Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Closing time for an antiquated U.K. booze law

Hoping to cut binge drinking, some pubs allowed to keep doors open later

British boozefest
Nov. 28: New laws allow pubs in England to stay open around the clock to help curb binge drinking. But has the more lenient rule helped keep the peace among pub goers? NBC News London correspondent David Miller gives a report from across the pond.

'Tis the season to be jolly. However, in Britain, a dramatic increase in excessive drinking has called the government to rethink the law. The government wants to end what has happened all too often in the country -- heavy drinkers pouring into the streets at the traditional closing time of 11 p.m.

In the first major overhaul of alcohol serving laws in 80 years, pubs, restaurants and nightclubs no longer have to close at that time.

More than 70,000 drinking establishments have applied for the extended hours. And some have been granted licenses to stay open 24 hours a day. The argument is that later closing times will lead to more civilized drinking.

"I think it probably will, actually, because there won't be such a rush to get the drinks finished by 11," said Pub Manager Osin Rogers.

Alcohol abuse is costing Britain $3 billion a year. Binge drinking has become a national embarrassment with three in five men and one in five women consuming an unhealthy amount of alcohol.

Another problem is alcohol-fueled violence. After midnight, 70 percent of emergency room admissions are alcohol related. Police say last call in Britain is a problem no matter what the hour.

Said Jeremy Paine, a police superintendent and opponent of the new measure: "People will be spending more money on alcohol and drinking more to excess, then there will be more violence. There's no doubt about that."

In addition to the change in the law, the government is spending millions of dollars in an anti drinking campaign, but it's unlikely to influence how much people drink.

"We're going to see the same drinking patterns that we have now, but happening later into the night," predicts a spokesperson for a group called Alcohol Concern.

The change in the drinking law may alter forever how the British socialize. The government is hoping its citizens will be sober enough to enjoy it.

So far, the results have been positive. In Bournemouth, in Dorsett, where 51 different bars are licensed to serve round the clock, police said Friday night was quieter than usual. Same in London, in New Castle and Noddingham and Liverpool.

MSNBC ~ Nov. 29, 2005

Monday, November 28, 2005

More Crime, More Anti-social Behaviour, More Binge Drinking, More Deaths, More Murders & More Rapes

It sounds like the end of the world, doesn't it but what legislation will result in all the above concequences?

Christmas came early for thousands of drinkers last Thursday when new laws were implemented to allow pubs, clubs, bars, restaurants and supermarkets open for twenty-four hours.

In England and Wales, some 700 properties have been granted to open all day. 240 of those are pubs, nightclubs or bars and 250 supermarkets have chosen to remain open for twenty-four hours. A further 300 premises have applied to vary their licences by either extending their opening hours by an hour or two or by offering food and entertainment into the early hours.

So why have the Labour government authorized continuous drinking? According to my local MP: “what we have done is given more flexibility to the hours which individual pubs and clubs can open, more discretion to local authorities to take account of local situations and more powers to the police and local authorities to enforce high standards”.

When Labour was elected to serve a third term in 2005, a key pledge of theirs was to tackle anti-social behaviour on our streets. In June this year, the government announced that from October to December 2004, there was a 116% rise in anti-social behaviour orders handed out, compared to the same quarter in 2003. It is tremendously hypocritical then for this government to have gone ahead with twenty-four hour drinking laws. According to a spokesperson for the Department of Culture, the section in charge of the licensing changes: “graduated closing times will help to cut anti-social behaviour”. How anyone can say that allowing people to drink for longer will not see a rise in disruptive behaviour needs their head examining - is this government living in the real world? To confuse the situation even more, ministers admitted on Wednesday, 16 November that an increase in drink-fuelled violence and anti-social behaviour will follow the introduction of their laws. So, not only are the government sending out clashing messages, the people who run this country are becoming increasingly unreliable and devious.

Violent crime has increased by 6% in England and Wales, according to the Home Office. To add insult to injury, the government have persisted on opening pubs continuously. Even Charles Clark, the man in charge of affairs at home, admitted that crime was set to rise as a result of the law. The government, however, in keeping with the tradition of being deceitful, have said that two and a half million pounds worth of powers to crack down on alcohol fuelled chaos and crime will be implemented. Do they not realise, however, that if they hadn’t introduced twenty-four hour drinking in the first place, then they wouldn’t of had to of wasted over two million pounds to restrict the mayhem it will bring with it? As the Conservative’s Culture Secretary, Theresa May correctly said: “no matter how many panicked initiatives they announce, it will be the police and the public who will have to deal with the consequences of the governments mistakes”. Let’s just hope that the Labour MP’s who voted for this ludicrous legislation are not subject to crime brought on by alcohol.

Worryingly, according to research, up to a quarter of adults in Britain are binge drinkers. One in three men and one in five women drink at least double the recommended daily limit. Even more disturbingly, binge drinking among teenagers is excessively high and according to two of the UK’s top doctors, more teenagers will die from liver disease thanks to twenty-four hour drinking. Professor Gilmore, the chairman of the Royal College of Physician’s alcohol committee, said: “Worldwide research shows that levels of consumption are heavily increased by price and availability. An increase in hours of sale is likely to be associated with a rise rather than a fall in alcohol consumption.”

Doctor Moriarty, an advisor to the Department of Health on liver disease told the BBC: “Now we're seeing patients in their thirties and twenties and even the occasional patient in their teens will irreversible alcoholic liver disease and dying in their twenties with irreversible alcoholic liver disease - with jaundice and liver coma, internal bleeding - and it's very distressing”. Doctors have also warned of an increase in strokes among people who binge drink. How ironic that this government said a crack down on binge drinking was a priority in their eyes. According to government figures released in August, the number of children in the UK admitted to hospital due to alcohol consumption rose 11% since the mid-1990’s. In ten years time, however, that number will no doubt ascend thanks to the government of today.

The government are also being enormously contradictory. In October, they announced that drinking on public transport was to banned. As the Liberal Democrats said: “it is absurd to ban drinking on trains and buses while letting pubs open for twenty-four hours”. It is also bewildering how the government can lecture us on salt intake and even ban smoking in public places to improve our health but still retain all-day drinking. In case they didn’t know, alcohol is just as harmful as smoking. One gets the impression that Labour don’t actually know what they are doing and want an apocalyptic society.

Police and hospitals have also raised their concerns over the laws, but the government have constantly ignored their worries. More pressures on police forces across the country to control crime and anti-social behaviour on the streets as well as more strains on hospitals to treat injured drunks are feared due to the laws. Not only has Sir John Stevens, Britain’s top policeman warned of a binge-drinking ‘epidemic’ thanks to the laws, he also said that police forces will feel the strain. This view is also shared by shadow home secretary David Davis who said that Sir Johns concerns are reflected by ‘thousands’ of police officers and doctors up and down the country.

So, the implementation of twenty-four hour drinking is going to bear grim results. We may not have seen the full consequences yet but imagine what the situation will be like if the legislation is kept for several years. More crime, more anti-social behaviour, more binge drinking, more deaths, more murders, more rapes, more STD’s and more pressure on hospitals and police forces are just a few costs of twenty-four hour drinking. Anyone would of thought the government would have voted for these laws. Oh, I forgot. They did.

Exzibit ~ 26/11/2005.

Sunday, November 27, 2005

Alcohol: Liver's worst enemy

That alcohol is a deadly potion was brought home in a very uncomfortable manner when it was announced that George Best, arguably one of the greatest footballers' died in London yesterday.

Best had had a liver transplant in 2002 after his own liver failed in the aftermath of his boozing exploits. But this is just one case. Millions of people the world over, mostly male, suffer from alcohol-related liver disease each year. It is estimated that liver disease, cancer and alcohol poisoning account for thousands of death each year. The World Health Organization (WHO) says that it is the third biggest killer after tobacco and hypertension that is high blood pressure. 'Alcohol is a major risk to public health. Smoking causes more deaths, but the number of smokers is on the decrease,' said Colin Drummond, professor of addiction psychiatry at St George's Hospital Medical School in south London. 'Drug taking only kills a few hundred in comparison, yet the government spends more on tackling that. Drinking, by comparison, is on the rise and too little is being done to help.'

A recent report had said that the UK was one of Europe's worst offenders' with alcohol consumption rising by 15 percent over the last five years. It remains the single biggest cause of liver disease and is responsible for more than 75 percent of hospital admissions due to the same. Excess alcohol consumption leads to fatty liver then to cirrhosis of the liver and then liver failure. It also remains the major culprit in the causation of liver cancer. However, a limited quantity of alcohol is beneficial in heart disease, strokes, breast cancer, mouth and stomach cancers and osteoporosis. 'Too many people think their drinking is not a problem, but you do not need to be dependent on alcohol for it to cause short and long-term problems,' said a spokeswoman for the charity alcohol concern.

Medindia on Liver disease: The ill effects of alcohol consumption is not taken seriously because the enjoyment of alcohol is socially accepted and even encouraged in many cultures.

Medindia ~ 26 Nov 2005

Doctors will get right not to treat self-inflicted illnesses

Doctors are to be issued with new guidance permitting them to refuse to treat a patient if they judge that an illness is self-inflicted.

The guidelines will be introduced as a poll shows that one in five doctors admits that he or she has already denied patients treatment because they drink heavily, smoke or are obese.

This weekend Sir Michael Rawlins, chairman of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (Nice) said the guidelines would ensure that the limited National Health Service budget was well spent.

