength can of bourbon and cola would mirror that on a can of beer of similar potency. It seemed a logical and just system.

But the industry was quick to exploit the loophole. The market was flooded with "super-strength" 7% and 9% products, containing two or three standard drinks in one can or bottle. With low taxes keeping prices down, the drinks attracted those on limited budgets, quickly becoming the tipple of choice for a generation of young drinkers.

In four years the number of female drinkers aged 15 to 17 consuming ready-to-drink beverages (RTDs) shot from 14% to 60%. And those who drank them were most at risk of alcohol-related harm. In 2004 among 14 to 19-year-olds who drank at dangerous levels, 78% of girls and 74% of boys preferred alcopops over any other drink.

The industry maintains that 80% of the RTD market is young men over 25 who drink spirits-based cola drinks. But an alcohol marketing insider recently confessed to The Age that companies were deliberately making stronger, sweetened drinks to appeal to young people who "like to get drunk faster."

In the past four years alone there has been a 36% increase in sales of RTDs — a boom that those in the industry fear will now come to an abrupt halt. As the tax on a litre of pure alcohol jumps from $39 a litre to $67, the consumer can expect to pay up to $1.30 more per bottle or can.

The new volumetric system — where spirits-based products are taxed according to alcoholic volume — means super-strength products could become too expensive for most drinkers. Indeed, just weeks ago three major breweries sniffed the wind, scrapping products with more than 7% alcohol, in a decision seen by many as a defensive move to fend off a government crackdown.

But Health Minister Nicola Roxon is not afraid to take on an industry that donates more than $7 million a year to political parties and contributes 2.5% of Australia's gross domestic product.

Roxon told The Age the Howard Government's decision to change taxation on pre-mixed spirits was a "mistake" that led to a rise in dangerous youth binge drinking. For Roxon, the business interests of the industry are "not really a factor" when it comes to health policy decisions.

"Of course they're stakeholders, and their views will be listened to in the same way that we'll look at the views that other people put forward in the community, but I really don't think that ultimately that's a key consideration for doing something where there's clear evidence that we might be able to protect young people," she said.

For those who see the first-hand effects of alcohol abuse, the Government's new focus on "evidence-based policy" is a welcome change. When Christopher Pyne was responsible for drug and alcohol issues he consistently denied that alcohol caused more harm than illicit drugs, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, including a death rate of three to one.

But will raising the cost of one range of alcoholic products really reduce youth binge drinking?

According to the Distilled Spirits Industry Council, it is a policy destined to fail. "All this tax is going to do is return teenagers to what they drank before 2000, which is beer and wine and wine-based mixed drinks," says spokesman Stephen Riden.

The $2 billion expected to be raised annually by the tax hike will be poured back into preventive health. But spirits producers say they are an easy target for a Government trying to raise revenue amid an economic downturn. "If they wanted to raise money for health prevention why not go for a tax that applies across all forms of alcohol below 10%, but that wouldn't have been nearly as politically popular because it would not have touched the hot button of youth binge drinking," says Riden.

A sharp rise in alcohol-related violence has raised public concern about binge drinking and new figures released yesterday show there is growing support for tough policies to change the culture. The National Drug Household survey showed one in three Australians want a reduction in licensed venues while one in four backed a price hike for alcohol. But the toughest policies — those proven to be the most effective — could be political suicide. Applying a volumetric tax to all alcohol products would increase the price of potent cask wine, popular with problem drinkers, but could also decimate the winemaking industry.

Daryl Smeaton, chief executive of the Alcohol Education and Rehabilitation Foundation, fears the Government won't take that risk: "More than 65% of MPs have a vineyard in their electorate. A volumetric tax on wine would have a major economic impact on those growers and I'm sure that would be taken very seriously by government."

Roxon says there are no immediate plans to introduce a volumetric tax across the board, but those in the alcohol and drugs sector are "quietly optimistic." For Roxon, any measure that will stop young people drinking themselves to an early grave, will be considered. "When you've got nearly 20,000 kids, girls 15 and under, who are drinking every single week then this is a huge problem, but if we act now we may be able to turn it around."

The Age

Monday, April 28, 2008

At least Ireland now recognises it has a drink problem

The Government's decision to implement legislation to regulate the sale and use of alcohol is winning widespread praise from those who deal with the fallout from alcohol abuse.

"Families can now close ranks and look at the real dangers of alcohol abuse," says Andrew Conway, senior clinical child psychologist with the Mater hospital.

"Our children are supposed to be our treasures, but what are we doing to protect them? The permission we give our children to drink is a national scandal.

"We need to deal with this urgently, because we're talking about a lot of children and the tremendously disabling brain disease of alcoholism, which robs a child and their family of the personhood of this child."

Like many people working with adolescents in the county, Conway recognises the value of this legislation."If we did not have new laws, the country would need a rash of treatment centres in 10 years' time to deal with the problem," he says.

Addiction counsellors will be the first to recognise the Government's vital step towards national recovery. Because when an alcoholic admits that they have a problem, they're more than half-way into the solution.

When a government recognises its country has a problem, it stands on the same ground. These new laws, and more to follow, bring hope -- a national campaign for recovery can begin. Of course, it's regrettable that the legislation has taken this long, but denial and resistance is the nature of the beast. Like an addict, the country needed to hit rock bottom before it was ready to face its problem.

Until now, those working with the negative consequences of alcohol abuse were managing upwards -- it was difficult to create awareness of the ill-effects of excessive drinking when our Government was colluding in the denial.

But that's over now. Every great journey begins with a first step. So where to from here?

Conway wants a well-funded prevention campaign across the board (health, justice and education). In particular, he'd like to see a huge improvement in recreational facilities in schools. "This will offer kids a resource they need, particularly the disadvantaged ones, who are going to off-licences after school," he says.

Standing on this, in terms of adult awareness, I would suggest a national advertising campaign targeting 30 to 50 year olds.

The advertisement showing a boy jumping off a building and smashing to the ground because he thinks he can fly is excellent for adolescents. But what about demonstrating the dark powers of alcohol for adults who, when they drink, think they too can fly?

What would we see if we televised a dinner table of adults getting drunk, or a group of parents with children nearby?

Last week a friend of mine told me about her drinking escapades in the Eighties -- which, on hindsight, she regrets.

A group of mothers would meet for a boozy lunch in a Dublin hotel and get the doorman to collect the children who would do their homework in the lobby while they got smashed next door. I didn't ask if cars were crashed as a result of these sessions, but I bet many little hearts crashed when they saw their withering mum on a bar stool.

"We didn't know the extent of the harm we were inflicting," she said. Which is understandable. Because when we're drinking, we don't see ourselves.

Far from it, we think all is well. That's the magic of booze -- it casts a spell. Because alcohol tells lies -- some are harmless and fun but others hurt how we want to see ourselves and behave towards those around us. A sensitive television campaign, informing not shaming, could be effective for a new national mental health programme.

The idea of a country in recovery from addiction is not new. Anne Wilson Schaef, a no-nonsense best-selling author, introduced this idea more than 10 years ago in her book, When society Becomes an addict.

It has had several editions since, but each book outlines the symptoms of a society that admits it's an addict and offers a programme on how that society can get well.

Introducing her subject, she says: "The good news is that, like the individual alcoholic/addict, an addictive system can recover. But before this can happen we must name and accept the disease. We must admit that the society we care about has a disease and can recover from that disease.

"We must also be willing to do the necessary work towards recovery. This is a long process that eventually requires a shift to a new system, one I call the Living Process System." Schaef recognises that addictions can be divided into two categories: substance addictions (alcohol, drugs, nicotine, caffeine and food); and process addictions (accumulating money, sports, gambling, sex, work and worry).

Her views on how to deal with them are controversial but thought-provoking.

