Friday, June 30, 2006

Drunken pupils drive teacher out of town

A Teacher has revealed she has moved towns to avoid meeting drunk pupils on the streets near her home at night.

The teacher, who works at a Burnley secondary school and has moved to Accrington, also said children as young as 11 were regularly turning up to lessons hung over.

Her comments come after an exclusive Evening Telegraph investigation revealed that in the last three years more than 350 East Lancashire children 100 of them under 11 had been rushed to hospital emergency departments suffering the effects of drinking.

A teaching union chief said while he was not aware of children turning up to class hung over, the statistics released under the Freedom of Information Act were "scary".
continued...

The experienced teacher, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of further trouble, has two teenage children of her own.

She said: "We have got a lot of children at school who regularly drink and that is during the week as well as weekends.

"They even tell us that their parents buy them the alcohol. They all drink alcopops and you can't teach them some days."

She said the state of some of her pupils was "terrible" and added: "It all comes from the parents. Some are alcoholics and drug addicts and they are not showing their children any kind of example.

"Underage drinking is a massive problem and it is teachers like me who have to deal with it. You get some as young as 11 who are hung over in class.

"In the end I had to move out of Burnley with my husband because there were kids who found out where I lived and they would go rampaging down the street."

She said that she thought part of the problem was the different drinking culture in England now.

She added: "When I was young pubs were places where only older people went but now that is different. Pubs are always full with young people and it is seen as acceptable and a part of growing up to get very drunk."

Les Turner, Lancashire secretary of the National Association of Headteachers which represents more than 700 heads, deputies and assistant heads said: "I can put my hand on my heart say not one of our members has ever contacted the union complaining or asking for advice as one of their children has come into class suffering from the effects of alcohol abuse.

"But those A&E figures are scary. "In schools, as part of the governments Every Child Matters initiative, children look at how to be responsible and keep safe, including the issue of drug abuse and nicotine and alcohol the most abused drug in society. It is now considered socially unacceptable to smoke in public places and it would be nice if when people are smashed out of their heads people take the same view.

"But at all levels of society we drink too much."

This Is Lancashire

Thursday, June 29, 2006

Price of a round

Drinking problems are costing billions in lost hours and wrecking careers, writes Peter BartramFDs could be picking up their share of a £6.4bn tab for drink problems in the workplace.

According to recent figures from insurance company UnumProvident, up to 17 million working days are lost each year from alcohol-related illnesses. The equivalent of a further 20 million working days disappear as the result of lower productivity and mistakes made by workers.

“There has been little debate about what role employers should play when the negative effects of alcoholism become apparent in the workplace,” says Dr Michael O’Donnell, chief medical officer at UnumProvident.

The problem of drink-fuelled under-performance has been spotlighted by the high-profile departure of Liberal Democrat party leader Charles Kennedy.

And with the latest British Household survey showing that 26% of men had drunk more than eight units of alcohol a day in the last year and 16% of women more than six units, it’s likely that every FTSE-100 company has some serious drinkers trying to hide their problem.

One who failed to hold down his job was Percy, a business high-flier in his early career, who created a national packaging company. “I thought that success would bring happiness, contentment and self-worth, but it didn’t. The more successful I became, the more I didn’t feel ‘right’ and the more I drank,” he says.

“I thought I was drinking to celebrate, to get over disappointments and to deal with stress. But, actually, I was drinking to fill some void that existed within me, a feeling of incompleteness and inadequacy.”

Percy lost his business before he realised ­ in “a moment of clarity and sanity” ­ that he had to stop drinking before it destroyed him completely. He finally turned around his life with the help of Alcoholics Anonymous.

O’Donnell is concerned that some companies’ culture may encourage heavy drinking. “I worry about the use of booze as a lubricant in sales departments and so on,” he says. “I’ve been told about a couple of City firms where they do entertaining until two or three in the morning. You hear about visits to lap dancing clubs and you know that people are not going to those places sober. I think the idea of using booze as a lubricant while you are entertaining clients is very harmful.”

Heavy-drinking employees try to hide their problems, but they’re not difficult to spot. Regular absenteeism, particularly after weekends, and frequent sick notes complaining of headaches or gastritis are indications, O’Donnell points out.

He urges firms to take an initial sympathetic approach. “Lots of companies have policies, which give people with drink problems the freedom to get help. But employers need to know they are taking the help and getting better as a result of it,” he says. “There is a myth that once someone is a boozer, you have to get rid of them. There are plenty of people around who have beaten the problem.”

But until they do, FDs must pick up the bill for the morning after.

vnunet

Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Alcoholic jailed for breaching ASBO

An alcoholic given a community sentence for breaching an anti-social behaviour order (Asbo) is behind bars today after falling foul of the order for a second time.

Michael Debenham was given the Asbo on May 20, banning him from drinking in the streets of Ipswich and sleeping in the town's parks.

But the 54-year-old breached the order just hours later and appeared at South East Suffolk Magistrates' Court earlier this month to be sentenced for the offence.

He was given a 12-month community order with a supervision requirement and was released from the court, only to breach the order that very evening.

Andy Solomon, anti-social behaviour network manager for Ipswich, said: “At 10.15pm on June 6 he was found under the influence of alcohol in a public place.

“He was drunk outside the Corn Exchange, carrying a plastic bottle of cider and making obscene gestures to a police car.”

Debenham, of no fixed abode, has since appeared before the town's magistrates again where he admitted the breach.

He was sentenced to six months in prison and his Asbo and community order were to continue on his release.

Court officials had previously criticised the decision to issue Debenham with an Asbo with district judge David Cooper saying it was “fantastic” that the order could make being drunk and disorderly a crime punishable with a prison sentence.

But Mr Solomon said Debenham was scaring members of the public and children and the Asbo was a means of protecting them.

Speaking of Debenham's imprisonment, he said: “I hope he can now access the services he needs to deal with his problem.”

Debenham is believed to be planning to appeal his sentence.

Evening Star

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Alcoholism's genetic link

Two interweaving factors leading to alcoholism have been detected by scientists in Washington.

Personality and parental alcoholism have been observed to interact to influence an individual’s risk of becoming an alcoholic.

A personality trait called ‘novelty seeking’ and parental alcoholism are among the new findings that can increase the risk or protect against developing the addiction.

The researchers found that a high novelty seeking tendency is a strong risk factor for alcoholism among children of alcoholics (COAs).

Alternatively, low novelty seeking proved to protect against the risk of developing alcoholism among the COAs.

The authors also take note of ‘disinhibitory personality traits’ that refer to risk-taking, exploratory, thrill-seeking and sometimes impulsive personality characteristics.

They found that children, most notably boys, who display these traits have a high likelihood of becoming alcoholics as adults.

The findings also indicate that this risk is further enhanced if these children have an alcoholic parent.

"Novelty seeking is not in and of itself a dangerous thing," said Richard Grucza, an epidemiologist at Washington University School of Medicine.

"[Tour de France champion whose father was an alcoholic] Lance Armstrong is a good example of somebody with high novelty seeking - he was seriously injured in a bike accident in high school.

“Somebody more risk-averse or less enamoured of the thrill of speed probably would have focused on running or swimming after that.

“But obviously, he is someone who has channelled these tendencies in non-destructive ways,” Grucza observed.