He singled out alcoholics by saying the institute’s new social value judgments will make it clear that if patients continue to drink they will not be given a liver transplant.

“Alcoholism rots the liver and if the patient is going to continue drinking, giving them a liver when there is already a shortage of organs is not a sensible use of resources,” Rawlins said.

“We are not punishing alcoholics, it is just that it is pointless spending all that money and using a liver that could be used for someone else.”

The poll of more than 400 doctors for the medical website Doctors.net.uk found that 19% of respondents had withheld treatment because of a patient’s unhealthy lifestyle.

Dr Julian Randall, a GP in Dudley, in the West Midlands,said he had denied treatment to a smoker: “Vascular surgery on a patient who still smokes is almost certainly doomed to fail. Unless the limb needs to be saved immediately, I refuse to refer them until satisfied that their condition is no better after six months of not smoking.”

Randall added: “In Dudley we lost a vascular surgeon, which has increased the waiting list. The remaining surgeons will need to prioritise the patients they operate on. We delay operating on those who are still smoking to take pressure off.

“I tell patients, ‘It is the wicked weed that has caused this. You will develop gangrene unless you stop’. My end of the bargain is to refer them to smoking cessation clinics.”

The Nice guidelines state that care cannot be denied simply on the grounds that a condition is self-inflicted. However, according to a draft of the code to be debated next week, the treatment can be withheld if the patient’s lifestyle affects the success or cost effectiveness of the operation.

Last week primary care trusts in east Suffolk ruled that obese patients will no longer be given hip and knee replacements on the NHS. GPs and consultants agreed not to refer anyone with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 30 to a specialist until they lose weight.

Brian Keeble, director of public health for Ipswich Primary Care Trust, said the new Nice guidance is in line with the approach taken in east Suffolk. “This decision was driven by the consultants who carry out the operations that fail. There was a feeling that we were not using resources wisely as these hips needed to be redone,” he said.

“If the condition is not life-threatening, we need our patients to get their weight down before the operation.This may also apply to other specialities. Doctors up and down the country are beginning to look at this.”

The Sunday Times ~ November 27, 2005

Sober lessons about drink

Roger Williams, Best's doctor, says his death should make us consider our drinking culture

Drinking is a public health menace in the UK, inflicting a wide range of medical and social harms. There are deaths from cirrhosis of the liver, damage to the pancreas, degeneration of the brain and infertility - it affects pretty much every bodily system.

People drink and choke to death on vomit - it's hideous. Many road accidents are caused by people's blood alcohol level being too high; there is violence in the streets; and people have accidents because they've been drinking heavily - 25 per cent of all hospital emergency admissions are drink-related. And there's all those working days lost through drink-related absenteeism.

There is such a long list of adverse consequences of our drinking culture that I have no idea why on earth the government has liberalised our licensing laws. Most doctors and scientific experts, and many police officers, warned against any extension of opening hours.

During my 46 years working in liver research we have seen exciting breakthroughs in transplantation, treating hepatitis and the ability to reverse alcoholic damage to the liver using drugs. Yet just when we should be seeing fewer cases of liver disease, people's lifestyles mean we're seeing more.

I fear that extending licensing hours will lead to an increase in all the detrimental effects of alcoholism. Young people's habit of drinking to excess is a particular concern - these people are the chronic alcoholics of the future. Opening hours should be tighter not slacker. People will say that's limiting personal liberty but the freedom to drink has to be balanced with the many harms alcohol does.

Scandinavia got its drinking under control by putting up the price. A gin and tonic in a bar in Sweden costs about £20, so people there don't drink so much. We should be going down that road in Britain.

There should be notices on alcohol bottles and cans telling you how many units you're having, reminders about safe drinking levels and warnings that if you go above them you may damage your health.

I'd like to see more government resources going into education, prevention and treatment and strategies like the appointment of alcohol support nurses, better treatment facilities and greater funding for voluntary organisations which help drinkers.

Ministers have announced initiatives for cancer and heart disease but not for drinking problems. Heavy drinking is thought to be self-induced, so resources aren't going into it.

I hope that George Best's demise will lead to more attention being given to alcoholism. He was a much-loved figure and I hope the country will respond to his death by looking at why people drink excessively.

Professor Roger Williams treated George Best from 2000 and supervised his care around his liver transplant in 2002. He is the director of the Foundation for Liver Research.

The Observer ~ Sunday November 27, 2005

Saturday, November 26, 2005

Bestie: Football's Original Superstar

It was two o'clock in the afternoon just off Fenchurch Street in the heart of the City of London and George Best was once more attracting a crowd.

Half a dozen pints of foaming Guinness were lined up in front of him like soccer players singing the national anthem. As many shots of vodka completed a formation with which Best was entirely familiar.

Another Best booze-up? Another one of those days which so often turned into a fortnight of fierce drinking, the memory of which would never be more than an alcoholic blur?

No, as it happens, this was a day when Best touched not a drop.

A day he turned up on time and perfectly sober for a signing session on a book celebrating Manchester United's first Championship title for 26 years.

It took only a glance at the queue which stretched like a coiled python more than 100 yards outside the bookshop to recognise the enduring nature of Best's appeal - an appeal which makes his death at the age of 59 so hard to bear.

So why the booze?

Simply that every 10th person or so who filtered past for more than two hours felt compelled to go into the adjacent pub and return with a drink and words to the effect of "Thanks for the great memories, George."

He didn't want a drink, all he asked for that day was a cup of tea but the story simply demonstrates how Best had become a prisoner of his own image - the one which decreed that he and booze were inseparable.

Still, 'Thanks for the Memories' is not a bad inscription for the tombstone of a footballer Pele once described as "the greatest player in the world" - even if it doesn't begin to tell the inspiring and equally demoralising story of certainly the most gifted, bravest and enigmatic player the British Isles have ever produced.

At lunch that May day 12 years ago Best was in fine form - charming, cheerful and philosophical in the glare of the prodigious fame he found increasingly difficult to handle.

He told of the senseless morons who, merely because of his fame or his association with Manchester United, would take a swing at him in countless bars, out shopping or even once as he queued at a local chip shop.

He told of the health clubs, the clinics, the Alcoholics Anonymous meetings he had attended. "I might have gone to Alcoholics Anonymous but I found it pretty hard to be anonymous," he joked.

He admitted he had tested the implants he had sewn into his stomach to see how many drinks he could have before he was sick.

He acknowledged the help he had received in more than 30 years of self-abuse. But equally he accepted that he would never be rid of the drinking curse.

The drink wrecked his career, devastated his features, put him in jail on a drink-driving charge, ruined his first marriage to Angie and his second to former airline hostess Alex and prevented him from forming a close bond which he always craved with his son Calum.

It saw him wreck his own liver and then abuse someone else's after a transplant gave him renewed hope of a normal life in his later years.

In the end the alcohol which was such an integral and vibrant part of his youthful dalliances in Manchester all those years ago became his poison - slowly corroding the body and eventually his mind.

In the end, for all that the final infection was not alcohol related, the drink killed him, the suppressants he took to safeguard his transplant having ravaged his immune system.

It is one of sport's modern tragedies but the one person you would never have found voicing regrets or pining over lost opportunities was Best himself.

As a player he showed the bravery of a lion in the face of the most intimidating defenders - as a man self-pity was not part of his make-up.

He never dived, never feigned injury, never tried to get a fellow professional into trouble.

Equally he blamed no-one for the excesses for which he was famed - not his family, nor his working class background in Belfast where he was the only contemporary from his community to pass the 11-plus.

Perhaps his most endearing characteristic was recognising he was the architect of his own downfall, though it should be said there was no end to the hangers-on and opportunists ready to make a buck at his expense, just as there was no end to the women inclined to spend the night in his company.

That he indulged so many of each was a tribute to his stamina as well as his kindness and generosity.

The greatest sadness of all, perhaps, is that Best will be remembered as much, maybe even more, for the blondes and the booze as the football.

But what football.

From those first innocent days in the Sixties, when he stayed in Mrs Fullaway's digs with David Sadler, Best displayed the poise, balance and control of a genius.

"He had ice in his veins, warmth in his heart and timing and balance in his feet," Danny Blanchflower once remarked.

The former Tottenham legend left out the fact that he also possessed a thunderous shot in either foot, was good in the air and was a fearless tackler.

For all the stories of him not turning up for matches and jetting off to Marbella, he was also renowned as the most dedicated trainer in the club.

The goals, meanwhile, are seared into the memory - that jinking, slanting run from the halfway line against Sheffield United, driven wide by defenders but still able to unleash an unstoppable shot from an acute angle.

That exercise in composure and control on a mudbound pitch against Chelsea when again he left defenders in his wake before dummying the goalkeeper to all but walk the ball into the net.

Those six in the FA Cup against Northampton and the night he turned from being merely a star into 'El Beatle' as the Portuguese newspapers were to name him after he had scored two goals in the Stadium of Light as United beat Benfica 5-1 in the third round of the European Cup in 1966 - a victory which propelled him to the front as well as the back pages.

Precise lobs, deft back heels, thunderous volleys - they were all part of the Best portfolio.

But perhaps most of all on the pitch he will be remembered for the solo goal in extra-time which killed off Benfica in the 1968 European Cup final at Wembley and brought the most prestigious prize in club football to England for the first time.

Back in 1993 I asked him to write a foreword for a souvenir publication about United.