She says an addicted society is a dishonest one and that its addictive system reveals itself in the three "ifs" of the individual addict -- 'If only', 'As if' and 'What if'.

Defining these addicts, Schaef says the 'if only' addict is dishonest about the past. The 'As if' addict is dishonest about the present, while the 'What if' addict is dishonest about the future.

For many working in the complex field of addiction, it's wholesome stuff. But, staying in the present, the Government legislation is the first and vital step for a national recovery programme.

It's great news.

Independent ie

Drunken driving laws need more attention

A troubling federal survey indicates that residents of Kansas and Missouri, compared to people in other states, face higher risks from drivers who’ve been drinking.

The National Survey on Drug Use and Health found that slightly more than 21 percent of Kansas drivers surveyed said they had driven while under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs. The Missouri figure was 18 percent.

The survey queried adult drivers in 2004, 2005 and 2006. They were asked if they had driven under the influence in the past year.

The questions did not specifically refer to drunken driving, which in most states is considered driving with a blood-alcohol content of .08 percent.

Because people self-reported their alcohol or drug use, federal officials say the percentages could be even higher than reported, with many drivers illegally intoxicated.

The findings show that states need to aggressively work to improve safety on the roads. They should:

-- Crack down on drunken driving with strict laws that discourage repeat offenses.
-- Fund prevention and treatment programs to combat alcohol and drug abuse.

-- Launch campaigns that encourage the use of designated drivers.

Even Utah, with the lowest percentage in the survey, had nearly 10 percent of drivers saying they drove while under the influence.

That’s frightening enough. But in some states it was considerably worse. In Wisconsin more than one-fourth of those surveyed reported that they had driven while under the influence.

North Dakota had nearly that many. Twelve states had percentages higher than Missouri.

Studies have found that drunken drivers are at least 13 percent more likely than sober ones to cause fatal crashes. However, even lower levels of alcohol can impair the ability to make safe decisions on the road.

Although alcohol-related traffic deaths have decreased in recent years due to the efforts of groups such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving, this survey shows that states need to continue to focus on the problem.

Midwest Voices

Sunday, April 27, 2008

It’s Not Just About Not Drinking

Q: Take a drunken horse thief and sober him up. What do you have?
A: A sober horse thief!

Q: Take a drunk, or an addict, sober/clean him up, what do you have?
A: A “dry” drunk/addict, still angry, dishonest, blaming, manipulative, scared, full of self-hatred, controlling, confused, resentful, and even more irritable because we took away the drug that helped to cover all of these feelings!

The “dry” drunk is just as difficult to live with as the drinking alcoholic, often more so. (By now, I hope everyone realizes we can interchange the words alcohol and drugs, alcoholic and addict). Why more difficult? When the drug is removed, voluntarily or forcibly, we are left with the real and raw person. The old pain, usually from childhood, surfaces. Without adequate tools to deal with old shame, fear, resentment, and anger, and the additional shame, fear, resentment and anger accumulated in years of drinking, drugging and wreaking havoc in adulthood, the dry drunk becomes irritable, restless, and discontent, and takes it out on everyone around him.

This is when real recovery can begin. Recovery is a process of looking at oneself, becoming honest with what we see, and deciding what parts we want to keep and what we want to change (the word amend means to change). We get to work toward being the person we were meant to be. When we take away the mind altering substances and processes, we get to become conscious and look at ourselves. No one can do this alone… not even you, my reader, who is insisting, “I can do it myself, I don’t need no stinking meetings.” Nope, no can do. Cannot change all alone and without help. An alcoholic alone is in horrible company, even a non-drinking alcoholic who has yet to change is not comfortable in his own head. The messages he gives himself are negative and repetitive. He is unable to see himself in any but the old way. His brain is stuck in old thinking; his behavior is based on old ways of looking at himself and others. This is why they make lots of recovering alcoholics who help each other see everything, including themselves, in a new way. It takes someone who has been there to truly see, and to help another see, who he is and what he does. Where are these recovering alcoholics who are ready, willing, and able to help someone beginning the journey of recovery? Hmmm. Maybe meeting together in a secret underground society to help each other maintain sobriety and encourage a new way of life.

Some people want additional help from professionals. It is always appropriate to seek help from a therapist, as long as the therapist does not collude with the alcoholic to use therapy alone and avoid meetings with others like him who have found recovery. Only another recovering alcoholic can completely, in his gut as well as his brain, understand and help by sharing his own experience. If it is working for him, it can work for you.
Some people in early recovery may go to a doctor; no problem as long as said doctor does not prescribe mind altering drugs, like tranquilizers (alcohol in pill form). The whole point of recovery is to become alcohol and drug free, not substitute one drug for another…duh! I am not talking about antidepressants, antibiotics, medications for other diseases… just don’t get sucked into believing that a doctor knows anything about your disease of alcoholism. He or she probably does not, and may sabotage your recovery unknowingly by giving you alcohol in pill form. (All the while, of course, trying to help.)

Others may go to religious counselors for additional help. Great! They may find that this help is very consistent with the 12 step programs. Church, Synagogue, and religious counseling can be a terrific adjunct to recovery. Most people find they need more than just religious people; they need others who have been where they have been; they need to be in groups of people with similar stories of drinking and drugging and recovery.
Whatever you choose, if you want to stop drinking and drugging, at least attend some 12 step meetings and listen. Pry your mind open for a few hours over a week or two, go to several meetings, and see what other recovering alcoholics and addicts have to say about their own discovery in recovery!

Steamboat Springs Newspaper

Alcohol Addiction Expert Banned.. For Drink Driving

A Leading expert on drugs and alcohol addiction has been banned from the road after he was caught drink driving twice.

University academic Rowdy Yates, 57, was found to be double the limit.

Only four months before, officers had breath-tested him at twice the limit at his house, minutes after being tipped off about his dodgy driving.

He claimed he got home sober but then swigged whisky in his garden shed.

But a sheriff refused to believe him afer hearing he would have had to down three large drams in minutes to give such a huge reading.

Sheriff Lindsay Foulis said: "It seems strange to be going out to your shed to have a glass of whisky. You would have had to drink a significant amount over a relatively short space of time."

Yates has kept his job as senior research fellow at Stirling University's Scottish Addiction Studies Group despite his conviction.

In the first incident, police went to his home near Auchterarder, Perthshire, after a taxi driver saw him driving erratically.

He told officers he had a drink in the pub then drove home and "topped up" in his shed because his wife had a "problem" with his drinking.

At the time he said he had only taken a swig from the bottle but a medical expert claimed it would take three very large whiskies to be double the limit.

The academic admitted driving while nearly twice the limit in the second incident, in December.

Police stopped him in his Vauxhall Frontera 4x4 close to his home because his registration plate was hidden by mud and smelled booze on his breath.

Sheriff Foulis found Yates guilty of the first charge and warned him he would be banned for several years as a result of being convicted twice. He was banned from driving while he awaits sentence at Perth Sheriff Court. Sentence was deferred for community service and social background reports.

Last night Yates refused to comment but a pal said: "Rowdy has had problems in the past and has admitted being a former drug addict.

"The university are aware of that so it's unlikely there will be any implication at work."

The university confirmed Yates was employed there but said: "We don't comment on individual staff members."

Last month Yates criticised the Government for failing to speak to him in a consultation of Scotland's experts on their new drugs policy.

He said: "I hesitate to say that I'm incredulous that I've not been consulted because that makes me sound arrogant but the simple facts remain that I'm on their doorstep.

"I'm vice-president of the European Federation of Therapeutic Communities, an ex-drug user who has provided a service for over 20 years and is regarded in other countries as an expert. Why haven't I been consulted?"

Yates has worked in the drugs field for more than 35 years.

In 2000 he sparked fury when he claimed the ecstasy death of Leah Betts only gained widespread media attention because she was middle class and photogenic.