Kevin Conway, associate director of the Division of Clinical Neuroscience and Behavioral Research at the National Institute on Drug Abuse, added: "Although familial alcoholism has long been known to increase the risk of alcoholism in offspring, the risk is not 100 per cent.

"This indicates that family history by itself is only one of many variables in the 'equation' predicting alcoholism.

“Some variables increase the probability of alcoholism in offspring, such as exposure to heavy drinking, or antisocial behaviour in parents or offspring, whereas others decrease this risk, such as warm parent-child relationships and certain forms of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene.”

The team analysed data collected from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism of 1,111 adult siblings of patients seeking treatment for alcoholism.

The results refute the widely accepted claim that alcoholics suffer from an ‘addictive personality’.

"Some rethinking of the relation between personality and addiction may be in order," added Grucza.

"Rather than thinking about an 'addictive personality,' it is important to think about how personality might influence a person's response to other genetic and environmental risk factors.”

Results were published in the July issue of Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research.

Thursday, June 22, 2006

Crackdown on underage drinking

A Booze-Blitz by trading standards officers saw two sales assistants from East Grinstead fined after selling alcohol to children.

Both were slapped with an £80 on-the-spot fine after two 15-year-olds successfully purchased booze.

Six retailers were targeted in the undercover operation earlier this month run by West Sussex County Council trading standards officers and Sussex Police.

The council is to organise more swoops as the school holidays approach in an effort to crack down on rogue retailers who sell alcohol to underage customers.

County councillor Lionel Barnard, the cabinet member for public protection, said: "I welcome this initiative by our trading standards team and Sussex Police because there's no doubting the link between binge drinking and antisocial behaviour.

"Selling alcohol to under-18s is irresponsible and a criminal offence.

"Those caught breaking the law must take responsibility for their actions and face the consequences."

David Beardsley,acting head of trading standards,said: "We have an ongoing programme of undercover operations, which we will be stepping up during the school holidays.

"We urge all retailers to 'Think 21' because it can be difficult to tell the age of teenagers from appearance alone.Anyone who appears under 21 should be challenged for ID,rather than just under 18.

"We would also encourage parents and the public to tell the Trading Standards Service when they suspect that sales are being made to underage youngsters in their locality."

ic Surrey Online

Monday, June 19, 2006

Agency runs group sober houses in Nashua

The lifestyle of a homeless alcoholic drove David Cull straight to sobriety 21 years ago.

For the past several years, Cull, 50, has offered other recovering addicts and alcoholics a smoother path. Cull runs two group sober houses in the city through the agency he founded, Soul Purpose Living.

The agency’s two homes, the Hope House for men, off East Dunstable Road, and the Faith House for women, near Broad Street, are both single-family houses in residential neighborhoods west of the F.E. Everett Turnpike. Cull asked that the exact locations of the houses not be published, to help keep residents secure from old acquaintances of darker days.

“The idea is to integrate ourselves back into society,” Cull said. “We’re not bad people. We’re just people who, because of addiction, have done some bad things.”

“People with substance abuse, they made mistakes and they hit the wrong road, they don’t need to pay that price forever,” he said.

Cull has been running sober houses in Nashua since 2002, operating as Soul Purpose Living since 2004, he said. Soul Purpose runs two of the state’s five official organized group homes for recovering addicts, and the only one for women.

The state could stand to have more, said Joseph Harding, director of drug and alcohol abuse prevention for the Department of Health and Human Services. Addicts need stable, safe housing to aid their recovery, he said.

“Housing is an important issue . . .

particularly for people who are in early recovery. A lot of times they’ve lost their jobs, and burned whatever bridges they had,” Harding said. “They need decent housing to help them get back on their feet . . . and it’s important for people in recovery to have good supports in place.”

There is no state oversight for sober houses, Harding said. Unlike addiction treatment centers and counselors, they aren’t licensed and don’t work under contract with the state, Harding said.

“We don’t regulate them,” Harding said. “I’m not sure if it’s either a good thing or a bad thing. I think it’s important that our treatment providers are regulated and that we hold them to high standards.”

Sober houses don’t provide any formal treatment, however, just support. Recovering addicts need plenty of that, Harding said.

“I think it can be a very good thing,” he said, “but like anything else, something can be good or bad depending on how it’s run.”

Providing structure

Soul Purpose Living has financial and organizational problems as an agency, but the group homes themselves appear well-run. The houses are tidy, and residents seem enthusiastic about the program. The many rules are posted prominently.

Cull relies on house managers at each residence to help him manage the houses, he said. Faith House has room for nine women and is currently full, while Hope House has room for 11 men and currently houses seven, he said.

To be eligible for consideration, residents must have a criminal record clear of any violent crimes, including sexual assaults, and have completed a 30-day inpatient treatment program or a treatment program in jail or prison.

“The treatment programs give them the tools, and then they come here,” Cull said.

Soul Purpose doesn’t offer any treatment itself, but residents are required to attend Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous meetings daily for the first 90 days and at least four times a week thereafter. They also must submit to random drug and alcohol tests and abide by an 11 p.m. curfew, Cull said.

The houses have a simple “three-strikes and you’re out” policy for violations, Cull said, and residents who relapse into drinking or drugging are dismissed immediately.

“There’s structure here. There’s rules,” Cull said, adding later, “You need a lot of structure when you’re trying to reclaim lives.”

Soul Purpose collects $135 weekly rent from each resident, and residents work to support themselves. Residents all are required to pitch in with household chores and to attend group, family-style meetings to hash out any issues or conflicts.

“This is a family atmosphere. These people are family. We need to treat each other accordingly, just like any family,” Cull said.

Cull and the house managers evaluate new residents and suggest various programs to help with any particular needs. Cull attends monthly meetings of the Greater Nashua Continuum of Care, a network of area social service agencies, to keep in touch with other providers who can help residents.

Residents who have suffered from domestic violence can work with counselors at Bridges Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Support. People with other mental health issues can get help through Community Council. The Nashua Pastoral Care Center offers household finance classes, and the Nashua Soup Kitchen teaches job search skills.

Cull expects residents to stay at least six months, and at most two years, he said.

“We don’t want them to stay here two years. We have to look at where they’re coming from and how they’re doing, and just like a mother bird, we have to push them out of the nest,” he said.

Cull estimates that some 250 people have come and gone through Soul Purpose houses over the last several years.

“Out of that, we probably have about a 70 percent success rate,” Cull said, defining success as simply staying sober while staying in the house.

Group living is an important element of the program, Cull said. People with more experience in clean living can mentor newer residents, and they all encourage each other.

“Everyone here wants help,” Hope House resident Michael Donlon said. “Everyone here is supportive.”

Donlon, 23, came to Hope House after a stint in Farnum House in Manchester, which in turn followed several months in jail after he was arrested for dealing drugs to support his own habit.

“I really liked what it was about,” Donlon said. “You can’t just come here and pay rent and hang out. You have to be active in the program.

“They have halfway houses; this is like a three-quarters house,” Donlon said.

Too often, Cull said, treatment centers and housing for recovering addicts get shunted into the poorest neighborhoods, where crime and drugs are more common.

“Why shouldn’t they have a nice house, and take care of it?” Cull asked, adding later, “Living in a neighborhood really gives these people a sense of responsibility, ownership and taking care of things. That’s why I wanted the house out in a neighborhood. Why should we send all our ‘problems’ to places downtown?”