What he remembered about that goal? What he recalled most about that heady night at Wembley and the team which Sir Matt Busby had built following the flames of Munich?

"It was a long time ago, I can't really remember that much," he said wearily. "You write it and I'll sign it."

The ocean of drink had blurred the memory, the zest for life was on the wane, though the mind was still sharp as anyone who witnessed him polish off the cryptic crosswords in the national papers would testify.

Unfortunately, for all his attempts at a cure - the patches, the pills, the clinics, the implants, the transplant - Best just couldn't give up drinking.

In his heart of hearts he probably never wanted to despite the endless promises, usually after another broken engagement or public embarrassment.

But he never did, even when his liver was wrecked. Even after the gift of a dead man's healthy organ.

He hated himself for that.

His second marriage faltered in acrimony and violence, Best sporting black eyes proving he took as good as he got.

He took to living at a friend's health farm and must have been the only resident to polish off a bottle of white wine before breakfast.

In truth, he became a tragic caricature, a man whose reckless living, or chronic illness depending on your point of view, tested the sympathy of the British public.

And all of us who knew and loved him, however fleetingly, were filled with dread.

Now those fears have become cold reality. As the news came through, however, I remembered the words of Sir Matt Busby when asked in later years of the sleepless nights Best had caused.

"We had our problems with the wee fella," admitted Sir Matt. "But I prefer to remember his genius." So should we all.

Thanks for the memories George.

By Frank Malley, PA Chief Sports Writer ~ Sporting Life ~ 26/11/05

Friday, November 25, 2005

Best hoped the publicity surrounding his plight would act as a warning to others

Once a pin-up boy for his generation, the last, harrowing photographs of George Best graphically show the extent to which decades of alcohol abuse ravaged his body.

Taken at the end of last week, just hours before he was admitted to intensive care, Best's skin is yellowing and his body is covered in tubes. He authorised the pictures himself, telling his agent: "I hope my plight can act as a warning to others."

It was not his transplanted liver that finally gave up on him, but his lungs and kidneys that became fatally infected. His body weakened by his continued drinking and his immune system compromised by the anti-rejection drugs that he had taken since his transplant in 2002, his vital organs could not withstand the onslaught of a flu-like infection that other people would have shrugged off.

Best's drinking problem was affecting his health by the time he was 25, when he admitted he was drinking a bottle of spirits a day.

As his footballing career began to decline, his drinking increased and so did his girth. By the 1980s, he was living in America and already in a cycle of drinking and treatment that characterised his life.

He recalled: "I was in fights. I was in and out of hospital for treatment. I tried having implants. I went to prison. It was all related to booze and really I wasn't going anywhere."

He was one of the first people to have pellets sewn into the lining of his stomach that were supposed to make him violently sick if he drank alcohol. But two separate attempts at the implant treatment, in Scandinavia and the US, failed to stop him drinking.

He went to Alcoholics Anonymous meetings but said they made him "edgy", while rehabilitation clinics also failed.

By the mid-1980s, a bookmaker Best knew offered him odds of 6-4 on making it to his 40th birthday.

In 2000, he collapsed and was rushed to hospital. It was then that he became a patient of the renowned liver specialist Professor Roger Williams, who told him that one more drink would kill him. Best did stop, but the damage was done. A strict diet and drug regime failed to stop his condition deteriorating, and Professor Williams decided the only option was a transplant.

Best endured an eight-month wait before a suitable organ was found. The transplant was performed in July 2002 at the private Cromwell Hospital in London. Best almost died during the 10-hour operation and lost 40 pints of blood. He needed two further operations in the days after the transplant, but battled through infections and setbacks. Then depression - a common condition following a transplant - set in and Best began drinking once more. He had been warned that the immunosuppressant drugs he had to take every day would leave him vulnerable to infection.

It became clear later that his kidney function could not be improved with dialysis and his damaged lungs made breathing so hard that he was put on a ventilator.

Best had suffered internal bleeding related to a bowel infection at the end of October, and the problem returned. The weeks in intensive care had weakened his body and this time, his medical team could not stem the bleeding, as his organs began to shut down.

With the failure of his lungs, kidneys and liver, even George Best's legendary ability to beat the odds was coming to an end.

Once a pin-up boy for his generation, the last, harrowing photographs of George Best graphically show the extent to which decades of alcohol abuse ravaged his body.

Taken at the end of last week, just hours before he was admitted to intensive care, Best's skin is yellowing and his body is covered in tubes. He authorised the pictures himself, telling his agent: "I hope my plight can act as a warning to others."

It was not his transplanted liver that finally gave up on him, but his lungs and kidneys that became fatally infected. His body weakened by his continued drinking and his immune system compromised by the anti-rejection drugs that he had taken since his transplant in 2002, his vital organs could not withstand the onslaught of a flu-like infection that other people would have shrugged off.

Best's drinking problem was affecting his health by the time he was 25, when he admitted he was drinking a bottle of spirits a day.

As his footballing career began to decline, his drinking increased and so did his girth. By the 1980s, he was living in America and already in a cycle of drinking and treatment that characterised his life.

He recalled: "I was in fights. I was in and out of hospital for treatment. I tried having implants. I went to prison. It was all related to booze and really I wasn't going anywhere."

He was one of the first people to have pellets sewn into the lining of his stomach that were supposed to make him violently sick if he drank alcohol. But two separate attempts at the implant treatment, in Scandinavia and the US, failed to stop him drinking.

He went to Alcoholics Anonymous meetings but said they made him "edgy", while rehabilitation clinics also failed.

By the mid-1980s, a bookmaker Best knew offered him odds of 6-4 on making it to his 40th birthday.

In 2000, he collapsed and was rushed to hospital. It was then that he became a patient of the renowned liver specialist Professor Roger Williams, who told him that one more drink would kill him. Best did stop, but the damage was done. A strict diet and drug regime failed to stop his condition deteriorating, and Professor Williams decided the only option was a transplant.

Best endured an eight-month wait before a suitable organ was found. The transplant was performed in July 2002 at the private Cromwell Hospital in London. Best almost died during the 10-hour operation and lost 40 pints of blood. He needed two further operations in the days after the transplant, but battled through infections and setbacks. Then depression - a common condition following a transplant - set in and Best began drinking once more. He had been warned that the immunosuppressant drugs he had to take every day would leave him vulnerable to infection.

It became clear later that his kidney function could not be improved with dialysis and his damaged lungs made breathing so hard that he was put on a ventilator.

Best had suffered internal bleeding related to a bowel infection at the end of October, and the problem returned. The weeks in intensive care had weakened his body and this time, his medical team could not stem the bleeding, as his organs began to shut down.

With the failure of his lungs, kidneys and liver, even George Best's legendary ability to beat the odds was coming to an end.

The Independent ~ 25 November 2005

Thursday, November 24, 2005

Safety warning to drunk pedestrians

Almost half of all pedestrians killed in road crashes between 10pm and 4am on Fridays and Saturdays are more than twice over the drink-drive alcohol limit, it has been revealed.

The Government figures, published by the RAC Foundation, come out on the day that new late-night licensing laws are introduced.

Of pedestrians in the 25-29 age group who died in road accidents last year and who were known to have alcohol in their blood, two-thirds were over the drink-drive limit and almost half were twice over the limit.

In 2004, a total of 301 killed pedestrians were found to have blood alcohol concentration. Of these, 38% were over the drink-drive limit and 25% more than twice over the limit.

The foundation also expressed its concern that total alcohol-related deaths on the roads are on the increase. Provisional estimates for last year suggest that 590 people were killed, compared with 580 drink-drive-related deaths in 2003.

In response, the RAC Foundation is calling for more traffic police to target drink drivers and better road safety awareness for drinking pedestrians.

Kevin Delaney, head of road safety at the RAC Foundation, said: "Most of us are well aware of the problems of drink driving, but little is said about the perils of drunk pedestrians.

"It is worrying to see the rising numbers of young pedestrians killed after drinking and the rises in fatalities who had consumed excessive amounts of alcohol. Heavy intoxication must be a contributory factor in pedestrian accidents.

"Many of those pedestrians killed had made a sensible, laudable and informed choice not to take a car while they were drinking and were acting within the law. But drunken pedestrians leave themselves open to injury or death because their condition means that they are not in a fit state to consider the road safety dangers.

"New methods will need to be employed to highlight the potential dangers to drunken pedestrians. People going out drinking need to think carefully about how they will get home."

Daily Mail ~ 24/11/05

'Addicts best placed to deliver message'

Education is the key to preventing under-age drinking, claims one former alcoholic who first hit the bottle aged 15.

Jon, of Bewbush, represents addicts at Crawley's Drug Advice Centre, Addaction.

He spoke out as staff from Addaction spoke to magistrates from the town about their programme for alcoholics and drug addicts last week.

Jon explained: "I am not surprised alcohol is such a big problem for youngsters. I think it is more of an issue than drugs. You've only got to look at A&E on a Friday night. There are not many drug addicts in there.

"The youngsters need education from someone who has been through the system and say 'I was like you at 15'.

"It's human nature to try things, but if people are aware where it can lead they would be more careful.

"When you are 15 it's all a bit of a laugh. You are in a rush to grow up."

Jon, 38, hit his lowest point when he blacked out and woke up in his own vomit having soiled himself.

"I didn't know where I was. I used to drink half a bottle of Bacardi and 12 cans of Grolsh. You can't sustain that for long.