Before his job at Stirling University, he was the director and co-founder of the Lifeline Project - one of the UK's longest established drug services.

His published work includes a book on drugs, music and popular culture since the 60s.

In 1994 he got the MBE for his work on the prevention of drug misuse.

Sunday Mail

Recovering alcoholic calls for programs

Freda doesn't know how long she's been sober. She won't count the days - it's too overwhelming. All that she knows is that she's feeling a sense of hope for the first time since she first started drinking at the age of 17.

That was 35 years, and several lifetimes ago.

On Thursday, she graduated from an addictions treatment program.

One of the keys to the program, she said, was telling her story. It's not a pretty story, nor one she is entirely comfortable telling.

"It's very, very hard on me. I get depressed, a lot of times through my journey," she says.

Denego grew up at Deschambault Lake, and moved to Prince Albert in 1982.

She never finished school.

And, she said, in the last 35 years, alcohol took back far more than it ever gave.

"I lost my husband, my kids and my home," she says. "I never went home. My husband was a mother to the kids - and the father. He's been sober 32 years, now."

Sadness creeps into her voice as she relates that her children are now, like her, facing problems with addictions. Her alcoholism, she admits openly, influenced their lives.

"They followed my footsteps."

Repeatedly, she dwells on the same perspective.

"I didn't see my kids growing up, because of the drinking.

"I'm fighting this addiction for (many) years. There are a few times ... where, I guess it's suicidal, And I get tired of living."

She has seen considerable violence in her life, and she equates alcohol with the violence she has witnessed.

Denego tells of how she recently witnessed a violent crime, but was unable to do anything to prevent it.

"When I see young people drunk, or they do something bad..." she falters, searching for the right words. "What I've seen ... a woman get raped in front of me. I couldn't do anything to help her."

At some point, the booze and its effects on her life became too much to tolerate.

"I got tired of being sick all the time. The doctor warned me about my health. I've got a heart problem, sometimes breathing problems. I was worried about that."

She heard about the merits of an addictions treatment program from other women.

Assistance from her pastor, combined with the addictions treatment program, has been the key to realizing she can craft a new life.

Now, she's asking for the powers-that-be to offer more services to deal with addictions and alcoholism, but specifically programs to aid young people.

"They should have more programs for young people, for addictions, to help themselves as much as they can."

She can't quite explain how she gained the courage to tell her story, other than to say that it seemed to her to be the best way to warn others - specifically youngsters - not to make the same mistakes.

"I don't know. I just wanted somebody to ... I feel bad for the people, feel sorry sometimes. I see a lot of people lost through my time. I see a lot of accidents."

Perhaps it's also a way of cementing her resolve.

"It's time that I do something about my addictions. I want to talk about them," she said.

Now, at the age of 52, she counters the darkness of her past by speaking optimistically of a future.

Simple goals. Achievable goals.

"It's time to change my life around. I want to go back to school, to get a job."

And sobriety?

She won't count the days. Her battle is ongoing. Indeed, as many recovering alcoholics discover, the battle never ends.

"I'm just taking it one day at a time. If I count the days, I'll start all over again."

Prince Albert Daily Herald

Alcopop tax rise to battle binge drinking

The Government will almost double the tax on pre-mixed alcoholic drinks as it blames John Howard for the youth binge-drinking scourge.

The tax will go up from $39 per litre of alcohol to $67 per litre from today – with pubs and clubs likely to significantly increase the cost of "alcopop" drinks to cover the rise.

A senior government source said the cost of RTDs (ready-to-drink products) was likely to increase by $1 a bottle. Queensland pubs and clubs charge, on average, about $8 per bottle, but they can range from $5 specials to $12.

The Government is expected to raise $2 billion from the tax hike, which will be put into a preventative health program.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd expressed concern recently at the spike in binge-drinking – particularly among young women – and promised a major initiative.

'Howard to blame'

Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon blamed the former Howard government for the rise in teenage binge drinking.

Ms Roxon said the decision to cut taxes on premixed alcoholic drinks eight years ago helped fuel the surge in excessive drinking by young people, particularly teenage girls.

The Rudd government overnight reversed the change, virtually doubling the excise on alcopops from midnight, pushing the cost of the drinks up by between 30 cents and $1.30 a bottle.

Ms Roxon said she did not know why the Howard government had cut the excise in the first place.

Survey demands action

The Government moved quickly after the release yesterday of the 2007 National Drug Strategy Household Survey, which highlighted a disturbing pattern of alcohol consumption by Australian teenage girls.

The survey found that:

• Girls aged between 12 and 15 years were three times as likely as teenage boys the same age to consume alcohol at least once a week.

• Almost twice as many girls aged 14-19 as boys were consuming alcohol at a level that had a high risk of long-term harm.

• Teenage girls were more likely than their male counterparts to have tried marijuana, amphetamines and cocaine.

Recent Australian Bureau of Statistics data shows RTD consumption continues to grow rapidly – more than 15 per cent in the past year compared with two per cent for overall alcohol consumption.

The data also shows that young people are more likely to drink RTDs, and teenage girls in particular are introduced to alcohol through RTDs.

Health groups welcome action

The Australian Drug Foundation described the move as a big step in the right direction.

"This tax fixes a problem that started with the introduction of the GST and shows that the government is serious about tackling alcohol problems in our community," foundation chief executive officer John Rogerson said.

Volumetric taxation was one of the most effective ways to reduce excessive consumption, he said.

The Public Health Association of Australia (PHA) said the price rise would have a major impact on drinking among young people, especially young women.

Alcopops were the first drink for as many as 60 per cent of girls, PHA president Mike Daube said.

"There is now dramatic evidence showing that young women are out-drinking their male counterparts - and unfortunately many of them drink to get drunk," Professor Daube said.

"This increase will make a real dent in one of our biggest current social problems."

Government 'shocked'

Health Minister Nicola Roxon was shocked by the survey statistics and said it was well-established that "alcopops" played a major role in hooking young girls into drinking.

"Something needs to be done to reduce the attractiveness of 'alcopops' to young girls and deliver a greater investment in preventative health," she said.

"Binge-drinking among young Australians is a real health risk that needs to be dealt with.

"And if we can tackle alcohol abuse at this formative age, then that will help us cut down alcohol abuse later in life as well."

The $27.31 per litre tax hike on the pre-mixed drinks would bring them into line with spirits and other alcohol and close a loophole from legislation introduced in 2000.

A senior government source said the revenue impact from the excise increase would be in excess of $2 billion.

Details of the Government's new preventative health measure and funding will be released when Treasurer Wayne Swan announces his first Budget on May 13.

The survey by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, last conducted in 2004, also found about 22 per cent of teens drank at least once a week.

Across all age groups, 82.9 per cent of Australians drank alcohol in the previous 12 months. In 1993, the rate was 77.9 per cent.

Sunday Mail

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Strategy to combat teen alcohol abuse

Health chiefs in Cumbria have vowed to crack down on alcohol abuse as almost a third of 14 to 17-year-olds admitted to buying booze in the last week.

Compared to the national average more Cumbrian underage teens are binge drinking and buying alcohol and more than twice the number of 14 and 15-year-old boys report drinking in pubs or bars.

Under 19s cause around a quarter of alcohol-related crime in Cumbria.

Now, more youngsters are admitted to hospital with drink-related problems and more parents are buying booze for their children than the UK average.

This week the county launched its first alcohol strategy – Time To Call Time.

Members of Cumbria Constabulary, the local health care trust, youth offending service, Connexions, probation service and the county council were at the North Lakes Hotel in Penrith to pledge to fight problem drinking.

Director of public health, Professor John Ashton, called the drinking culture in Cumbria a mess.and said that young people’s attitudes to alcohol were impacting on issues such as teen pregnancy rates.