Both Soul Purpose homes are located on moderately busy streets in the midst of typically suburban neighborhoods. Neighbors in both areas opposed the homes when Cull went before the city zoning board last year. At the time, city zoning rules allowed no more than six unrelated persons in a single family house.

Cull applied for a variance to house up to nine persons in both houses, but the zoning board turned him down after a hearing April 12, 2005.

Several neighbors around each of the houses spoke against the variance request, complaining of noise, traffic and the overall effects of a group home in the midst of a single-family neighborhood. Minutes of the meeting, including their comments, are available along with this story on The Telegraph’s Web site.

“When we filed, everyone was against us. They were all against us,” Cull said of the neighborhood opposition. “I’ll take some of that blame. . . . They’re not educated. We hadn’t explained things to them.”

The zoning board agreed to reconsider its decision, but rather than go through another hearing, Cull said he arranged for lawyers from the federal Housing and Urban Development office to meet with city officials and settle the matter.

The city has since changed its zoning rules, to allow one person for every 300 square feet in a single-family residence, according to the city’s planning office, and both Soul Purpose houses fall within that rule. Cull hopes that the group’s efforts to keep up their property and run clean houses will help ease neighbors’ fears.

“I think their fears that they’re going to have drug addicts raid their houses and shoot them, I think might be gone,” he said.

Rocky road

Cull mostly grew up around New England, he said, and he’s lived in Nashua for several years.

“I’ve moved 35 times in three countries. My father was an alcoholic. . . . My whole family was alcoholics,” he said. “I went to college, and I drank all through college.”

Cull had a girlfriend and a daughter on his way down to rock bottom, he said. That came in 1985, when his girlfriend demanded that they talk about his problem. He agreed, and got drunk to fortify himself for the occasion.

“I made believe that I was OK, and I was sober,” Cull said. “As soon as she looked at me, she saw I was drunk.”

His girlfriend kicked Cull to the curb, and after wearing out his welcome with various friends and acquaintances, he found himself homeless in Lowell, Mass.

“I tried to live as a homeless person,” he said. “I ended up on the street for one week, and I said, ‘This is too much work.’ ”

“They know the soup schedules, the kitchen, the shelters, they shower at the YMCA. It’s a lot of work,” he said.

Cull checked himself into Lowell General Hospital for detoxification, and later moved from a holding facility to a halfway house, he said.

“Back in those days, you could just walk into detox,” he said. “Now, it’s a six-week waiting period. Four to six weeks.”

Cull eventually bounced back. He was married for four years in the 1990s, and worked as a steel worker until getting laid off in 2002. Cull bought the men’s house after his divorce, and it became an informal sober house, as he shared it with three and sometimes four other people he knew from AA, he said.

“We had a number of us that were staying sober living there,” he said.

Cull began working to formally manage the sober houses after being laid off from his job. He formed Soul Purpose Living, and he’s been struggling ever since to build a financial foundation for the agency.

“I just felt spiritually that I needed to do more,” he said, adding later, “When I felt like this is what I needed to do, it brought my spiritual level up.”

Cull started Soul Purpose along with a former partner as a for-profit property management company, and later reorganized the company as a nonprofit, he said. Cull credits a former business partner for the Soul Purpose name and credo: “The soul purpose in life is to help people.”

In the long run, Cull hopes that the group housing model can be applied to other areas, such as people with mental or physical disabilities, to help teach independent living skills.

“Once this program works, we can use this as a model for all the populations with needs,” Cull said.

“I see the possibilities of people who don’t have the luxuries that we have, the blessings that we have, and I see the possibilities that even the people who don’t have what we have, they can have what we have,” he said, “but it’s going to take work, resources and housing to do it.”

Nashua Telegraph

Sunday, June 18, 2006

Half-pint limit urged for drivers under 21

Drink-drive limits for young people should be reduced to the equivalent of half a pint of beer while staying at the current level for the rest of the population, according to a new report that could shape the direction of Britain's alcohol strategy.

Ban Baumberg, the author of the Institute of Alcohol Studies report, said: 'Inexperienced drivers are more at risk of situations that endanger both themselves and the wider public and in these situations, the last thing they need is impaired judgment and reflexes from drinking. We studied some American states that put extra restrictions on young and inexperienced drivers, and we found that approach was highly effective in reducing the number of motor vehicle fatalities, particularly among the youngest drivers.'

The report calls for a limit of 20mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood for young people under 21 and 50mg for everyone else. The current UK limit is 80mg. With 50mg roughly equivalent to a pint of beer, young drivers could be over the limit after drinking just half a pint of strong lager. In addition, the report also urges the ending of alcohol education in schools, unless part of a wider programme, and wants tighter restrictions on alcohol advertising.

The report recommends training programmes for bartenders to help them identify those over the drink-drive limit and to give them advice on how to refuse to continue serving such people and provide them with alternative transport.

Baumberg said: 'Training programmes run in Australia and the Netherlands have achieved a significant improvement in discouraging over-consumption by drinkers and have seen bartenders successfully encourage drinkers to switch to alternative, non-alcoholic beverages.'

The report will be used by the European Commission to formulate its alcohol strategy, to be published in the autumn, and comes just a week after experts issued a warning that Britain is facing a health timebomb as binge-drinking increases. 'Alcohol is public health enemy Number Three in Britain, behind tobacco and high blood pressure,' said Christine Godfrey, a professor at the Centre for Health Economics at the University of York.

Binge-drinking in girls has increased and is now the second highest in Europe. In boys that rate has stayed constant, but overall at least a quarter of our 15- to 16-year-olds will go on three drinking sessions every month.

The Observer

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Moscow tries to cut cheap alcohol deaths

Russia announced drastic measures yesterday to stop its men dying from drinking perfume and nail-varnish remover - but it is the country's women who may lose out.

For decades Russian men unable to afford vodka have sought alternatives to satisfy their craving, consuming anything from alcohol-based cosmetics to wet-wipes.

In an attempt to curb at least some of the practice, the head of the state's consumer watchdog, Gennady Onishchenko, has announced that all perfumes and cosmetics will require a special licence from July 1.

The intention, he says, is to price unscrupulous traders who deliberately sell cheap perfume to alcoholics out of the market. But industry representatives say the measure is so prohibitive that perfume could disappear from many shops within a month.

Government statistics show that cosmetic and household products make up 20 per cent of all alcohol consumed in Russia and are a major factor in many of the 40,000 deaths every year attributable to alcohol poisoning.

Telegraph

Sunday, June 11, 2006

How Bill Wilson Invented Alcoholics Anonymous

Seventy-one years ago today ( 10 June 2006 ), outside the Akron, Ohio, city hospital, Dr. Robert Smith swigged from a bottle of beer. He and his friend Bill Wilson had just mapped out a new way to cure alcoholism, and they were sure it would work. Smith only needed one last drink to prevent hand tremors on the job. It sounds like the recidivist’s lame excuse, but the beer did turn out to be Smith’s last. The date was June 10, 1935—now known as the official birthday of Alcoholics Anonymous.

If Wilson’s story sounds familiar, even clichéd, now, it’s only because he popularized the idea that “sharing” one’s story is a necessary part of overcoming alcoholism. Every drinker’s trajectory is different, of course, but Wilson helped define what we now recognize as the basic plot points of addiction.