"I was told by an Outreach worker that if I carried on I would not be alive in a year."

Addaction operates two free services in Crawley, needle exchange and a day programme run by experienced trained sub-stance misuse workers in confidence. There are interpreters for all sections of the community.

ic SurreyOnline ~ Nov 23 2005

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

24-hr ‘alcoholic Big Bang’ stirs debate in UK

London: The time-honoured tradition of the “last orders” call urging revellers to down their last drink by the 11 p.m. deadline will vanish from British pubs this week.

The uniquely British way of calling time on a good night out had over the years incurred the wrath of many and seemed quaintly out of step with the lifestyle of an otherwise modern nation.

Licensing laws had not changed since 1915, when hours were tightened to stop factory workers from turning up drunk and thus harming the war effort during World War One.

It is hardly surprising therefore that the revolutionary changes brought in by the Labour government to allow “24-hour drinking” have unleashed a soul-searching debate about the nation’s drinking habits.

While the government maintains that the relaxation in opening hours which goes into effect November 24 will “promote responsible drinking”, critics predict an “alcoholic Big Bang” that will signal an explosion of drink-induced chaos and disorder in the streets.

The new licensing laws, which also apply to bars and supermarkets, give pubs greater flexibility about when they can shut their doors. Most of the 90,000 pubs in England and Wales have applied to stay open for an extra one or two hours at weekends, rather than opening round the clock, government figures show.

The key question in the debate is whether the habit of binge drinking, particularly widespread among young people and women, will be fuelled or curbed by the extended hours.

Critics, including the police, researchers and sociologists, fear that anti-social behaviour, with its disturbing consequences of drinkers vomiting or brawling in the night-time streets, will be encouraged by the longer hours.

Researchers at the University of the West of England concluded that reforms to relax licensing laws in Australia, Iceland and Ireland had increased disorder.

But the government, promising a harsh police clampdown, believes that later and more flexible closing could eventually reduce consumption by stopping people rushing to finish their drinks, and avoid drinkers spilling on to the streets all at the same time. Ministers point to more liberal laws in parts of Europe as evidence of how late hours can encourage people not to binge.

“It is fanciful to think we can turn ourselves into a French-style wine tippling culture merely by abolishing licensing regulations,” said Professor Ian Gilmore from the Royal College of Physicians, a chief critic of the government’s plans.
According to the Institute of Alcohol Studies, British alcohol consumption per capita ranked 9th among selected countries, behind France, but ahead of Australia and the US.

However, Britons drink twice as much today as they did in the 1950 and if trends continue they will overtake the French in about two years.

The exact impact of alcohol abuse is hard to measure, but a 2003 report put the figure at £20 billion a year, including the health service, policing and the economy.

It is, however, the statistical fact that British teenagers are among the biggest boozers in Europe. This worries researchers and social workers.

The government hopes that the greater freedom and flexibility of time for revellers will have an “educational effect” and encourage “social drinking”.

British Home Secretary Charles Clarke conceded that drinking habits could not be changed overnight: “It will be a long journey but we must take a first step.”

Daily News & Analysis ~ November 22, 2005

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Alcoholics to get addiction drug

A drug used to treat heroin addicts will be available to alcoholics

Alcoholics in the UK are to get access to a controversial drug treatment programme which aims to help them "unlearn" drinking habits.

The programme, developed over 25 years by US doctor David Sinclair, includes the drug naltrexone and one-to-one outpatient therapy.

Naltrexone is thought to block the pleasurable effects of drinking alcohol.

Dr Sinclair believes that, by taking the drug and continuing to drink, alcoholics will slowly unlearn their drinking habits.

He claims a success rate of 78% for his treatment programme, which has been tested in Finland and the USA, takes up to five months and costs at least £1,500.

But alcohol experts in the UK are sceptical, saying that Dr Sinclair's treatment needs more research.

They are also worried that naltrexone does not address other aspects of alcoholism, such as the reason why a person turns to drink in the first place.

The programme, which is launched in the UK on Tuesday, is only available from selected clinics run by the organisation ContrAl.

It is already being prescribed at ContrAl clinics in Cardiff and Bristol.

Two more clinics are due to open in London in the next few weeks.

The treatment will only be available on a named patient basis.

This is because naltrexone, marketed under a variety of brand names, is not licensed as a treatment for alcoholics in the UK, although it is available in at least 28 other countries.

It is, however, licensed for the treatment of opiate addicts.

And it is also being investigated for use against other addictions, such as binge eating.

Motivation

The drug works by blocking receptors in the brain that cause effects such as euphoria.

Experts say it has a low success rate for heroin users, mainly because people start using again as soon as they stop taking it.

They believe it is generally effective only in people who are strongly motivated to get off drugs.

Alcohol Concern says it is not against naltrexone being used by alcoholics, but it fears people will see it as a "miracle cure".

And it is worried that the ContAl approach allows people to continue drinking.

"It has to be used as part of an overall treatment programme, which would include detoxification and counselling," said a spokeswoman.

She added that it could suppress cravings for alcohol, but did not tackle other issues related to problem drinking, such as the reason a person drank.

The British Medical Association says alcohol abuse is a much more pervasive than drug addiction, but is not taken as seriously.

It estimates that 8% of UK men and 4% of women are problem drinkers.

This means they drink over recommended levels which are three to four units a day for men and two to three units a day for women

A unit is said to be equivalent to half a pint of standard-strength beer, one measure of spirits or one glass of wine.

The government is currently devising a national alcohol strategy, which is expected to be published next year.

BBC News ~ Tuesday, September 21

U.K. to relax drinking laws

More than nine decades after Britain curtailed pub hours to get wartime munitions workers back to their jobs, round-the-clock public boozing is about to become a fact of 21st-century life.

Hundreds of pubs, clubs, hotels and inns across England and Wales have been granted licenses to serve alcohol for up to 24 hours a day beginning Thursday.

Paradoxically, Prime Minister Tony Blair's government is promoting the change as a solution to "binge drinking," a national problem that leads to city streets and town lanes being awash in vomit and urine nightly from alcoholic overindulgence.

Mr. Blair and his ministers hope the relaxation of the drinking laws will lead to a European-style cafe culture in which patrons linger for hours over a bottle of wine as in Paris or Rome, or a couple of steins of beer as they do in Berlin.

But police, judges, doctors and other critics fear they will, instead, get a quantum leap in the binge drinking that -- along with loutish behavior, street fighting and related crimes -- already plagues the land.

Even Mr. Blair's culture secretary, Tessa Jowell, who helped spearhead the changes in the licensing laws through Parliament, concedes that, "Yes, you may see a rise in violent alcohol-related crime."

Her ministerial colleague, Home Secretary Charles Clarke, suggested that, far from leisurely sipping glasses of Beaujolais around an outdoor table late in the evening, Britons may take years to overcome their penchant for binge drinking.

The British love affair with beer and bottled spirits is anchored deep in history, and it became a matter of national security during World War I, when Prime Minister David Lloyd George found himself faced with the problem of munitions workers lingering in bars instead of turning out bullets and bombs for the war effort.

Britain, the exasperated prime minister said, was "fighting Germans, Austrians and Drink -- and as far as I can see, the greatest of these foes is Drink."

Resulting legislation reduced the strength of beer, banned the buying of rounds in public houses and sharply restricted pub hours -- laws that remained on the books until the dying days of the 20th century.

The relaxed licensing that comes into effect Thursday amounts to the biggest overhaul in legalized drinking in Britain since those dark days of World War I.

Barely a month ago, Licensing Minister James Purnell insisted that "little evidence exists of more than a handful of bars and clubs applying for 24-hour licensing." But the "handful" has grown rapidly, to more than 700 and is climbing.

In addition, thousands of other pubs, hotels and inns have been granted permission to extend their hours by an hour or two beyond the traditional 11 p.m. closing time.

"What is clear," said Member of Parliament Theresa May, the opposition Conservative Party's culture spokeswoman, "is that the government is heading blindly into a dangerous world of 24-hour drinking. There is clearly chaos."

The Blair government also has begun a $4.35 million campaign to try to combat drunken behavior -- including a poster campaign threatening drinkers with $140 on-the-spot fines if they misbehave.

But police are not convinced such measures will be effective. Glyn Smith, chairman of the Metropolitan Police Federation, told journalists "extended hours are going to make life exceedingly more difficult" for the nation's police officers.

The Blair government remains adamant. Changing Britain's drinking habits "will take a long time," Mr. Clarke said, "but we have got to take that first step. It's a long journey, but that is what we are doing."

That argument doesn't wash with Nottinghamshire police Chief Constable Steve Green. "If we want a continental cafe culture," he said, "build cafes. If we want 24 hours of hell, let's keep on the way we are going."

The Washington Times ~ November 21, 2005

Sunday, November 20, 2005

Forks teen who caused fatal DUI crash slated for January release

Now 18, he admitted to drinking in 2003, then driving.

Daniel Scheetz, who at age 16 crashed a car while driving drunk, killing his friend Sean Cameron, will be released from detention in January.

Northampton County juvenile probation officials said Scheetz, 18, of Susan Circle, Forks Township, has done well during his stay at the Juvenile Detention Center in Easton. He was in court Friday for a review hearing before Judge Stephen G. Baratta.

Scheetz was ordered to the facility for two years beginning Jan. 12, 2004. His release date was not announced, but his attorney, Philip D. Lauer of Easton, said Scheetz should be home in early January.