He said allowing youngsters to drink responsibly from 16 would instil greater respect for alcohol.

“It would be better in a managed environment,” he said.

“Boarding schools have a tradition that kids can have a drink at the weekend and if it’s good enough for the wealthy, then it’s good enough for the masses.”He added that meditation should be taught in schools to help youngsters steer away from alcohol in future times of stress.

But he stressed teens should not become scapegoats for wider problems.

He said : “The north of England is the alcohol centre of the UK and Cumbria is right up there – we know we have an alcohol mess on our hands. We need to adjust cultural expectations.”Prof Ashton said supermarkets selling cheap alcohol should take responsibility along with licensed premises that serve to those under-age. He said all adults should be setting a good example by drinking within safe limits.

“We are not talking about being tee-total. The problem is the fish are the last to see the water and in this case the water is the alcohol.

“Alcohol is a subtle and vicious drug if not handled properly,” he added.

The study behind the strategy also revealed around 9,000 children in Cumbria have parents with drink problems, and more than a third of the most serious child cases dealt with by social workers include alcohol or drug misuse.

Kevin Jones, head of partnership and prevention for the council’s children’s services department, called the statistics “shocking”. He said: “Parents overindulge in alcohol and fail to recognise the effects that can have on their children.”

Details about of the strategy will are expected to be developed by August.

Times & Star

Friday, April 25, 2008

Alcohol campaign prompts calls for help

A new series of graphic advertisements about binge drinking have made an impact - prompting complaints but also calls for help, an alcohol helpline says.

The new campaign by the Alcohol Advisory Council of New Zealand (Alac) features three ads - a man ("Uncle Mark") slamming a child into furniture while whirling him around at a party, a young woman ("Lisa") becoming prey to a dangerous man in an alley and a father (`Danny") being found by his young daughter on the bathroom floor covered in blood and vomit after a violent night out at the pub.

Alcohol and Drug Association New Zealand chief executive Cate Kearney said the campaign, which began on April 6, may have upset a few people but was already working.

She said in its first couple of days the campaign prompted 15 complaints to the Broadcasting Standards Authority, but twice as many calls to the Drug Alcohol Helpline from people seeking help.

"In the first two days, calls to the helpline went up by 30 percent and within a week, they were up by 50 percent and have now dropped to 42 percent," she said.

"What's even more significant, is that over 80 percent of those that called due to the advertising had never called the Helpline before. That means the ads are hitting home with people who recognise the binge drinking pattern. It's given them the motivation to do something about it and seek help."

Ms Kearney said most of the calls related to the ads involving "Uncle Mark" and "Danny".

"One man said he realised Uncle Mark could easily have been him and he thought he'd better get help. And a lot of callers have identified with the guy in the pub."

Particularly disturbing were male callers who said they had seen the "Lisa" situation a lot and had never done anything to stop it, she said.

People who complained about the advertisements said they were too graphic, "shocking", and upset children.

"More compliments than complaints have been received at the Helpline with 90 percent of callers that comment on the campaign expressing appreciation."

Stuff NZ

Thursday, April 24, 2008

Voices of hope for alcoholics

When I attend meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous, I speak of my “experience, strength and hope.” As an alcoholic in recovery, I carry that message to others as part of the 12-step program I work in AA.

This week, I listened to other voices, both younger and older, carry the message, too, from as near as my community’s local high school in Iowa to as far as Woonsocket, R.I. Indeed, with the Internet, some of these voices go the distance.

In my local school district, I heard three young women, one still a student in the high school and one who graduated just a year ago, as they bravely spoke about their addictions, including alcoholism, facing an audience of people asking questions in a public environment that included a television camera.

Four days later I listened as an older gentleman, Normand, who had been homeless, living in the woods in Woonsocket, R.I., and actively drinking for many years, spoke to a different audience at a nearby movie theatre, after we all watched a documentary about his and a friend’s ongoing processes of recovery from alcoholism. We are never “recovered” from this disease, but “in recovery” if we aren’t actively drinking.

The young female panelists were speaking from personal experience about underage drinking and using drugs, as part of a town hall meeting to engage the public and help people better understand what the disease of addiction and the consequences of underage drinking entail. They spoke frankly, in the presence of school officials including the superintendent, about poorly chosen behaviors such as partying with all of the football team members, driving while drunk and getting high several times during the same school day.

One panelist, 24, is a single mother of three young children and answered an audience question about designated drivers at parties by saying she often served in that capacity simply because she had had relatively less to drink than her fellow partygoers. She added that she still shouldn’t have driven.

Another young woman on the panel, sporting tattoos and striking black facial make-up, spoke about her alcohol and drug use, noting she made sure she had enough packs of cigarettes to last for as long as needed when she knew she wouldn’t be able to purchase them for a period of time. I used to do that with alcohol, as do all alcoholics. We make sure we have our stashes, for long weekends, big parties, prior to inclement weather, store closures on weekends; any excuse will do, just so we won’t run out. She spoke also, she said for the first time, of going on a drunk that lasted for days. She said that one drug led to her use of others.

Normand Cartier, the 49-year-old man who is one subject of the documentary I saw titled “Lost in Woonsocket,” was the man I met, who talked to audience members about being a “maintenance” drinker. He said he literally could not see, nor could he take a step, until he first took a drink upon waking every morning. He drank to maintain his ability to function daily.

The film in which Normand appears was produced for an Arts and Entertainment program called “Random 1” (www.lostinwoonsocket.com), and is now being shown around the country to raise funds for homeless shelters and addiction-recovery programs. Normand was filmed on location in the woods where he slept in a tent with a friend, Mark, a fellow homeless alcoholic whose family wanted nothing more to do with him.

The filmmakers take these men from the woods one at a time and they are filmed in real time as they get a new start on life, with fresh haircuts done by Joe, an alcoholic with 27 years of sobriety, who also carries a message of experience, strength and hope. They each go through a seven-day detox, to begin to rid their bodies of the toxins created by alcohol abuse, and then through lengthy periods in residential rehab.

Normand has stayed sober for well over two years, and continues to carry the message by accompanying the film and speaking at fundraisers, and lobbying for changes in laws in the Rhode Island statehouse. His friend, following the same path as the majority of alcoholics, does not work a 12-step program and, Normand said, cannot stay sober for long. Maybe someday Mark will be able to do so. Normand said his friend has excuses for his drinking, and in the film Mark says the fame of making the movie, becoming a local celebrity and called “Mr. Hollywood” on the street, was too much, so he relapsed.

Normand said simply, “I don’t use excuses or the word ‘but;’ I use the word ‘because.’” He said the point where he surrendered to his powerlessness over alcohol, the first of the 12-steps, and he decided to stop drinking was when he was reunited with his children and grandchildren he didn’t know he had. His grown-up sons and daughters had contacted the filmmakers when they saw their dad on the television. He had not seen his family in more than 12 years.

The high school panelist who talked about getting high five to seven times in a single day also said she had entered and completed a three-month residential treatment program, after deciding she needed help.

Those of us in recovery circles talk a lot about “hitting bottom,” the point at which we have had enough of drug and/or alcohol usage, like Normand. This young woman on the panel said, “you reach bottom when you stop digging.”

All of these speakers had stopped digging, as I did when my family sent me to 28-day residential treatment for alcoholism, in Minnesota at Hazelden, almost 3 1/2 years ago.

Instead of despair, we now extend messsages of optimism for our futures, and the hope that other alcoholics and addicts can learn from us.

The young lady who stayed drunk for days is now attending a nearby community college and making better, more informed choices, planning to move away from an environment that she said was dangerous for her. Her family instituted some tough love to help her, and she was grateful, she said.