By the time he got a call from an old drinking buddy in 1934, Wilson had, in AA parlance, hit bottom. In 1905, when he was only 10, his father had left his mother; his maternal grandmother raised him and his sister in Vermont. He took his first drink at a dinner party in 1917, after he joined the Army as a second lieutenant. Following an uneventful stint in Europe during World War I, he moved to New York City, got married, and made a small fortune on Wall Street. He also drank for days on end.

The crash of 1929 all but ruined him, both financially and emotionally. His drinking prevented him from keeping a job, and he and his wife, Lois, had to move in with her father in Brooklyn. He started bar fights, blacked out, and stole money for booze from Lois’s purse. He was hospitalized after several benders and always vowed to quit drinking, but he never could. He had just returned from a stay in Manhattan’s expensive Charles B. Towns Hospital when Ebby Thatcher, a friend from boarding school, paid him a visit in November 1934. The two had spent many liquor-drenched evenings together over the years, and Wilson looked forward to another. But Thatcher was a changed man. He had joined the Oxford Group Movement and gotten sober.

The Oxford Group was the brainchild of Dr. Frank Buchman, a Lutheran minister. Popular in the 1920s on college campuses (including Oxford University, from which it took its name) and in upscale neighborhoods, the group promoted Buchman’s belief in divine guidance: One should wait for God to give direction in every aspect of life (it wasn’t about alcoholism or any other single problem) and surrender to that advice. Buchman’s program emphasized public confession of sin during meetings at members’ houses, making restitution to those sinned against, and promoting the group to the public. The group’s individualistic bent—if God’s guidance could solve everyone’s problems, social movements seemed useless—divorced it from activism or politics. But when Buchman told a reporter in 1936, “I thank heaven for a man like Adolf Hitler, who built a front line of defense against the anti-Christ of Communism,” the Oxford Group’s fortunes started to fall. After Buchman’s death, in 1961, the group all but disappeared. Few remember his name today, but his principles—surrender to divine guidance, confession, and making amends—live on in another unlikely fellowship.

Wilson, an atheist since age 11, dismissed Thatcher’s claims: “Last summer an alcoholic crackpot; now, I suspected, a little cracked about religion.” But a month later, back in a hospital bed in Towns doped on barbiturates and belladonna (which were used to treat alcoholism at the time), Wilson yelled, “If there be a God, let him show himself!” “Suddenly my room blazed with an indescribably white light,” he wrote in 1957. “I was seized with an ecstasy beyond description. Every joy I had known was pale by comparison.” The next day, Thatcher brought him a copy of William James’s The Varieties of Religious Experience, in which James writes that “the only radical remedy . . . for dipsomania is religiomania.” Wilson would devote his life to the idea that surrender to God was the only replacement for surrender to alcohol.

When he got out of the hospital, Wilson not only joined the Oxford Group, he also went on a crusade to convert other drunks, trolling bars and hospitals for potential initiates. He believed that the Group’s principles were the best and maybe only course for curing alcoholism. On a business trip to Akron in the spring of 1935, alone in a hotel lobby and struggling to avoid the bar, he scoured the church directory for the number of the local Oxford Group. An Episcopal minister put him in touch with a woman whose friend, Dr. Robert Smith, was an alcoholic. Smith agreed to meet with Wilson for 15 minutes. They ended up talking for six hours. Smith decided to quit drinking that very night. His wife invited Wilson to move in for the duration of his stay in Akron, and the two men devoted their free time to the Oxford Group and enlightening other drinkers.

Around the coffee table at night, the two debated the best ways to reform alcoholics. But Smith himself had not yet tasted his last drink. In June he returned from a conference in Atlantic City so soused that his wife worried he wouldn’t be able to perform a scheduled surgery in three days. But after bed rest and gallons of coffee, when the time came Smith was ready. Wilson dropped him off at the hospital on June 10, 1935, and gave him a beer to steady his hands. That was the last drink of Smith’s life, and the moment Alcoholics Anonymous was born.

Before Wilson returned to New York, he and Smith helped rehabilitate two alcoholics, who began attending Oxford Group meetings. This “alcoholic squadron of the Akron Oxford Group,” as they called themselves, were the first members of what would become AA. Back home, Wilson began opening his living room on Tuesday nights to a contingent of alcoholics from the New York Oxford Group. But the two camps tended to clash. The nonalcoholics resented Wilson’s concentrating his attention on a minority clique, while the alcoholics chafed under the Oxford Group’s aggressive, authoritarian atmosphere. “These ideas had to be fed with teaspoons rather than by buckets,” Wilson later wrote. In 1937 Wilson decided to sever his faction entirely from the Oxford Group.

More important, the Catholic Church hated Buchman, and Wilson didn’t want to alienate Catholic alcoholics. He didn’t want to alienate anybody, in fact, a feat that proved difficult when he began to codify his process. The twelve steps he listed in the self-published Alcoholics Anonymous (also known as the “Big Book”) in 1939 were really just a restatement of the Oxford Group’s tenets. The ideas of personal powerlessness and divine guidance appear in six steps (for example, Step 1, “We admitted we were powerless over alcohol—that our lives had become unmanageable,” and Step 3, “Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him”); confession and restitution permeate five steps (e.g., Step 5, “Admitted to God, to ourselves and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs,” and Step 8, “Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all”); while the last step promotes the group’s beliefs (“Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics, and to practice these principles in all our affairs”).

The agnostic members of the New York group objected to Wilson’s references to God and feared driving away unreligious new members. To appease them, Wilson deleted the phrase “on our knees” from “Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings” in Step 7, substituted “a power greater than ourselves” for “God” in Step 2, and added “as we understand him” after “God” in Steps 3 and 11. But half of the steps still mention “God,” “Him,” or a higher power.

AA professes to be spiritual rather than religious. Wilson tried to explain the distinction in a chapter of Alcoholics Anonymous entitled “We Agnostics”: “As soon as we were able to lay aside prejudice and express even a willingness to believe in a Power greater than ourselves, we commenced to get results, even though it was impossible for any of us to fully define or comprehend that Power, which is God. Much to our relief, we discovered we did not need to consider another’s conception of God. Our own conception, however inadequate, was sufficient to make the approach and to effect a contact with Him. As soon as we admitted the possible existence of a Creative Intelligence, a Spirit of the Universe underlying the totality of things, we began to be possessed of a new sense of power and direction. . . . [L]ay aside prejudice, even against organized religion. We have learned that whatever the human frailties of various faiths may be, those faiths have given purpose and direction to millions.”

In 1939 alcoholics in Cleveland decided to form their own chapter. They took the title of Wilson’s book as their name, becoming the first group to call itself Alcoholics Anonymous. But even after the publication of the Big Book, the organization grew slowly. Its early members came mostly from the middle class. After all, the founders were a surgeon and a Wall Street trader. Wilson and Smith continued to convert alcoholics on barstools and in hospital beds, but membership didn’t take off until The Saturday Evening Post ran a laudatory article on the organization in March 1941, under the headline “Freed Slaves of Drink, Now They Free Others.” AA mushroomed from two chapters and 100 members in 1939 to 360 chapters and 10,000 members in 1944.

The disease theory of alcoholism helped boost the numbers. In the nineteenth century, most people saw alcoholism as a moral failing, but doctors had already begun to wonder if it didn’t have a physiological basis. Wilson’s doctor mentioned to him that he thought alcoholics suffered from something like an allergy to alcohol, and Wilson helped promote the idea to the American public. Although many dispute that theory today, it has undoubtedly removed some of the stigma from alcoholism, making it less shameful for alcoholics to seek treatment.