Scheetz admitted in 2004 he had been drinking July 2, 2003, when he wrecked on Lower Mud Run Road in Lower Mount Bethel Township, crashing into a large tree. He was adjudicated delinquent — the equivalent of being found guilty in adult court — on one count each of homicide by vehicle, involuntary manslaughter and drunken driving, two counts of aggravated assault by vehicle while driving drunk, three counts of accidents involving death or injury while not properly licensed and several summary traffic offenses.

Scheetz and two other teenage passengers, Brian Kavcak and Antonio Cooper, both of Forks Township, were hurt in the accident. Scheetz was the only one who had been drinking.

Robert Cameron, Sean's father, told Scheetz on Friday that he and his wife were ''very happy'' about Scheetz's progress. In a soft voice, Cameron told Scheetz to be careful in selecting friends to ensure he stays out of trouble.

''Thank you for doing good work,'' he said.

Scheetz nodded.

Jennifer Starks, assistant director of treatment at the detention center, said Scheetz is a ''positive role model for other boys'' at the center. He graduated from high school in June and is taking classes at Northampton Community College.

She added that although Scheetz ''believes in the 12-step philosophy'' of Alcoholics Anonymous, he ''believes he can control by himself when he can and cannot drink in the future.''

Starks said that when Scheetz is released, he will be required to attend regular meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous. She did not say that Scheetz has been diagnosed as an alcoholic.

Starks said Scheetz has been a guest speaker for the ''Every 15 Minutes'' program, designed to teach young people the hazards of drinking and driving. In addition he is slated to be keynote speaker Dec. 1 at a drunken driving program at Lehigh University.

Scheetz will be paid a stipend of at least $300 for the Lehigh speech and the proceeds will go to a charity of the Cameron family's choice.

Jerry Glessner, Scheetz's probation officer, said that in preparation of his release, Scheetz will be allowed several home visits, with the first scheduled for Thanksgiving Day.

Scheetz will be placed on ''intensive probation'' when he is released, Glessner said, adding that conditions will include a curfew and visits by juvenile officers at least three times a week. The probation will continue, Glessner said, for as long as deemed necessary or until Scheetz turns 21. A judge will review Scheetz's progress every six months.

Baratta said he had been told Scheetz was doing well in his college classes.

The Morning Call ~ By Tyra Braden

Saturday, November 19, 2005

Industry sets out new drinks code

The biggest names in the drinks industry yesterday unveiled a new code of conduct designed to curb Britain's chronic problems with alcohol. Landlords are being issued with a new code of conduct to tackle Britain's alcohol problems.

They claimed the guidelines would ensure that landlords promote a "sensible drinking message" that will reduce dramatically the alcohol-fuelled violence that is the scourge of town and city centres at the weekend.

But a leading alcohol charity last night poured scorn on the new code and said it lacked "teeth" as it did not carry the threat of harsh penalties for businesses that failed to comply. Alcohol Concern's chief executive, Srabani Sen, said: "The guidance needs to have teeth. It needs to have sanctions for not complying. It is very important that the industry themselves act to clamp down on bad practices."

The drinks industry code launched in Manchester yesterday was developed in association with the government. It sets out measures to ensure that alcohol is advertised, marketed and sold responsibly.

In its eight guiding principles, the code reminds the drinks industry that it must not promote its produce to under-18s, make claims that alcohol can improve someone's social, sexual or physical performance and it must actively discourage people from illegal activities, including drink driving.

So far 16 industry bodies from across the UK, including the Scotch Whisky Association, representing pubs, bars, shops and restaurants have signed up.

The launch of an industry code of conduct comes in the wake of farcical scenes in the Scottish Parliament as MSPs plunged Scotland's licensing laws into confusion.

Despite a pledge to redraw the law to combat binge drinking and alcohol- fuelled violence, the politicians ultimately voted for 24-hour pub opening while restricting by two hours in the morning the times alcohol can be sold in shops.

Campaigners reacted with dismay, claiming that three years of consultation and debate had been ignored as MSPs had ultimately voted against the majority views of the drinks industry.

Paul Goggins, a Home Office minister, said: "The industry has a clear responsibility to ensure that bars, off-licenses, supermarkets and clubs are run in a way that promotes good practice." He warned that legal action might be taken against businesses that flouted the guidelines, although no specific charge has been created to punish a breach of the code.

Alcohol Concern yesterday published its own charter for the drinks industry to stop alcohol misuse. And it called on pub owners to police themselves more strictly after Holyrood's changes to the licensing laws.

The charity said that it wanted licensees to crack down on alcohol sales to drunk or underage customers.

It also urged landlords to rule among themselves to stop "irresponsible" drinks promotions, which have been blamed for binge drinking.

A spokesman for the British Beer and Pub Association, which co-ordinated the development of the new code, said the industry was "determined to promote the highest possible standards".

He added: "We recognise that we have a role to play in addressing alcohol misuse, and this shows our commitment to working with the government to tackle these problems."

19-Nov-05 ~ Scotsman.com

Friday, November 18, 2005

Half-empty or half-full?

As 24-hour drinking in pubs looms, stories about Britons' excessive alcohol consumption abound. But what's the truth about how much we drink?

All eyes will be on English and Welsh town centres next Thursday when later opening hours come into force.

Some have warned this moment, tagged an "alcoholic Big Bang", will signal chaos and disorder on the streets. Yet others are saying the impact will be far less dramatic, even negligible. Only time will reveal how our drinking habits may change, but what can we say about them now?

IS ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION INCREASING?

Yes, there has been a long-term increase in the UK's consumption of alcohol per head for 50 years and, according to the Institute of Alcohol Studies, we now drink twice as much as we did in 1950.

In young women aged 16-24, the proportion exceeding the sensible weekly limit more than doubled, from 15% in 1988 to 33% in 2003, say government figures.

Although our young people are among the biggest boozers in Europe, overall we still do not drink as much as the French (see last section), but we do so in a different way.

"It's about the pattern of consumption," says Dr Aisha Holloway, chairman of the Nursing Council on Alcohol. "If the French are consuming at a more even consumption level, maybe two or three units every day, then that is better for you than going out and drinking 28 to 30 units at the weekend."

The exact impact of alcohol abuse is hard to measure but a government report in 2003 put the figure at £20bn annually, including the health service, policing and the economy.

ARE YOUNG PEOPLE BINGE DRINKING MORE?

There are difficulties in defining "binge drinking". Drinking to get drunk is one interpretation, but some drunkenness is achieved without intent.

Twice the daily consumption (eight units for men, six for women) is the most common definition, but does this apply to a day-long or a two-hour session, for a big or small person?

Using the quantity definition, binge drinking seems to diminish with age. It accounts for 40% of all drinking occasions by men and 22% by women, according to Alcohol Concern.

It would be misleading to say it was on the increase across all ages.

Office of National Statistics figures suggest that between 1998 and 2003 it fell among men by 3% and rose among women by 2%. But it is the increase among young people and its visible consequences on the night-time streets that makes the headlines.

ARE THE DEFINITIONS CONTROVERSIAL?

Plenty of people believe the definitions of binge drinking are misleading. They say that just because they enjoy a few glasses of wine or four pints, they should not be categorised with the anti-social drinkers who vomit or brawl in the street.

Dr Aisha Holloway, chairman of the Nursing Council on Alcohol, has some sympathy with this view.

"Perhaps we should stop calling it binge drinking and just educate people about what is healthy consumption and what is going to place you at risk of x, y or z," she says.

"Binge drinking is associated with a type of anti-social behaviour but in truth, people can binge drink at home."

IS CONSUMPTION RELATED TO SUPPLY?

This is the key political question as the relaxed licensing laws come into force.

Setting aside the arguments about public disorder and attempts by the Licensing Bill, which comes into effect next week, to tackle that, the government says later closing hours could eventually reduce consumption by stopping people rushing to finish their drinks by 11pm.

"This is a committed and coherent effort to promote responsible drinking in this country," says Home Secretary Charles Clarke.

Ministers point to more liberal laws in parts of Europe as evidence of how late licensing can encourage people not to binge.

They could also use their opponents' efforts to help their case. In 1988 the Conservative government was warned that their plans to allow pubs to remain open all day would lead to more drunkenness and more disorder. But alcohol consumption per capita fell every year for five years after the legislation was passed.

Today, opposition politicians and alcohol campaigners believe increased supply simply means more drinking, and say the unique British drinking culture makes comparisons meaningless.

Researchers at the University of the West of England concluded that reforms to relax licensing laws in Australia, Iceland and Ireland increased disorder.

WHAT ARE THE OTHER FACTORS?

People drink because it's fun, but the reasons given for the particularly high levels of drinking by some young people vary depending on who you talk to

Andrew McNeil, director of the Institute of Alcohol Studies, thinks a major factor in high consumption among young people is the affordability of alcohol, which has increased over the years. Alcohol was 49% more affordable in 2000, than 1978, according to Downing Street's Strategy Unit.

When excise duty has increased, consumption has fallen, says Mr McNeil, so linking excise duty to income growth and tackling price discounts would help.

But Cary Cooper, professor of organisational psychology and health at Lancaster University Management School, thinks social and economic forces are more influential.

Among 20-somethings, increased disposable income, with most young people unable to afford a home, and the importance of the peer group as a surrogate family are key factors.