The 24-year-old mom is working with at-risk students at a nearby high school, is also employed at a restaurant, and she volunteers with a group of young parents needing guidance. Normand travels around the country and speaks of his work lobbying in the Rhode Island legislature, restoring funding for programs that can help addicts and alcoholics. He said he now has two more grandchildren and his family is a big reason for his continuous sobriety. And the high school student completed her treatment and is now armed with a body of knowledge about her disease that will help her in the future.

I write columns about my experience, strength and hope, echoing the message that Normand, a roughly hewn, former welder in the shipyards of the northeast coast left with the group who attended the film featuring him, which is that alcoholism does not discriminate but can be overcome, one day at a time.

Star football players, doctors, lawyers, journalists, welders, high school students, older folks and younger ones, college graduates like me or high school dropouts – we all may suffer from the same disease, but we can talk about it, informing, teaching others, and we can choose to travel a path toward recovery. To keep our sobriety, we must give it away.

Normand was given a “blessing ring” by Joe, the barber, after his first haircut and before he entered detox. He proudly displayed the small, round, silver charm to us at the theater. He keeps it on a keyring now that he owns one because he is no longer homeless, and I thought as I looked at the light in his eyes that we are all of us blessed, lucky enough to be on the road to continued sobriety and a better life.

Libson Sun

Fayette County panel discusses underage drinking

In an effort to increase understanding and awareness of underage drinking in Fayette County, the Fayette County Drug and Alcohol Commission Inc. played host to a town hall meeting recently.

"We're doing prevention in the schools, starting at the first grade," said Charlotte Korba of the FCDAC, just one of the speakers on a panel of experts to testify how underage drinking has crossed their paths.

"You may think that's too early to start (prevention education); it's never too early to start."

Pat Mohan, a representative of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, said young drivers are at risk any time they are on the roads. Add alcohol to the mix and risk factors increase.

"Drunk driving is a crime that is 100 percent preventable," Mohan said.

She said in her eight years with MADD, she's heard enough horror stories. And she knows you don't have to be in the vehicle to be a victim of drunk driving.

"We have to teach everyone who's involved to make the roadways safer for all of us," she said.

Police also have to deal with underage drinking.

"In the last two years, we issued 50 citations for underage drinking," said Uniontown City Police Chief Jason Cox.

Police normally get involved after someone underage drinks, has his decision-making affected and does something illegal, he said.

Mark King of the Fayette County Juvenile Probation Office said parental cooperation is always a big plus when it comes to addressing underage drinking.

District Judge Ronald Haggerty deals with young drinkers after they have been approached by the police. He said the biggest problem is the attitudes held by both the children and their parents.

Haggerty's advice for arresting officers of underage drinkers is to take them to their parents while the minor is still intoxicated, to let the parents see and smell the alcohol on them. That way parents won't convince themselves that police are charging their child falsely.

Haggerty reminded parents that it's against the law to furnish alcohol to minors. It's something parents sometimes forget -- especially with upcoming graduation parties.

"It will happen this graduation year," Haggerty said. "It happens every year."

Phillip Rishel of the Herod Funeral Home in Point Marion has dealt with the end result of underage drinking.

"Seventy-five percent of younger deaths are from drinking," he said.

When the friends of a victim walk away from the casket, many have blank looks on their faces. But Rishel sid he has never heard one say he would change his attitude toward drinking.

Daily Courier

Alcohol sales in shops and garages to be restricted

The Government is today expected to announce plans to restrict the sale of alcohol in supermarkets and garage forecourts.

It follows increasing concern about the level of alcohol abuse — highlighted again this week by a report showing the damage the drug is causing Irish society as alcohol is a factor in half of all murders and more than 25% of admissions to A&E.

Justice Minister Brian Lenihan will publish a report from a government-appointed expert group and, more significantly, the proposed legislation to implement its key recommendations. Restricting the sale of alcohol in supermarkets and garage forecourts is expected to be a key finding.

Taoiseach Bertie Ahern gave a firm signal on this issue last month when saying: “What is clear is that what’s happening in the garage forecourts, what’s happening in the supermarket, what’s happening in the off-licence generally is leading to an excessive amount of alcohol being available.”

Mr Lenihan established the Alcohol Advisory Group in January to urgently examine key aspects of the law governing the sale and consumption of drink.

In particular, it was asked to examine:

* the increase in the number of supermarkets, convenience stores and petrol stations with off-licences and the way alcohol was sold in such outlets.

* the increasing number of special exemption orders obtained by licensed premises that permitted longer opening hours.

* the use, adequacy and effectiveness of existing sanctions, particularly those directed towards combating excessive and underage alcohol consumption.

When announcing the advisory group, Mr Lenihan made clear his intention to change the law before the summer. In tandem with the group’s report today, he will publish the heads, or main points, of the Intoxicating Liquor/Public Order Bill 2008.

This bill will then go before the Dáil for consideration. Mr Lenihan has already expressed his hope of getting cross-party support for the measures involved.

Irish Examiner

Booze-fuelled violence doubles in decade

NSW authorities have defended their efforts to tackle drunken crime after a report showed the number of booze-fuelled attacks had doubled in under a decade.

The NSW auditor-general's report found there were 20,475 alcohol-related assaults (ARAs) statewide in the 2006-07 financial year.

The figure has risen steadily through the early 2000s from the 10,305 ARAs recorded in 1997-98, according to the report released.

The report also found almost a third of these violent incidents occurred at licensed premises where laws surrounding the irresponsible serving of alcohol applied.

NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione said more could be done to wind down the assault rate, and about 15 per cent of the state's licensed outlets were "problem hotels".

"Everything is not fine," the commissioner told reporters in Sydney.

"Since 1999, there has been a 400 per cent increase in the number of matters we've brought before the court ... we haven't taken our eye off the ball," he said.

Mr Scipione denied there was a shortage of police to oversee the hotels, but said a dedicated 30-person "alcohol law enforcement command" was being established.

NSW Auditor-General Peter Achterstraat said it was the inconsistent approach by NSW police and the regulator, Office of Liquor, Gaming and Racing (OLGR), that was partially responsible for the rise in assaults.

In some cases, licensees would receive a verbal warning for serving intoxicated people when, for a similar incident, another would be fined, the auditor said.

NSW had more than 14,200 licensed outlets, the report stated, with police referring 136 alleged licensing breaches to prosecutors last year.

The OLGR referred just six cases in the same period.

"The increase in alcohol-related crime is disturbing," Mr Achterstraat said.

"A lot more needs to be done to enforce and promote the responsible service of alcohol.

"We need to make sure that police are trained better, and the public is better educated and there is a consistency in the application of the laws across the state."

The report, entitled Working with Hotels and Clubs to Reduce Alcohol-Related Crime, found 30 per cent of ARAs occurred on licensed premises in 2006-07, another 35 per cent occurred outdoors, while 24 per cent were in residential homes.

The NSW opposition said the 30 extra police would only scratch the surface of a problem that reached deep into suburban Sydney and rural centres statewide.

"Alcohol-related violence and other offences have reached epidemic proportions in NSW and the community is sick and tired of baring the cost," Acting Opposition Leader Andrew Stoner said.

The Australian Hotels Association (AHA) said the report highlighted a lack of action by police on patrol.

"General duties police are the first to respond when hotels call for assistance," AHA director of policing and regulatory relations John Green said.

"They should have better knowledge of the laws and how to administer them."

Comment was being sought from the NSW government.

Sydney Morning Heral

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Interview with a Recovering Alcoholic

Andrew used to be an alcoholic. He's come a long way in his life. He's the one person in my life who I can truly say lost it all, and has overcome. Andrew's tale is both heart breaking and heart warming and I had to share it with all of you.

Andrew, at what age did you start drinking?

Drinking has always been permitted in our household; I can honestly remember my parents telling stories about the fact as a baby I would dive across the room for a Manhattan. My mother and father both drank and entertained a lot, later even after their divorce my mother owned a bar and my father practically lived in bars.