As the organization ballooned in the 1940s, Wilson decided it needed to govern itself. He set up a general conference of elected delegates from local groups, which would, in turn, elect representatives to a national assembly. After implementing the plan in 1950, he said, “I became entirely sure that Alcoholics Anonymous was at last safe—even from me.”

Smith died of prostate cancer in November 1950; Wilson, a lifelong smoker, succumbed to emphysema-related pneumonia in January 1971. Since then, their 12 steps have been adapted to treat everything from compulsive gambling to overeating. The group’s near-institutionalization in American society has, however, brought it its share of controversy. Courts often order perpetrators of alcohol-related crimes to attend AA, and some have argued that given AA’s religious underpinnings, their sentences violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment. In 1997 the New York Court of Appeals agreed, ruling that “adherence to the AA fellowship entails engagement in religious activity and religious proselytization.”

In recent decades, secular alternatives to AA have sprung up around the country, as have movements advocating moderate drinking and control rather than abstinence and admission of powerlessness. But AA remains the most popular self-help group by far, boasting more than two million members worldwide in over 97,000 groups.

American Heritage

Saturday, June 10, 2006

Sobriety can include medication

Drugs no longer taboo; addicts frequently have mental illness, doctors say

The treatment plan used to be simple, if not easy: A recovering alcoholic was to follow the 12 steps of Alcoholics Anonymous and steer clear of any drugs that affect mental state.

Today, physicians and addiction researchers look at the alcoholic in a different way and consider the use of drugs that AA founders Bill Wilson and Dr. Robert Smith never dreamed of.

At least half of the nation's 8 million alcoholics also suffer from a mental illness, which can be treated with anti-depressants, anti-anxiety drugs and other medications. And new drugs have come out that address the craving for alcohol itself.

Dr. Victoria Sanelli, medical director of Summa Health System's Ignatia Hall Acute Alcohol and Drug Treatment Center, says the issue of treating alcoholics with drugs is a complicated one.

Most people, she says, understand that prescription anti-depressants and other drugs sometimes can help the recovering alcoholic. But there are those who take a traditional no-drugs stance.

``There are still some hard-liners who say you shouldn't be on any of that stuff,'' she says.

AA, which is celebrating its annual Founders Day in Akron this weekend, cautions alcoholics about using drugs to deal with the ``aches and discomforts of everyday living.'' But its pamphlet ``The AA Member -- Medications & Other Drugs,'' published in 1984, also provides examples of alcoholics who need to use strong medications under medical supervision.

Sanelli routinely has to figure out whether a patient's mental health problems or the alcohol dependence came first: Is a newly detoxed alcoholic anxious because he or she is without alcohol or because there is an underlying anxiety disorder?

``There is disagreement as to whether we should make them stop (drinking) first and then treat them for depression and anxiety or treat it all at the same time,'' she says.

Sanelli prefers to delay prescribing mood-managing drugs to a newly recovering alcoholic. That way, she says, it's easier to determine if the symptoms will pass naturally after the first weeks of recovery.

But for some alcoholic patients, the anxiety or depression won't abate without a course of psychotropic drugs. Patients with a genetic predisposition to a mood disorder will need to be on medication for the rest of their life.

Mental connection

Tina, a middle-aged, area alcoholic who asked that her last name be withheld to protect her privacy, understands well the connection between alcoholism and mental disorders.

She has had a rocky sobriety the past several years and at the same time has been treated medically for depression.

``Alcohol helps with the depression,'' she says, ``because you drink yourself into oblivion.''

At the same time, the drinking makes everything worse.'

``I'd get real depressed when I drank,'' she says.

Dr. Robert Liebelt, a former director of Ignatia Hall who's now addiction medicine director for the Summit County Alcohol, Drug and Mental Health Board, estimates that 50 percent to 60 percent of people who have alcohol problems also have psychiatric problems.

Psychiatric testing

Liebelt says he and his colleagues are working on a plan that will require certain agencies that receive funding from the alcohol, drug and mental health board to add specialized drug and psychiatric testing to new clients.

Under the plan, a patient who wants help for alcohol addiction at Interval Brotherhood Home, for instance, would automatically be screened for mental health problems. And a person who needs mental health services at Portage Path Behavioral Health would be screened for a substance abuse problem.

The plan, Liebelt says, will be presented to the board in August.

Anti-craving drugs -- acamprosate or naltrexone -- are another approach to treating alcoholics.

Sanelli says she rarely prescribes them. Her patients, who receive treatment and go to Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, don't seem to require them, she explains.

However, according to the Journal of the American Medical Association, which on May 6 published long-awaited results to a national study comparing different ways of treating alcoholism, the majority of the nation's alcoholics don't get treatment for their addiction.

The journal-published research, known as COMBINE, was a four-year study of 1,400 abstinent alcoholics, none of whom had major mental health problems. One of the findings was that there are several effective ways to treat alcoholics, including a system in which a primary care physician provides short, frequent ``medical management'' sessions with a patient and prescribes naltrexone.

Dr. Robert Anthenelli, an addiction psychiatrist and nationally known researcher who directs the Substance Dependence Program at the Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center, says the study's findings present hope and broader options for those who are alcohol dependent.

``What this (study) hopefully will lead to,'' he says, ``is that people understand that there are multiple ways and multiple modalities to treat alcohol dependence.''

Part of treatment

The drugs can mesh very well in a treatment plan that includes AA meetings, Anthenelli says, but they also provide an option for someone who refuses traditional treatment strategies.

The success of naltrexone with medical management is nothing to discount, says Akron General Medical Center internist Dr. Paul Lecat. But he's not ready to start writing many prescriptions.

``You can argue with certainty that there is a benefit,'' Lecat says. ``The question is, is that amount of benefit worth the risk, the cost? For some people, it probably will be. I think you can say the drugs are an option.''

Sanelli says the question of using medications to treat alcoholism is part of a much larger issue.

Whether an alcoholic is on a prescription medication or not, he or she needs to shoot for much more than not drinking, she says.

``Just being abstinent is what we refer to as a dry drunk,'' Sanelli says.

``It's about emotional stability. For recovery, we're also looking at improvement of relationships, self-esteem and spirituality.''

Beacon Journal

Friday, June 09, 2006

Police’s tough line to beat the binge drinkers

A Clampdown on excessive drinking is at the heart of the biggest ever campaign to be launched by Wiltshire police force today.

Operation XS was launched at midnight, just hours before England's opening World Cup match against Paraguay.

But unlike the world's biggest football tournament, the campaign will not just last a few weeks.

Statistics released by the police force show that crimes recorded as alcohol-related have increased 10-fold in the last two years.

In April 2004, 26 alcohol-related crimes were recorded in Wiltshire, but in April this year, that figure had soared to 266.

Central Swindon was identified as one of the county's worst trouble spots, with 154 alcohol-related offences being carried out in the last year (2005-06), while three out of five premises subjected to test purchasing by Wiltshire police and trading standards sold alcohol to a minor.

"Think twice B4 getting trashed" is the message officers want to get across to revellers over the next seven months.