"Younger and younger people are identifying with their peer group as their family group," he says. "And drinking becomes a badge of courage."

Teenagers drink to escape their own pressures, such as academic expectations and financial strain, he adds.

HOW MANY PUBS WILL BE OPEN LATER?

It does not look like there will be a rush of 24-hour pubs opening next week.

About 70% of the 81,000 pubs in England and Wales have applied to change their licenses, mostly to stay open for an extra hour or two at weekends.

Some, like the politicians' favourite, The Red Lion in Westminster, have been unsuccessful.

But this isn't just about pubs, and out of the 160,000 licensed premises as a whole, only a fraction have asked for a 24-hour licence. They include about 160 pubs and bars, about 100 restaurants and hotels and 300 Tesco stores.

Even among those 160 pubs, it is thought some of them will only exercise the right on special occasions.

A spokesman for the Beer and Pub Association said: "Flexibility is the main reason for applying. If there's a sporting event on the other side of the world, say the World Cup in New Zealand that they are screening, then they can open up rather than apply for a one-off licence."

DOES THE REST OF EUROPE REALLY DRINK LESS THAN US?

No, France and several other countries drink more alcohol per head.

Historically the heaviest drinking countries were the wine producers. For many years, France had one of the highest known levels of alcohol consumption but it has recently stabilised.

In the latest figures supplied by the Institute of Alcohol Studies, the UK's alcohol consumption per capita ranked it ninth among selected countries, behind France, but ahead of Australia (23rd) and the US (26th).

However, if present trends continue, the UK will overtake France in a couple of years.

And already the UK's teenagers drink more heavily than nearly all their counterparts across Europe.

A Datamonitor report found that UK women under 25 drink more than their European counterparts, and by 2009, it's expected to rise another 31% to three times as much as young women in France and Italy.

BBC NEWS ~ 2005/11/17

Thursday, November 17, 2005

Alcoholic drinks linked to mouth cancer rise

Rising alcohol consumption in the UK is contributing to a sharp increase in mouth cancer cases, warns cancer charity, adding more pressure on firms to actively promote responsible drinking.

Smoking and drinking together are thought to cause more than three quarters of mouth cancer cases in developed countries, according to Cancer Research UK, Britain’s biggest cancer charity.

The group, which has just launched a three-year mouth cancer awareness campaign funded by the Department of Health, warned that only one in five people it surveyed linked alcohol with mouth cancer.

Yet, Britons drink twice as much alcohol as they did 50 years ago, an average 8.6 litres of pure alcohol each every year, and diagnosed mouth cancer cases rose by a quarter between 1992 and 2001.

The disease now kills more people than cervical and testicular cancer put together.

Professor Alex Markham, chief executive at Cancer Research UK, said rising alcohol intake was a direct cause. “The recent rise in mouth cancer cases appears to be one of the unfortunate outcomes of excessive drinking in this country.”

The charity’s new campaign, called ‘Open Up to Mouth Cancer’, aims to make more people aware of the risks.

The move puts more pressure on drinks producers to show they are actively promoting responsible drinking amid widespread concern over binge drinking and government plans to relax licence laws next week.

Claims that smoking and drinking together increase the risk of cancer also puts the drinks industry in a difficult position over its opposition to an all-out smoking ban in pubs.

Sara Hiom, head of health information at Cancer Research, pressed the point: “At least three quarters of mouth cancers could be prevented by stopping smoking and reducing alcohol intake.”

The drinks industry’s self-regulatory body, the Portman Group, has taken a lead by helping to run anti-binge drinking adverts and set up Drinkaware, a website devoted to responsible drinking.

UK drinking habits, however, are still increasing, despite consumption declines in France and Germany. Young adults, aged 18-25yrs, are expected to be drinking 14 per cent more alcohol by 2009, according to market research group Datamonitor.

British women aged 18-25 already drink way more alcohol than their European counterparts, notching up 291 litres per year compared to the 216-litre European average. German women came second with 200 litres per year.

beveragedaily ~ 16/11/2005

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Large Study Underscores Detrimental Effect of Alcohol on HCV

Doctors have confirmed that consuming alcohol can have a detrimental impact on the course of hepatitis C.1

The researchers, from Glasgow, Scotland and the University of Cambridge, performed an analysis of nearly two dozen previous studies involving more than 15,000 people with hepatitis C (HCV) to determine how much faster the viral infection can spread in those who drink alcohol.

Questions Remain
Several previous studies have reported a higher risk of further HCV progression in those who consume alcoholic drinks, wrote Dr. Sharon Hutchinson of Health Protection Scotland, part of the UK's National Health Service, and her colleagues. However, other research has failed to link heavy alcohol consumption with severe HCV infection, which can lead to liver cirrhosis. This study, therefore, was an attempt to clarify the possible association, and to find out how advanced HCV can become after consuming alcoholic beverages.

Determining which factors speed up the course of HCV is essential "to counsel those affected and help make decisions regarding antiviral therapy," Hutchinson and her team wrote.

Pooled Analysis Performed
For this analysis, the researchers pulled information on 20 previous studies, which had taken place in several countries.

Of all the patients who had taken part in these studies, 18 percent, collectively, progressed to advanced liver disease—cirrhosis, advanced fibrosis or liver cancer—after consuming alcohol. About one-fifth of these patients were defined as heavy alcohol users, consuming between 210 grams to 560 grams (about 7.4 ounces to about 19.8 ounces) per week.

In half the studies analyzed, the risk of contracting advanced hepatitis C infection from heavy alcohol use ranged from one-and-a-half times higher to nearly 12 times more, compared to those who drank little or no alcohol. In the other studies, a significant association between heavy alcohol consumption and the development of severe HCV infection could not be found.

However, after combining the results from all of these studies, even taking the lack of a risk found in some of them into account, Hutchinson and her associates concluded that the risk of developing aggressive HCV infection after heavy alcohol use is more than twice as high as for those who consume little or no alcohol.

Higher Risk for Men
In their meta-analysis (analysis of many studies), the researchers also found that men had a slightly higher risk of developing advanced liver disease from heavy alcoholic consumption compared to women.

"Excess alcohol consumption is likely to result in more severe [liver] injury, promoting pathologic progression to cirrhosis among patients with chronic HCV," the study team wrote after reviewing their findings.

Study Limits
There were some drawbacks to this study, Hutchinson and her colleagues acknowledged. For instance, information on alcohol consumption was collected from the patients themselves, and they may not have recalled exactly how much they had consumed in the past. In addition, the definition of "heavy" alcohol use widely varied in the previous studies analyzed (210 grams to 560 grams per week), "and so the true threshold above which alcohol accelerates HCV disease progression remains uncertain," the researchers wrote.

As a result of these limitations," the role of alcohol in HCV-related cirrhosis might be underestimated," Hutchinson's group wrote. "Nevertheless, the evidence overwhelmingly shows a worsened outcome for those with chronic HCV and concurrent alcohol use."

The investigators added that the amount of alcohol that is safe to consume for those with hepatitis C infection "is unclear" and thus, "alcohol consumption should be minimized as much as possible in those who have chronic HCV until a safe threshold is more definitively determined."

1. Hutchinson SJ, Bird, SM, Goldberg DJ. Influence of alcohol on the progression of hepatitis C virus infection: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005 Nov;3(11):1150-9.

Hepatitis Neighborhood ~ 11-15-05 ~ by John C. Martin

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

No Pubs want 24-hour Licence

Pubs aim for longer opening hours.. but NONE to serve booze for 24hrs

Not one pub in the UK will serve alcohol around the clock when 24-hour licensing laws start this month.

Most publicans have opted to keep serving for an extra hour or two at night and open early for the breakfast trade.

Some 80,000 pubs, clubs, hotels and shops - 40 per cent of the total - have applied for longer hours.

Half the applications have been opposed by residents and police amid alarm at binge-drinking.

Today, Cabinet ministers will launch a £150,000 advertising campaign warning of a crackdown on drunken yobs.

Home Secretary Charles Clarke and Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell will unveil police powers to shut rowdy pubs and punish shops which sell to underage drinkers.

Advertisement

But industry experts said the Mirror findings prove that fears the new laws will fuel binge-drinking are unfounded.

The Government confirmed that only about 160 pubs, 75 clubs and 110 hotels have been given the go-ahead to open 24 hours a day.

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport said: "It is highly unlikely a single drinking establishment will be open 24 hours. It is not economically viable."

With nine days to go until the new laws come into effect, pub operators said they have no desire to stay open around the clock.

Mark Jones, chief executive of the Yates Group, said: "We won't apply for any licence that extends opening to 24 hours."

The first pub granted a 24-hour licence, The Swan Tavern in London's financial district, will use the extended time on special occasions, such as the Budget and major sporting events.

Landlord Adam Pattinson said: "We will probably only use it a handful of times in a year."

In Manchester, the first establishment granted a 24-hour drinking licence was... an arty cinema.

Cornerhouse manager Shelley Brown said: "We may open until midnight to let people who see a late film have a drink afterwards."

David Sheen, of the British Beer and Pub Association, said it estimated only 20 pubs have 24-hour licences and "we don't know of a single pub in the country that will be open for 24 hours a day.

"Most are opting for modest increases in opening hours."

The association's chief executive Rob Hayward said: "Every New Year's Eve for the last three years flexible hours have been tried and tested. The result has been less disorder and fewer problems than on the average Friday night."