Why do you think you starting drinking at that point? Did something happen?

The easy access and permissiveness made it easy to obtain, early growth of facial hair contributed the ease of buying beer at carryout stores. Drinking was not looked down upon back then, like smoking it was the cool and manly thing to do.

I would say that it was after my wife left me that the drinking took a turn for the worse. We had been having trouble and she had threatened to kill herself during a fight we had, my son (3 years old at the time) was under us as I took the knife away from his mother. I sent him to live with his grandmother until his mom and I could resolve the issues we had in our lives. At the suggestion of my wife and a neighbor we joined a local church and sought marriage counseling with the pastor there. After several weeks of hearing I should bring my son home and a mother should be with her son, and wanting to believe God was in charge and would restore my family, I brought my son home. A week later my wife run off with my son while I was at work. I was very angry with those people, the church and God. After accepting that my wife and son were not going to return, I started instead of heading to an empty home I headed to the bars, just like on the show "Cheers" soon everyone knows your name and no one is a stranger to misery. I believe it was at that point started to follow in my father's footsteps of living in the bars more than I frequented my home.

It wasn't long that I had my favorite hangouts, I would find bars that I could kill time at. Over time and several bars and friends, I eventually lost my license due to drinking and driving. That didn't stop me. I moved to the inner city so I could travel by bus, I use to plan my bus routes so I could get off near a bar and kill time between busses. Although I gained a wealth of useless trivia and honed many skills like billiards, poker, and miniature bowling over time mathematics and science took over and my life became unmanageable, it was after my father passed away that the drinking became a need and no longer a passing of time. I remember waking up in the middle of the night shaking so hard from withdrawal that I kept a quart of beer on my nightstand so I could stop the shakes and go back to sleep.

How did you stop drinking?

Actually I didn't stop drinking, it was Feb. 96 and it was getting cold, my drinking had lost me everything and I found myself on the street with the homeless. I wanted to go stay out at my mothers until weather broke. She didn't want me out there unless I promised to seek help for my drinking and check myself into a hospital. Of course I would do what she wanted play the game till weather broke. So I called a toll free number she gave me, it didn't matter it was cold on the riverbank and the place I was sleeping was anything but warm.

Instead of a hospital I actually ended up at a Ministry that dealt with alcoholics and addicts. It was call Storehouse Ministry. After interviewing with one of their staff and expressing a desire to stop drinking I was accepted into their program of rehabilitation.

The program involved community service, bible study, rigorous meetings and counseling sessions. I remember thinking to my self that I couldn't believe I was entering into a Christian program run by the similar bible thumping people as the ones I blamed for losing my son and wife. I told them in the beginning that it wasn't that I didn't believe in God, or Jesus, I just didn't know were they lived and was sure I wanted to know. My lack of knowledge of the Lord and the bible was literally composed of Charleston Heston as Moses and any other biblical movie they showed at Easter back then.

The second day of not drinking started to take affect; the withdrawal and shakes had started. It was my first bible study class; there was a teacher that day he called me up to the podium after our bible class. After asking me a few questions and looking into my eyes he laid his hands upon me and started to pray, I really didn't fight it as I really didn't feel well enough to protest. He prayed then started to chant, which later I learned was praying in tongues, and I felt a warm and calmness wash over me. I felt so much better when he finished all I could do was say thank you. He said don't thank me it was the Lord that healed me; he was just the instrument of His mercy. There were several guys in the program and I saw a lot of them come and go. It wasn't until Apr 12th 1996 at a prayer meeting that I went to that I found God and accepted him into my life. The minister that was visiting that Sunday had written a book "God don't make Junk". I had just read that book a week before his visit and felt it was God trying to convince me to come into the fold. It was on that day I accepted Jesus as my Lord and Savor.

In July of 1996 I learned that my mother was dieing from cancer. She had asked that I come live with her and her husband and help him take care of her until she passed away. She has chosen not to treat the cancer and accept it, she wanted to die at home not in a hospital. I agreed and with permission from the ministry left to live with them until she passed away. I believe that her passing only reinforced my reliance on God's will and His part in my life.

Do you worry you might start drinking again?

Recovering Alcoholics who take their recover seriously always worry about that day, most of us cling to God for strength, other hold their higher powers. We try to avoid triggers and our recovery is not only that we stopped drinking but also took serious steps on learning and improving our selves in the process. No I do not worry about starting again I have a close grip on God and my sobriety, but I do not dismiss the fact that starting again would lead to my death and I don't want to die as a drunk.

Do you avoid social events due to the pressure of drinking?

Although I there are some in recovery that would avoid such event, I do not avoid social events or meeting people in bars, however, I do not temp fate but hanging out in bars or with others that drink on a daily basis. Shortly into my sobriety those who were my drinking friends had to be let go. I had to move on with out them as they would have dragged me back to the barstool beside them, after all we know that misery loves company and its hard to be miserable when your sober and have the light of the Lord fueling your soul.

Were your parents alcoholics?

With all I know about alcoholism, I cannot and will not answer that question, I loved my parents and they did the best they could with what they knew. Looking back could things have been done differently? Of course it could hind site is always 20/20 however I cant say they were or were not, was it something they had to do or wanted to do? I don't know. In the end drinking was something I had to do, my body would cause me pain if I didn't drink. That is a fact, I know the truth about me, not about my parents and may never know as they have both passed on to a better place.

Do you believe alcoholism is hereditary?

Do not believe alcoholism is hereditary in the sense it in the genes, but I do believe in generational curses passed down from one generation to the next. I believe we make choices based on what we learn and yearn from life and that it sometimes leads us to some very dark and dreary places.

I have read books that wish to link alcoholism to genes or environmental factors. I prefer to think of it as a curse of overindulgence, that without guidance we all have the potential to get lost. Whether its booze, drugs, food, depression or violence, when it becomes a controlling factor in our lives, then it becomes a problem for everyone.

Have you ever been tempted to just have one drink?

Everyday, temptation is out there all the time, I have some great memories from my drinking days, and they were not all bad. Temptation is just that an appealing view of a choice we can make. Since I do attend social event, I have kissed woman with the taste of alcohol on their lips, tempted I have been but I believe God has a greater purpose for me than lying in a ditch drunk and passed out. When tempted to the point that I might give in I just remember to pray, turn it over to God and let him deal with it.

Have you shared your testimony of how you have overcome with others?

I share the testimony ever chance I get, although there are different crowds to appeal to and variations of the testimony to fit the circumstances that brought my confession to light, they all share the fact that without God all that I have achieved would not have been possible, and that Jesus as my savior gives me the strength to make it one day at a time.

Do you feel your purpose is to help other alcoholics stop drinking?

It is my place to shine bright and be a beacon, and although I spent two year with Barnabus Ministry working with recovering alcoholics and addicts I don't believe I can help anyone stop drinking, that is something they need to find within themselves. I can only allow God's light to shine through me and hope that it is seen and accepted.

Although I no longer work for the ministry as they have moved to a bigger location farther away from my current quarters, I still minister on a smaller scale at local Alcoholics Anonymous meetings.

Informative Post

Kids drinking into oblivion

I don't know why we think we are any different than any other part of the world: gambling, drinking, violence, traffic congestion ... the list could go on and on.

Recently I was in the UK where people were talking about the same things.

For instance, binge drinking is high on their list of concerns and the articles out of the newspapers could be mistaken as being the same ones written here.

The problems seem to be identical.

I guess the only difference is that MPs in the UK want to put the price up on alcohol but most sensible people realise that, if they do, the drug trade will probably just grow bigger.

It seems to me that getting drunk is something that seems to be universal. Whether it be alcohol, drugs or chewing some type of nut, people have being doing it for centuries.

I am not saying it is right but it has been going on for a while.