During that time, officers will be visiting pubs, clubs and off-licences to ensure licensing laws are being properly applied, as well as conducting high-profile patrols in known violent crime and public disorder hotspots.

And that will see hundreds of police officers patrolling streets across the county with a zero-tolerance approach to anyone who commits a crime as a result of excessive drinking.

"This is not about the police being killjoys or puritanical about alcohol," said Wiltshire Constabulary's Assistant Chief Constable Peter Vaughan.

"The message is about moderation, about the problems that arise from excess and how in some cases those problems prove fatal.

"We've timed this campaign to kick off at the same time as the World Cup and let no one be in any doubt I want England to do well.

"I want to see a great tournament. But I do not want to be picking up the pieces of shattered lives at full-time."

Each month the police campaign, which will be run by Chief Inspector Norman McKeaveney, will centre on a different aspect of excessive drinking including violent crime, drink driving, the effect on health, drink spiking, binge drinking, anti-social behaviour and the effect of alcohol-related crime on the emergency services.

The message will be reinforced by a radio campaign voiced by The Office star Ralph Ineson, who plays Chris Finch, and there will also be screen flashes on cashpoint machines and message advertising on pay and display parking tickets.

"OP XS is not a publicity stunt," added Asst Chief Con Vaughan.

"And it is not a 24-hour wonder. We will be taking firm action against anyone who drinks to excess and commits crime tonight, tomorrow and the days, weeks and months thereafter. Welcome to OP XS."

drinkresponsibly campaigner Clive Loveday has thrown his full support behind Wiltshire police's OP XS.

Mr Loveday's 19-year-old son Matthew died on New Year's Day in 2005 after a New Year's Eve party in Buckinghamshire.

He was five times over the drink-drive limit after being challenged to drink shots of the aniseed liquor Ouzo as part of a drinking game.

During the party he drank up to 20 shots of the potent drink before passing out. He later died.

Mr Loveday, of Old Town, has spent the last 18 months educating youngsters about the dangers of binge drinking and he believes the newly-launched police campaign will further emphasise the message he works so hard to get across.

"I think OP XS is a positive move," he said.

"It is helping me really as I can't get around to everybody to warn them about the dangers of binge drinking. I think the police have put their campaign across in the right way.

We all like a drink, it has been part of our society for quite some time and will be for some time yet.

"Matthew didn't know what drink was going to do to him and I just hope young people can learn from what happened to him.

"I think my message would be, enjoy a drink, but make sure you do it responsibly."

This Is Wiltshire

Thursday, June 08, 2006

Kids' anti-drink project in line to win national award

Glasgow is leading the way in the battle to deter youngsters from binge drinking.

A small-scale voluntary project that educates primary school children about safe alcohol use has been nominated for a national award.

The Greater Easterhouse Alcohol Awareness Project has reached around 1000 young people in the east end and is Scotland's most extensive alcohol programme for primary schools.

Children aged 10 to 12 are encouraged to explore their feelings about alcohol through art work, discussions and role play during the intensive four-week programme, run by full-time project staff who go into the classroom.

Evidence shows that, in the transition between primary and secondary school, the proportion of children using alcohol rises from one in 10 to one in four.

Ann Kearney, Project Worker, said: "Children today are extremely streetwise.

"Quite a lot of the kids have experience of alcohol. Most have tasted it but around 80% of the responses we get are negative. The pictures they draw show gang violence, people lying on the streets.

"It is very important to get them at an early age. By the time they get to high school it's too late.

"We have dealt with youngsters in first year where it is very evident alcohol use has become a serious problem.

"We are not going in there telling them not to drink alcohol because it's been proved that this doesn't work.

"We are giving them the information in the hope they will make sensible choices."

A recent study showed Scots children as young as 14 were among those treated for alcoholic liver disease, which is normally seen much later in life.

Around 46 children of that age were admitted to hospital dangerously drunk in 2004-2005 with another 152 aged under 18 were admitted for the same reason.

The Glasgow project also holds information sessions for parents but Ann says the response so far has been lukewarm.

She said: "For some parents it might be too close to home to talk about, but we're hoping to attract more."

The project has been so successful there are plans to roll it out across the whole of the city and staff also hope to set up school advice centres, where pupils can get advice on alcohol-related issues.

It is the only Scottish scheme to be nominated in the Mentor UK Alcohol Misuse Prevention Awards Schemes.

Eric Carlin, Chief Executive of Mentor UK, said: "Alcohol misuse can be incredibly damaging to young lives, and the Great Easterhouse Alcohol Awareness Project is doing vital work to help young people make sensible choices."

Evening Times

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Large wine glasses 'turn people into alcoholics'

The trend for 'supersize' wine glasses is turning young people into unwitting alcoholics, an addiction expert warned yesterday.

In pubs and bars today, wine is often served in huge glasses able to hold up to a third of a bottle of wine.

Experts fear this means people consume far more than they realise and it puts them in danger of becoming dependent on alcohol.

The warnings are particularly pertinent for young women as they are more likely to drink wine than men.

Latest figures show the level of binge drinking among women has soared in recent years, and the number drinking more than 35 units of alcohol a week - against a recommended limit of 14 - has trebled since 1990.

Until a few years ago the standard measure of wine was the 125ml glass, but now many pubs use 175ml or even 250ml glasses.

People have become so accustomed to goblet-style glasses that even at home, many people use them when having a drink to unwind at the end of the day.

Nick Gully, director of addiction services at the Priory Clinic in Roehampton, said: 'They fill them up and believe it is OK because they are only having one glass but that can now amount to a third of a bottle.

'If they have a small glass they feel cheated.

'It's the same in pubs. Someone goes to a bar and feel cheated if they are given a small glass. People expect larger measures. 'They have become normalised and with it the amount of alcohol we drink has gone up and has become normalised by society as well.'

He said five or 10 years ago the average age of patients visiting the clinic, which has treated countless celebrities, was 45 but now it was 35 and younger.

'We were used to treating people who when we looked had an underlying psychological trauma or a major psychological problem which had contributed to their addiction but we are now seeing patients who don't have that history,' he said.

'Inadvertently developed a problem'

'They are well-adjusted functioning people who have inadvertently and unwittingly developed a problem over time.

'Often they will say that they do not have a problem and they only drink one or two glasses of wine a night.

'But when we look at them in depth they have a psychological and physical dependence on alcohol.'

His warnings echo those issued last year by the editor of the Good Pub Guide.

Alisdair Aird called for all pubs selling wine to adopt 125ml glasses as their standard size.

Mr Aird said customers were often charged too much money for wine served in larger glasses.

'People are unwittingly putting themselves over the limit and also having to spend more for wine which they perhaps don't want,' he said.

'Your first reaction is to think it is generous, but it is a concealed cost increase which may be putting you at some risk.'

According to the Department of Health says a 175ml glass of red or white wine contains roughly two units of alcohol, depending on the strength.

Men are advised not to drink more than three to four units of alcohol per day and women should drink no more than two to three units per day.

Daily Mail

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

AA gives new lease of life to addicts

Vadodara: Alcoholics in dry Gujarat? Alright, so bootleggers thrive here and there is an Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) as well.

While the AA Surat has 150 members, Vadodara and Ahmedabad have registered 30 members each. And their tales of rising from the sordid depths of drunkenness are similar to other states where bars are legal.