Daniel Pearce, of trade magazine The Publican, said: "This belies the whole hysteria about 24-hour drinking and violence.

"Contrary to popular belief, this will dilute the potential for trouble simply because people will leave pubs at different times."

Mirror ~ 15 November 2005

First the folly, now the panic

They ignored the police. They wouldn't listen to the judiciary. They brushed aside the concerns of doctors, churches and the wider public. As always, Ministers arrogantly thought they knew best.

Nothing - but nothing - could be allowed to stop their reckless rush to introduce round-the-clock drinking, which they assured us would usher in a continental-style cafe culture of civilised restraint.

Now, when it is too late, the whiff of panic in the air. Now comes a frantic scramble to mitigate the damage when this 'reform' comes into effect next week.

Today, police launch their biggest-ever crackdown on binge drinking.

The exercise is supported by a truly repulsive poster showing a pavement splattered with vomit, arranged to represent the £80 fine drunks will have to pay. But why should any of this work, in an alcoholic free-for-all?

Meanwhile, Ministers continue their pitiful pretence that all will be well, urging councils to 'start the process of delivering a real change in attitudes and practice around alcohol-fuelled disorder'.

Some hope. The scale of this Government's misjudgment is already apparent in the unexpectedly large number of 24-hour drinking licences.

Ministers glibly claimed only a 'handful' of pubs and clubs would open round the clock. But at least 700 such licences have been approved. And that is to say nothing of the thousands of pubs and clubs given extensions into the small hours.

No, you don't need a crystal ball to predict what this 'reform' will do. Just examine what happened over this Government's equally crass encouragement of gambling.

Though frustrated in their attempt to foist giant casinos on every high street - with opposition led by this paper - Ministers still go out of their way to help the moguls of the gaming industry.

With 17 new casinos opening by 2009 and another 40 in the pipeline, they seem so anxious to promote gambling that they have just scrapped the law requiring punters to register before joining a casino.

The result? Surprise, surprise, a surge in gambling in recent weeks - this when gambling addiction is at record levels.

We can expect worse when 24-hour drinking comes in. Police fear mayhem on the streets. Judges warn of more rapes and other violent crimes. Law-abiding communities are braced for more misery.

And a Government that never listens or learns and never thinks things through adds insult to injury, with a 'crackdown' to stave off a disaster of its own making.

Daily Mail ~ 15/11/05

Crackdown on under-age drinkers

A Christmas crackdown on under-age drinking is being launched amid concern over new licensing laws.

Pub and shop managers face seasonal sting operations that coincide with the end of the compulsory 11pm closing time.

Critics fear the change will fuel binge-drinking when it comes into force across England and Wales on November 24. Conservatives are fighting to delay the reform in the House of Lords.

Ministers insist the move will encourage a continental-style cafe culture rather than round-the-clock-drinking, and pubs minister James Purnell predicted only a handful of pubs would apply for 24-hour licences.

However, a survey for the Independent showed at least 160 pubs were among 546 venues and shops that have already been granted the licences.

The Government is keen to counter suggestions the reform might encourage violence and disorder by stressing that new powers have been given to police and local authorities to deal with the problem.

Home Secretary Charles Clarke will launch the latest stage of an alcohol enforcement campaign on Tuesday. Mr Clarke and Cabinet colleagues have written to police and local authority leaders ahead of the launch reminding them of the existing and new powers.

The Home Secretary highlights the use of "test purchase", or sting operations, "to send a strong and visible message to premises suspected of fuelling alcohol-related disorder".

A spokeswoman for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, which is overseeing the changes, said there would be a "Christmas crackdown".

The spokeswoman also said the newspaper survey suggested that less than one in 200 premises would be granted 24-hour licences, insisting: "In the case of pubs and bars, indications from the trade are that many of those with 24-hour licences merely want the flexibility to use them on special occasions - for example to show sporting events on the other side of the world. They don't intend to make it a regular occurrence."

Daily Mail ~ 14/11/05

Monday, November 14, 2005

24-hour drinking plan 'to go ahead'

A major relaxation of the licensing laws, which paves the way for 24-hour drinking, will go ahead as planned, the Government insisted last night.

The Department of Culture, Media and Sports (DCMS) said an attempt by Conservative peers to delay implementation of the Licensing Act 2003 until next June would cause chaos in the run-up to Christmas and threaten thousands of livelihoods.

The new legislation is due to come into force on Nov 24 but the Tories say extending opening hours is dangerous when Britain is in the grip of a binge-drinking culture.

Theresa May, shadow culture secretary, said: "Daily, we discover fresh reasons why it is crazy for the Government to press ahead in just two weeks time. This week's news that as many as one in 10 premises might be trading illegally without a licence is yet another."

Mrs May was referring to a warning from the British Beer and Pub Association that thousands of pubs may be forced to open "illegally" on Nov 24 because they have not received their new licence.

She added: "We hope the House of Lords will send a very clear message to the Prime Minister that he should at the very least postpone the new drinking hours until we can get a grip on binge drinking and alcohol-fuelled violence."

Conservative peers have tabled a motion demanding that implementation of the Act be postponed for six months. The Act is debated in the Lords today.

But a government spokesman said: "A delay would deny police tougher powers to deal with drunken disorder. It would deny pubs a more effective voice in licensing decisions that affect them and it would mean the continuation of an unjust 90-year-old curfew that punished the responsible majority for the sins of an irresponsible minority."

Telegraph ~ 14/11/2005

Sunday, November 13, 2005

There was only one conceivable route: total abstinence

After David Bryce quit heroin, he knew the difficulties of staying clean. He also knew the miseries which go hand in hand with drug abuse – the stealing, the mugging, the dealing, the sheer desperation. So he decided to help others kick the habit. This was his only weapon

Alan Taylor talks to the man behind Calton Athletic

DAVID Bryce – Davie to his many mates – has a mantra : “Take me if you can, but leave my men alone.” He learned it, he recalls, when he was a very young boy, growing up in Glasgow’s Gallowgate in the 1950s. It comes from the movie Rob Roy, starring Richard Todd in a kilt. As the Redcoats attempt to capture him, Rob Roy confronts them with his claymore and defiantly utters the immortal words.

“There was something about what he said that sank in,” writes Bryce in Alive And Kicking, his memoir, “and it was to have a big impact on my life. It was to be my motto and code of honour as boy and man, growing up in the east end of Glasgow. These words would stay with me as a member of Glasgow’s most famous gang, the Calton Tongs, and even more so when I went on to set up Calton Athletic. I still live by them today. You can take me on, but lay off my people at Calton Athletic.”

Bryce is an unlikely looking Rob Roy. For a start, he does not – at least in daylight hours – wear a kilt. Furthermore, his accent is undiluted Glaswegian. At 56, he looks fitter than he deserves to be, light on his feet and without an ounce of excess fat . We meet at Morrison’s “state of the art” gym in Glasgow’s Swanston Street, a narrow, low, prefabricated building engulfed by warehouses. A couple of days ago, Frank Bruno dropped by . “Hauns like frying pans,” according to one observer. Adjacent to the gym is a café whose forte is all-day breakfasts, which Bryce decides is what he needs before lifting weights. As we talk he tackles a heart attack on a plate . Though he has spent several spells in intensive care, he is clearly a man who likes to live dangerously.

By his own account, Bryce’s life did not click into gear until he was 35, which is when he started Calton Athletic, a football team comprised entirely of recovering drug addicts. Up until that point, Bryce seemed destined to die young . At 11, he started to smoke. Two years later, he was caught robbing a bookie’s house, for which he received two years’ probation. By now, he was a member of the infamous Tongs, which tyrannised the east end in the early 1960s. Already, drink had begun to figure in his destiny. At 15, he was en route to a remand home and approved school, from which he did a runner. He headed straight for the Gallowgate and was soon re-arrested, “pissed out of my mind”, whereupon he spent seven weeks in the Bar-L (Barlinnie). The next 12 years passed in a haze of violence, drugs, drink and prison. “As the drinking got more serious,” he says, “the crimes got worse, so the booze took me straight back to prison. I missed every Christmas bar one from 15 to 21 because I was inside.”

When Bryce drank, he didn’t know when to stop . He had blackouts and forgot everything that had happened, which was probably just as well. On top of this, “relationship after relationship would die a death”. At one time he looked so bad his mother didn’t recognise him, and a police charge-sheet recorded him as of “no fixed abode” . “When your mother won’t even say you can stay with her, you know you’ve got problems.” However, it was the spur to make him take control of his own life. The booze had to go otherwise he’d be a dead man. He checked into Gartloch Hospital – “I had ended up one of the ‘loonies’. I had been one for a long time, but only realised it now” – and joined Alcoholics Anonymous.

Alcohol, though, was merely one ingredient in the cocktail of his addictions. In prison, he’d been introduced to amphetamines. Later, he smoked dope and popped pills. Then, in 1977, he made the acquaintance of heroin. He asked the dealer if it was addictive. “Don’t be stupid,” he was told. “We wouldn’t be taking it if it was.” Soon he was paying £100 a day “to feel normal”. For the next three years, he travelled far and wide in order to get a fix and “earn” the money for it. Crime sustained his habit. He was, he acknowledges, a full-blown junkie with an addictive personality. “Jeanette [his wife] says the only thing I do in moderation is sex.”