Now, before I go any further into this, I should declare to those who do not know me that, as a hotel manager many years ago, I probably did most of the things that I am now saying not to do.

But I agree with most people that the problem is getting bigger and something needs to be done.

I agree with state politicians having a look at late-night hours and bringing them back into line.

Nothing good happens after 1am.

But the problem with doing that is ever since Expo 88 our culture is to go out late and stay out well into the early hours of the next day.

Changing that is going to be difficult but it is worth a go.

The downside is if they start charging big fees for late-night permits, the multinational operators will get bigger while a lot of ma and pa businesses will fall to the wayside, which could mean a whole lot of kids in parks late at night in regional areas unsupervised.

Of course, they need to fix the public transport problem before they start shutting venues at midnight or 1am or there will be more carnage than there is now.

But I see a couple of other things as major contributing factors: ready-to-drink alcohol, which is lethal to young people, and shots of spirits or liqueurs.
These are just two examples.

Now, venues can talk about accords and how they are going to manage their businesses but, fair dinkum, anyone that sells Jaeger bombs is not serious about trying to fix the problem.

Granted, some responsible folk might have one as a nightcap and stumble off to bed. But most are drinking them for one reason.

The fun police should stop venues from selling straight-up shots of anything because it appears a fair percentage of people can’t handle it.

So, think earlier hours, no shots, more buses and taxis and no 7% ready-to-drink beverages and maybe the problem starts to turn around.

Sunshine Coast Daily

Alcohol plays major role in spiral of killing

Alcohol abuse is severely damaging our health, but the Government has no action plan to combat the spiralling problem.

A damning new survey published by health authorities yesterday paints a bleak picture of the violence, injury and death fuelled by increasing abuse of alcohol.

The report, the largest of its kind ever produced here, found that consumption rose by almost 3pc last year.

And it highlighted serious shortcomings in the Government's response to the problem.

Unlike the war against drugs or tobacco, there is no national plan in place to tackle the growing problem.

In a damning indictment of the Government's failure to tackle the problem, the 'Alcohol Related Harm in Ireland' report demands:

* Effective plans to cut alcohol abuse.

* A national watchdog to ensure the policies work.

* A system to monitor alcohol-related harm.

The report said: "The dramatic increase in alcohol related harm does not bode well for the future health and wellbeing of the population in Ireland."

Spelling out the frightening toll of alcohol abuse on the streets, in homes and hospitals the report revealed:

* Over 25 years homicide mortality rates increased, peaking in 1998. But after a fall for for three years there was a steep rise in 2006.

* Between 1996-2002 public order adult offences rose by a massive 247pc -- after falling they increased again.

* Between 1990 and 2006, 2462 people were killed on the roads between 4am and 9pm -- the time most associated with drink driving.

* A survey found 44pc of all people said they suffered harm as a result of their own or someone else's alcohol use.

* Almost half of men and over a quarter of women believed drinking alcohol had contributed to them having sex without contraception. Reported sexually transmitted diseases went up by 217pc between 1995 and 2004;

The report goes on to say that the risk of harm to babies because their mothers are drinking while pregnant is rising.

Alcohol related cancers will more than double between 2005 and 2020 -- this is worrying because much of the rise will come from young and middle aged drinkers.

A detailed examination of crime files show almost half (46pc) of all killers were intoxicated, while alcohol is a contributory factor in 36.5pc of all fatal road crashes.

The report points out the recommendations of the Government's Strategic Task Force on Alcohol (STFA) have been endorsed by the HSE.

However, there is no national structure with specific targets or timelines in place to implement them.

"Alcohol related harm will not be reduced unless action is taken. Delaying the necessary action increases the growing burden of harm for everyone in society," the report added.

Independent ie

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Teen drinking can affect the brain

About 40 people turned out Wednesday night to discuss teen drinking, the long-term damage it causes to the brain, and what parents can do to help prevent it.

The meeting was the second such forum sponsored by the Black River Area Community Coalition, which formed in 2004 in response to concerns that teen drinking in the area was on the rise.

Guest speaker Robert Edwards, chief of police for Dover, has spent the last 10 years giving lectures on teen drinking, including speeches to the FBI National Academy and Pride Youth Programs, which encourage teens to be drug- and alcohol-free.

"This is about getting adults interested in this problem before it's too late," Edwards said. "The problem begins with parents but law enforcement has been given the problem."

Edwards made the argument that use of alcohol as a teen will make the user more prone to become an addict later in life.

Edwards said that in an individual's brain, the amygdala, which prompts pleasure-seeking behavior, forms early in life.

In contrast, Edwards said, the prefrontal cortex, the decision-making part of the brain that regulates impulse control, does not fully develop until a person is about 25 years old.

"This is a very important time and that's why you shouldn't put anything in your brain to impair it," Edwards said.

Edwards said alcohol use during the time the prefrontal cortex is still developing can permanently retard development, in essence halting a person's cognitive development.

Edwards said that as a police officer, he estimated between 80 and 85 percent of his calls are in some way substance-abuse-related.

"The older adults that we deal with do not have these skills," Edwards said. "We don't encounter people with substance abuse problems who say they started drinking at 21."

Edwards said that a person with an impaired prefrontal cortex is more likely to be impulsive, to lack coping and problem-solving skills, and will often not take responsibility for his actions.

Edwards's advice to parents, while not groundbreaking, was perhaps a good reminder. Set a curfew, be up when your kids come home, know who your kids are with and set reasonable consequences and enforce them.

Black River High School students appear to drink more frequently than most teens in the state, according to the Vermont Youth Risk Survey.

The survey — conducted in high schools statewide as a partnership between the Department of Health and the Department of Education — found that in 2005, 40 percent of Ludlow teens reported consuming at least one alcoholic beverage in the last 30 days.

This figure was just slightly higher than the statewide average of 37 percent.

In 2007, however, the percentage jumped to 49 percent, while the statewide average increased slightly to 39 percent, making Ludlow's teens 10 percent more likely to have consumed alcohol than their peers across the state.

While Ludlow teens are more likely to drink, they are not more likely to binge drink, according to the survey.

The survey found that 23 percent of Ludlow teens had binged on alcohol within the last 30 days in 2007, which is identical to the figure gathered statewide.

Binge drinking is defined by the survey as having consumed five or more drinks within a couple of hours.

Binge drinking is on the rise, both among Ludlow teens and across the state. Between 2005 and 2007, the percentage of binge-drinking Ludlow teens rose from 20 to 23 percent. During the same time, the statewide average rose from 21 to 23 percent.

In addition to discussing teen alcohol abuse, BRACC program coordinator Paul Faenza also had a display of energy drinks — both with alcohol and without — that he had found for sale between Ludlow and Rutland.

"We thought we should do this because I go into the schools and I see kids drinking these drinks and the parents don't know how much caffeine is in them," Faenza said.

Faenza found 45 different energy drinks by Red Bull, Amp and Monster and others, and labeled the caffeine content on the bottom of each can. Most cans had between 240 and 300 milligrams of caffeine. Vermont Poison Control states that a person can overdose on 1,000 milligrams of caffeine.

In addition, Faenza found energy drinks with both caffeine and alcohol, in some cases with alcohol contents of 8 percent. Faenza noted the cans with alcohol and without are nearly identical.

"I brought these cans up to the clerk at the store and she wasn't sure if they had alcohol or not," Faenza said.

Edwards said the long-term effects of caffeine abuse for teens is still being studied, but preliminary results have found the energy drinks can disturb their sleep cycles.

BRACC will hold its next meeting at 5:30 p.m. on May 13 at the Fletcher Memorial Library in Ludlow.

Rutland Herald

Boozy Betty: a warning of the effects of alcohol

A Prevailing image of students has tended to be that of the hard-drinking kind. Boozy Betty is no different. She's out drinking with friends into the wee hours, she can't remember how she got home and her grades are beginning to suffer as a result.