"While my son received laurels for the world championship trophy in skating for three consecutive years, I was least bothered. I did not even appreciate him. I was busy drinking and it was the only thing that gave me a high,"says William who works in a multinational company.

He has not touched the liquor ever since he joined AA last May. "I was an alcoholic, but was always afraid to accept the fact in public because it would bring social disgrace. I decided to quit drinking but could never do it.

I joined AA because I was told my identity would not be revealed a n d that deaddiction was the only motive here,"said doctor Jagdish, a physician.

AA has been helping those addicted through examples set by the alcoholics who have recovered. New members are encouraged to abstain from a drink a day, instead of swearing off "forever".

"I became numb and my hands and legs would shiver if I did not drink even for a day. Then I read about AA in the newspaper and became a member and my life changed,"said Mahendra, a government servant. Bhuria Seth, a private company employee said, "I used to beat my children and wife with hockey sticks and sharp- edged weapons after getting drunk.""Only by working with fellow members in AA did I learn to stay away from alcohol.

In the process, I found a support network to share my experiences with and came out of addiction,"he says. "One can call on the helpline number anytime during the day and join the group, we will guide them,"said one of the AA members. More people are joining the group, as the identity of the members is kept anonymous.

If you think AA only helps alcoholics, then Al-Anon, the fellowship for families of alcoholics also helps wives, mothers, sisters and brothers who have to go through the ordeal of handling tough situations.

Angela, chairman of Al-Anon states, "One needs to accept and forgive alcoholics as they are afflicted by a disease. You have to be patient."

Times of India

Monday, June 05, 2006

We are third biggest drinkers after Finns and Irish

We are the third biggest binge drinkers in Europe, with the average adult going on a bender every 13 days, a study revealed yesterday.

That puts the UK behind Finland and Ireland - but at 28 times a year we do it nearly four times more often than the Italians.

We also spend more on drink than most Europeans, beaten only by Denmark and once again Ireland.

But we manage to knock back only around the EU average of 15 litres a year

More than a quarter of our 15 to 16-year-olds went on at least three booze sessions in the last month alone, said the report.

Binge drinking in girls has increased dramatically and remains the second highest in Europe.

In boys it has stayed constant - but it is only in the UK, Ireland and Finland that girls get drunk more often than boys.

Experts have warned that Britain is facing a health time bomb as the number of binge drinkers continues to rise.

And the report branded alcohol "public health enemy No 3" behind tobacco and high blood pressure.

It said the social cost of alcohol abuse is thought to be around £446 a year for every European household, meaning it has become as high as that for tobacco.

Drink is responsible for more than seven per cent of disability and premature death in the EU. The report by the UK based Institute of Alcohol Studies, funded by the European Commission, is the first comprehensive look at drinking across 15 EU countries.

It found up to nine million children live in families damaged by alcohol.

And it blamed 10,000 drink driving for causing "innocent" deaths.

It is estimated that using tax to raise the price of booze by just 10 per cent could save 9,000 lives in a year.

Britons are less likely to blame alcohol for violence, said the report.

Just over half believe that "anyone may become violent after drinking too much", compared with almost two thirds of the French and three quarters of the Italians.

Srabani Sen, head of Alcohol Concern, said: "This report paints a stark picture of the true impact of alcohol misuse across the EU.

"Far too many lives are lost to alcohol misuse and yet the evidence suggests that many of these deaths could be prevented if governments, including our own, took a few simple steps."

Christine Godfrey, professor of health economics at the University of York, said: "This is the best estimate yet conducted showing the scale of the social costs of alcohol in Europe."

Mirror

Sunday, June 04, 2006

Why do we drink? To get drunk

Most 18-24 year olds just booze to get blitzed and struggle to work because they are too hungover.

Huge numbers of young Scots admit struggling at work because of hangovers, a survey reveals.

Nineteen per cent of all Scots say they have had difficulty at work the morning after the night before.

And that rises to 80 per cent among people aged 18 to 24.

While 18 per cent of all age groups in the UK said they sometimes drank with the sole intention of getting drunk, that rose to 59 per cent among 18 to 24-year-olds and 43 per cent aged 25 to 34.

Researchers also found 27 per cent of people in the UK say they drink too much.

In the 18 to 24 age group, 29 per cent say they have forgotten what they have done after drinking.

More than a third - 39 per cent - admit they felt embarrassed about their behaviour when drinking.

The statistics were revealed as another study showed Britons are in third place in the European binge-drinking league.

Only Finland and Ireland have more binge-drinkers.

And those two countries and Britain are the only ones in the EU where girls out-booze the boys.

The average adult Briton goes on a bender every 13 days, according to the report, the first-ever EU-wide study on drinking.

More than a quarter of 15 to 16-year-olds said they went on at least three booze sessions in the last month.

The report brands alcohol "public health enemy No3" - behind only tobacco and high blood pressure.

It found the social cost of alcohol abuse had become as high as that for smoking, with booze responsible for more than seven per cent of disability and premature death in the EU.

The authors of the study found up to nine million children across Europe live in families damaged by alcohol.

And they blamed 10,000 "innocent" deaths each year on drink-driving.

The social cost of alcohol is thought to be around £446 a year per European house-hold - the same as tobacco.

Srabani Sen, head of Alcohol Concern, said yesterday: "This report paints a stark picture of the true impact of alcohol misuse across the EU.

"Far too many lives are lost to alcohol misuse and yet the evidence suggests that many of these deaths could be prevented if governments, including our own, took a few simple steps."

The report was written by the UK-based Institute of Alcohol Studies and funded by the European Commission.

The UK survey was conducted by Developing Patient Partnerships, a health education charity.

Dr Mary Church, joint chairman of the British Medical Association's Scottish general practitioners committee, said she was concerned at the results.

She said: "Alcohol has always played a part in Scottish social life and although most drink sensibly, bingeing and drinking just to get drunk is becoming a real health hazard for some Scots.

"Alcohol accounts for one in 30 of all deaths in Scotland and the cost to the NHS is estimated to be as much as £1.13 billion each year.

"If people are equipped with the knowledge of what dangerous drinking levels are, coupled with really practical advice about how to cut down and stay in control, it will go a long way to ensure that people enjoy a drink without overdoing it."

SNP deputy health spokesman Stewart Maxwell said: "We must look now at starting a national debate looking at what action can be taken to address this serious and growing problem.

"We need to examine not only our laws but also the advertising, availability and affordability of alcohol."

DPP are launching an Alcohol and You campaign to offer people practical advice on enjoying alcohol without overdoing it.

39% embarrassed by their drunk behaviour

59% drink with sole intention to get drunk

The Daily Record

Saturday, June 03, 2006

UK among worst 'binge drinkers'

UK adults and adolescents are among the worst binge drinkers in Europe, says an Institute of Alcohol Studies report.

The average rate of binge drinking in the UK is about once every 13 days - the third highest rate in Europe and four times higher than in Italy.

And over the last 10 years, binge drinking in UK girls has increased to the second highest level in Europe.

A second survey by health charity DPP showed a quarter of Britons drink with the sole intention of "getting drunk".

But the Institute of Alcohol Studies concluded there were effective ways to reduce the alcohol-related harm that costs Europe 125 billion Euros a year.


"Far too many lives are lost to alcohol misuse, and yet the evidence suggests that many of these deaths could be prevented if governments, including our own, took a few simple steps" Srabani Sen, Alcohol Concern

It recommended increased taxation and calculated that raising the price of alcohol in the EU would save over 9,000 deaths in the following year.

And warned that public education and voluntary partnerships with industry alone are very unlikely to reduce the burden of disease and death from alcohol misuse.

Strong Action

The researchers urged governments to take stronger action to intervene and regulate the alcohol market through measures such as price and availability.

The report found that alcohol is one of the worst public health problems in Europe after tobacco and high blood pressure, has a greater impact than obesity, lack of exercise or illicit drugs.

Five to nine million children were living in families damaged by alcohol and the 10,000 deaths that occur to bystanders or passengers from drink-drivers.

But although the figures show that UK citizens are among the worst binge drinkers in Europe, drinking levels per person (13 litres of pure alcohol per year) are just under the EU average of 15 litres of pure alcohol per year.

Research published by the health charity DPP: Developing Patient Partnerships found that 24% of Britons sometimes drink just to "get drunk".

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the figure is even higher in young people with 59% of 18-24 year olds and 43% of 25-34 year olds drinking to get drunk.

More than a quarter (27%) of working Brits have had times when they struggle to do their jobs because they are hungover, rising to 80% of 18-34 year olds.

Dr Anderson, lead author of the Institute of Alcohol Studies report and international public health expert, said: "What really makes the need for action so urgent is that we know what works in reducing this toll. What we now need is just to get on with it."

Professor Ian Gilmore, chairman of the Royal College of Physicians Alcohol Committee, said: "Clearly there are differences in the health impact of alcohol misuse across the member states in Europe, but important themes emerge that resonate with the problems facing the UK today.

"The college strongly supports the conclusion that governments have a responsibility to intervene, and that regulation of the alcohol market through price and availability, has the greater capability to reduce harm."

Srabani Sen, Alcohol Concern's chief executive, said: "Far too many lives are lost to alcohol misuse, and yet the evidence suggests that many of these deaths could be prevented if governments, including our own, took a few simple steps."

"We hope this report acts as a wake-up call to the European Union and to the governments of Europe.

"Alcohol misuse is one of the most widespread public health problems that we are facing, and yet across Europe far too little is being done to reduce the damage it causes and save lives."

Friday, June 02, 2006

One in six Britons ‘under the influence’ at work

One in six employees in Britain has been under the influence of alcohol at work in the last six months, a study into ‘Alcohol in the workplace’ by leading commercial insurer Royal & SunAlliance (R&SA) has revealed.

One in six employees in Britain has been under the influence of alcohol at work in the last six months, a study into ‘Alcohol in the workplace’ by leading commercial insurer Royal & SunAlliance (R&SA) has revealed. With 20 – 25 per cent of accidents in the workplace caused by alcohol, these statistics will be of concern to many employers.
Nearly 60,000 employers also attribute the effects of alcohol the next day, on up to ten per cent of absenteeism, and 54,000 blame up to ten per cent of workplace under-performance on alcohol.

The R&SA study was commissioned to examine the effects of the 24-hour drinking legislation on alcohol in the workplace after six months of the new licensing laws. The research showed that two million working Britons took one or more days off sick due to alcohol-induced illness over the last six months. Whilst both employers and employees did not think the problem has got worse since the introduction of 24-hour drinking in November, there is an ongoing cultural problem in Britain of people drinking alcohol during the working day.

The younger age groups are the worst culprits, with 12 per cent of under 30 year olds pulling a ‘sickie’ due to excess alcohol. According to the Health & Safety Executive between 8 to 14 million working days in the UK are lost due to alcohol-related absenteeism.

Phil Bell, technical manager – liability at Royal & SunAlliance, comments: ”Our study reveals that there is an ongoing problem with alcohol in the workplace, even though the 24-hour drinking legislation has not increased this further. Employers can be held liable for accidents in the workplace and research shows that 20 – 25 per cent of these are caused by alcohol.

“Employers need to put risk controls and policies in place to ensure that they are providing a safe working environment for their employees, particularly with the World Cup approaching. Encouragingly, 91 per cent of the companies we surveyed did have an alcohol policy, but this still leaves 14,000 employers at risk.”

North – South Divide
There is a real North - South divide in drinking during working hours, which contradicts some established stereotypes. London (26 per cent), Eastern England (26 per cent) and the South West (24 per cent) have the most employees admitting to drinking during the working day, whereas those working in the northern regions (both North East and North West) drink the least.

World Cup Headache
The World Cup will cause even more of a headache for employers as football fans head to the pubs and bars to watch the World Cup games. The R&SA study reveals that one in ten (2.9 million) working Britons will leave work early to watch the football and five per cent (1.4 million) will go to the pub to watch the games and then return to work. Two per cent of employees called in sick during the last World Cup due to a hangover after watching the games, and the expected increase in absenteeism in June and July could have a serious effect on the nation’s businesses.

To combat this, 20 per cent of companies are planning to show the England World Cup matches in the workplace, with 12 per cent arranging to show all of the games in the tournament. A small number of employers (four per cent) will even give staff the day off if England win the cup.

Phil Bell concluded, “The effects of alcohol can be extensive, from an increased number of accidents in the workplace or lateness due to hangovers, through to impaired decision making, and a poor image for customers or clients. This can have an impact on everyone, especially sober colleagues who end up carrying the strain.”

Royal & SunAlliance has provided the following tips for companies to tackle alcohol in the workplace, during the World Cup:

If possible, show the popular World Cup games in the workplace to avoid staff disappearing to the pub.

Managers should identify those employees that are football fans and talk to them about their plans – perhaps arrange for them to leave early if they make up the hours on another day.

Introduce an alcohol policy: this should include why the policy exists and who it applies to, who is responsible for carrying out the policy, the rules, details of disciplinary actions that will be taken and help that is available to employees.

Consultation is vital – any changes in company rules are made easier if staff feel they have been consulted beforehand.

Develop suitable training for managers and supervisors to help gain managers’ and employees’ support for the policy.

Companies should closely monitor whether there is a problem by looking at records on sickness absence, productivity, accident records and disciplinary procedures.

Business News

Thursday, June 01, 2006

Hungover teenagers skipping class

A number of teenagers in Cheshire have missed school in the last year because they had a hangover, a report says.

More than a third of 14 to 17-year-olds questioned in the county council survey admitted getting drunk and 35% said they suffered memory loss afterwards.

Of the 200 teenagers quizzed, several admitted missing school at least five times because they had drunk too much.

Cheshire County Council said concerns about alcohol and other issues raised by the research were being tackled.

The youngsters were questioned by the council as part of its third annual Quality of Life survey.

On alcohol, 37% of children said they had drunk enough to affect their well-being or safety, consuming enough to make them sick, dizzy or fall down.

Thirty-five per cent said they had been so drunk they had been unable to remember the things they did.

Despite the statistics, only 19% had been told by family or friends to cut down on their drinking.

Linda Brown, of the council's inclusion and school improvement service, said: "Sadly these figures, which broadly reflect the national position, come as little surprise.

'Horrendous problems'

"Our concern was translated into high priority action some time ago."

Mrs Brown said parents had a major role to play in educating children about the dangers of alcohol.

Forty six per cent of the teenagers surveyed reported drinking at home with their parents' knowledge.

"We need to accept that excess drinking causes horrendous problems - and start conveying that message in the home," Mrs Brown added.

BBC News