Boozy Betty is a poster girl to remind Heriot-Watt students in Edinburgh of the dangers of drinking too much. The campaign has been so successful the National Union of Students in Scotland has formally endorsed it to be promoted throughout the country.

The campaign was launched by Action on Alcohol and Drugs in Edinburgh in November, who distributed posters and cards, as well as training student wardens and welfare staff on alcohol issues. A regular on campus advice service point was also set up for students.

Female students were asked how they felt about the campaign, which lists a typical week for Boozy Betty, including, "missed lectures, having her bank card refused, going into town for some serious partying, developing a muffin top and looking rough".

Christine Johnstone, director of student welfare at the university, said it wanted to be proactive and was not reacting to a particular problem on campus. However, researchers found 36% of female students drank eight to 16 units on both Friday and Saturday nights - four to five times the recommended amount.

The majority of students surveyed said the campaign had made them reflect on their drinking habits and more than a third said they had felt embarrassed about their drinking. The evaluation report also found 10% said the resources would prompt them to reduce their alcohol use, mainly because of the impact on their studies and falling behind.

Almost all respondents said they had missed lectures after a night out, but just 7% said they had changed their behaviour, citing peer pressure and lack of confidence as the main reason for why changing was too difficult.

First year student Gillian Stewart, 19, said the campaign had made her think about how much she was drinking and admitted she was surprised by how many calories were in alcohol.

"The whole campaign came from a different angle than most others because it focused on what would happen to us now, like missing deadlines and getting muffin tops, (spare tyres) rather than what will happen years down the line. It's made me more conscious of what I'm drinking and in my circle of friends, we're more careful of what we're doing."

Liam Burns, depute president (elect) of NUS Scotland, and president of  Heriot-Watt University Students' Association said: "NUS Scotland voted last month to formally endorse the promotion of Boozy Betty and promote the campaign in colleges and universities across Scotland in recognition of its success. It has also had considerable interest from across the UK, with similar mandates being passed during NUS UK annual conference."

Tom Wood, chairman of Action on Alcohol and Drugs in Edinburgh said: "There's a tendency for people to dismiss excessive student drinking as simply a phase and something that students do'. However, the evidence clearly shows that alcohol-related illnesses and deaths among young women are growing, and we are seeing a growing trend of problematic drinking among this group.

" The evaluation clearly shows Boozy Betty has made many of the women start to question their drinking and in some cases even prompt a reduction in their drinking - this is immensely encouraging."

Heriot-Watt University plans to continue the Boozy Betty campaign and will launch a similar project targeting male students in the next academic year.

Sunday Herald

Drink-drive limit should be under a pint, says study

The drink-driving limit should be lowered to less than a pint of beer and brought into line with the rest of Europe, according to a motorists' poll.

The findings in a survey of Automobile Association (AA) members increase the pressure on the government to reduce the limit from 80mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood to 50mg.

The Department for Transport is expected to publish a consultation paper on a drink-driving crackdown, including whether random breath tests should be introduced later this year.

According to the poll of 17,500 drivers, two-thirds were in favour of lowering the limit, with more women than men choosing this option, while nearly a third of all respondents called for a zero limit.

Edmund King, the AA president, warned that lowering the limit was unlikely to have a significant effect on drink-drive-related deaths, which totalled 540 in 2006.

"It's not the entire answer to the problem of drink-driving. Many people are way over the limit and if we just lowered it, it would be no help at all in preventing those who are so far over," said Mr King.

"There is probably a hardcore who have a drink problem rather than a drive problem."

Drink-drive deaths have fallen in recent years, after an upward trend in 2003 and 2004, when the number of fatalities reached 580 each year. However, the total remains higher than nearly 10 years ago, when there were 460 drink-drive deaths in 1999.

According to a study by University College London, a 50mg limit would prevent 65 deaths annually and 230 injuries. Ministers have argued that there is no point in reducing the limit until the 80mg level is properly enforced, otherwise drivers will ignore the new law.

King said one way of introducing a lower limit could include offering a nine-month amnesty to drivers when the 80mg limit - equivalent to one and a half pints of beer - is reduced. He added that a rule change would also provide an opportunity for a renewed publicity campaign against drink-driving.

"If limits change, there would be a lot of publicity and it would send out a very strong anti-drink-drive message," he said.

Robert Gifford, head of the parliamentary advisory council for transport safety, said the findings would increase the pressure on the government to bring drink-drive guidelines in line with major European countries, whose limits are between 20mg and 50mg.

"This is yet another indication that the public mood is ahead of the government, and it is another reason why the government should lower the drink-drive limit."

The UK is among the harshest penalisers of drink-driving in Europe, with a 12-month ban being the minimum punishment. Ministers have said they will retain the year-long ban if the limit is lowered.

However, enforcement of drink-driving regulations has been criticised in recent years. The number of breath tests in Britain fell from 765,000 in 1999 to 578,000 in 2004, a slump that the government hopes to address by introducing random breathalyser tests. The Home Office is also working on a "drugalyser" project to catch out drivers who get behind the wheel while under the influence of drugs.

A spokesperson for the DfT said: "We are currently considering a range of options to further cut the toll of deaths on the roads, including looking at drink-driving. A consultation is planned for later this year."

Guardian

Grog abuse starts in the home

The war against binge drinking has begun, and not before time.

Thousands of young people are turning up at hospitals all around Australia every night of the week needing treatment for alcohol abuse.

This is a national scandal and demands forthright action.

In Queensland, the Bligh Government fired a salvo at binge drinking by announcing a crackdown on alcohol consumption and a review of opening times for clubs and other liquor outlets.

The Government also wants to double the fines for adults - including parents - who supply alcohol to minors.

The government isn't the only organisation worried about alcohol abuse, especially among young people.

The Gold Coast chapter of the Queensland Hotels Association says pub owners want limits imposed on the alcohol content of pre-mixed cans and bottles.

In some cases, a standard 375ml pre-mixed drink can contain the equivalent of nearly three standard drinks.

It is no wonder teenagers, drawn by the attractive packaging and the sweet taste of 'alcopops', become very drunk, very quickly.

But pre-mixed drinks are just one element of a problem which has many causes.

What Gold Coasters see on the streets of Surfers Paradise and at teenage parties in the suburbs, happens most weekends all around the nation. Binge drinking has become an epidemic for Australia.

Thirty per cent of children aged between 14 and 17 drink alcohol every week and 70 per cent get it from friends or relatives. In other words, the likely source of alcohol abuse among young people is the poor example set by the people who supposedly love them most -- their parents and friends.

The custom in Australia used to be that parents did not give alcohol to children under the legal drinking age. Now that custom, based on the wisdom of what alcohol can do to a developing brain, appears to be rarely applied.

If binge drinking is to be beaten or at least minimised, parents have to start caring about the attitudes of their children towards alcohol.

Expecting governments to fix society's hangover is little more than a cop-out.

Good Thinking

The hard work really begins now for the ideas coming out of Summit 2020.

In his initial report, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd made the point that the momentum had to come not just from governments.

"The ideas presented indicate that many Australians expect business and not-for-profit organisations to play more prominent roles in Australia," he said.

"There is a sense of government needing to see its role as creating opportunities through fair and consistent policies delivered with a light hand - government as enabling rather than controlling, as encouraging rather than prescribing," he said.

It is a position endorsed by this newspaper.

The greatest achievements in Australian history have come largely through the private sector.

A more open and subservient government creating opportunities for entrepreneurs and innovators is a vision worth working towards.

Gold Coast

Monday, April 21, 2008

Buy the booze, pay the fine, parents told

Parents who send their children to schoolies week and parties with cartons of alcohol will face $6000 fines under tough new Queensland Government laws.

The penalty is double that flagged