What saved him, and thousands of addicts who have been through Calton Athletic’s books, was the will to kick the habit. Bryce, talking 19 to the dozen and with obsessive intensity, is a man possessed. If you want to change, he says, you must first acknowledge your addiction. Then you must give up all drugs. Like other addicts, he was prescribed methadone, which it was believed would prevent the use of infected needles and stop the spread of Aids. Instead of being weaned off drugs, he was hooked again. “Don’t believe the f***ing propaganda that methadone doesn’t affect you,” he says. “It’s second only to heroin in addictive qualities. And because they’re addicts, they’ll be taking valium and everything else. I know people who’ve been killed driving while on methadone.” Giving an addict methadone, he adds, is like swapping vodka for whisky .

For Bryce, there was only one conceivable route: total abstinence. Through AA he managed to stop drinking, which in turn helped him give up drugs. Drink and drugs, he insists, are inextricably linked; the one gives succour to the other. In 1983, he started Calton Narcotics Anonymous, employing the same principles that had proved successful for him personally. It was a time, he recalls, when the east end was “awash” with heroin. In Glasgow, there were 10,000 injecting addicts. Inspired by a new rehabilitation centre at Cardross, where one recovering addict helped another, he came up with the idea of Calton Athletic, a football team made of recovering addicts.

“Most folk,” he acknowledges, spearing a baked bean, “laughed and said, ‘See the junkie team? They’ll probably needle ye.’” Bryce, however, was deadly serious. With his “take me if you can, but leave my men alone” mantra ringing in his head, he took to packing a baseball bat in order to deal with any mickey-takers. Calton Athletic, he says, was all about camaraderie, discipline, getting fit and showing commitment. Anyone who fell off the wagon was told to take a hike. Bryce was not going to allow one bad apple to infect the rest of the barrel. Either you were in under his terms or you were red carded.

It is a controversial, uncompromising tactic but Bryce makes no apologies for it. On the contrary, he is intemperate in his criticism of politically correct, touchy-feely agencies. “Everyone else in the drugs field is non-judgmental and non-directive ,” he says. “That’s fine if you’re dealing with the blind, the deaf and the handicapped. If you take that approach with drug addicts, they’ll have your guts for garters.”

it was not long before word of Calton Athletic seeped out of the Gallowgate. The catalyst for its international fame, however, was an unlikely source. Gordon Brown, then merely an opposition MP, wrote an article about the club in the Observer. After reading it, Lenny Henry got in touch wanting to make a film. Alive And Kicking duly appeared, albeit transferred to the Midlands because Henry could not master a Glasgow accent. In a monstrous leap of the imagination, Robbie Coltrane played Bryce, “sticking the heid on people left, right and centre”. Bryce protests this was “artistic licence”; I’m not convinced. Calton Athletic was also instrumental in the success of Trainspotting, helping director Danny Boyle and actor Ewan McGregor transfer Irvine Welsh’s novel to the screen.

For Bryce, it was an opportunity to show the unglamorous reality of drugs. How? “It highlighted the HIV issue. The last one in the film to start injecting was the first to get the virus. These sorts of things happen; I’ve seen it . The film also vividly illustrated the cot death of the baby of two of the drug-addicts. If you look at cot death statistics, a high percentage are children of at least one drug-addict. It also exposed the methadone myth. When Renton is going through his withdrawals , he pleads with his parents, ‘Please, get me some methadone,’ and they refuse. ‘No, methadone didn’t work the last time.’ They are right, methadone doesn’t work. It’s not the cure if you want to come off drugs. At the end of the film the characters were still ripping each other off. That’s addicts for you.”

Bryce argues his case in the knowledge that he and Calton Athletic have become increasingly isolated in the war against drugs. At the height of Calton Athletic’s fame, it had 28 full-time staff. Today there are none; only voluntary workers. Bryce attributes the withdrawal of funding to his participation in Scotland Against Drugs, the government-backed agency which at that stage – like most other organisations in the field – preached the doctrine of “harm-reduction”, ie prescribing methadone.

Bryce joined SAD at a time when it was struggling badly with credibility. Though sceptical, he allowed himself to be wooed. What he had not bargained for was the degree of hostility directed at SAD and everyone associated with it, including Sir Tom Farmer, of whom Bryce does not have the happiest of memories. At the 1996 Calton Athletics annual dance and awards ceremony, Farmer spontaneously announced he would sponsor Calton Athletic, so moved was he by its work. “Everybody,” notes Bryce, “was gobsmacked and delighted.” But nothing materialised. “Not a bean. The only explanation I can give is that he must have got carried away with the emotion of the ceremony. Then, when he went into the SAD office on Monday, his advisers probably told him, ‘You can’t do that with Calton Athletic. Everybody else will be upset’.”

BRYCE is particularly critical of the role played in SAD by Jack Irvine of the PR company Media House and a former Scottish Sun editor. Irvine, he says, had been referring to him and his Calton Athletic associates as “the boys from the Gallowgate without an O Level between them”. Friends in the media “marked my card” and he confronted Irvine before a meeting. Any more, he told him, and there would be hell to pay. Irvine responded by pointing his finger at him. “If you don’t put that right doon,” Bryce said, “I’ll bite it right aff yi.”

It was the end of his association with SAD and the beginning, he says, of a vindictive whispering campaign against Calton Athletic, which had always attracted as many celebrities as it did controversy. Bryce’s book contains photographs showing him and other members posing with the likes of Barbara Windsor, Martin McGuinness and Robbie Williams. Fundraising matches featured football legends, movie stars and media pundits. Pointedly, Bryce notes that while Calton Athletic was largely uncelebrated by official bodies in Scotland, the opposite was the case in London. In 1991, he received the Whitbread Award for Community Involvement and five years later he was nominated for the Unsung Hero Award by the Celebrities Guild of the UK.

Ironically, or perhaps inevitably, the latter coincided with the deterioration of Calton Athletic’s relationship with statutory bodies in Glasgow. “Success breeds success,” writes Bryce, “but it also breeds an awful lot of resentment. Our programmes were built on self-generated sources, which only increased envy and resentment.” The book’s chapter headings chronicle the history: Fallout, Blacklisted, Backstabbing, Shame and Blame. On a 1998 trip to the World Cup finals in France, the Sunday Mail ran a story headlined Junkie Junket, which was twisted to make it look as if the taxpayer was footing the bill. In fact, the entire cost had been raised by Calton Athletic members. Bryce lays the blame squarely at the door of rival agencies .

In the meantime, Bryce came under enormous personal strain. Within a few years, a nephew, his three sisters and his mother died. Was he ever tempted to seek solace in drink or drugs? “Never,” he says emphatically. “There’s nae reason for me to go back to them days.” He says he owes it to himself, his family and Calton Athletic not to relapse. And he doesn’t want to give his enemies the satisfaction of watching him fall from grace. On top of which: “It would have been a slap in the face to my mother and sisters if I had been drunk at their funerals. I had to handle it with dignity. It didn’t mean I was not hurting. It was hell, but Jeanette was tremendous.”

All of which, however, took its toll on his own health. So consumed was he with Calton Athletic that he’d been neglecting himself physically. When Irvine Welsh met him a few years ago to discuss his book, he feared the worst. Like his sister Ann, Bryce suffered from emphysema. “I wasn’t feeling too clever,” he admits. “At that stage I really believed I was dying. I went to see a consultant and had a biopsy and everything. I told a pal that if I got the right news from the consultant, I’d concentrate on looking after myself. I got the right news and I’ve stuck to it.”

Four years ago, he joined Morrison’s gym and goes there at least three times a week, having stopped smoking after 40 years. He is still director of Calton Athletic Recovery Group and recently helped organise its 20th anniversary dance . Though scaled down, Calton Athletic’s work continues, much as when it was originally conceived, but with considerably more awareness of the problems it faces. According to its records, some 3500 people, one in three of them women, have been weaned off drink and drugs because of the zero tolerance approach: a success rate, Bryce boasts, other agencies can only dream of. He himself has been alcohol-free for 28 years and hasn’t taken drugs for 23 years.

It is testimony to his extraordinary self-discipline. Alas, it is not mirrored elsewhere. He reckons the situation in Glasgow is worse now than when Calton Athletic started. Heroin is no longer the drug of choice; cocaine is king. “There’s four times the number of people using it.” It is a drum he has been beating to an audience wearing ear-plugs. Methadone is still prescribed to addicts with minimal recovery rates. In the meantime, says Davie Bryce, an entire generation of young people has been lost, as it was in the two world wars. It is a national tragedy with no end in sight.

Sunday Herald - 13 November 2005

Saturday, November 12, 2005

Alcoholics Anonymous meet

Surat: A three-day national fellowship meeting of the Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) would be held for the first time in
Surat.

Members from 20 cities across the country would participate in the conference, which will be held at Madhav Vanik ni
Wadi near the railway station, on Friday.

The participants will exchang views and make plans to increase memberships in their respective inter groups. One of the
many suggestions floated by the Surat body was to form a new 'women's inter group' for the city.

The reason for holding the thirty-sixth fellowship of the 'AA' in Surat, according to members, is because the city formed
the first 'AA' fellowship in Gujarat and has the maximum number of members when compared to Vadodara and
Ahmedabad.

While Surat boasts of 150 members, Vadodara has registered 50 and Ahmedabad has the least, with just 10 members.
The members are also working on the feasibility of the formation of a special women's inter group in the city, on the lines
of Pune and Delhi.

"Right now, we have just four women members in Surat, we would like to increase the memberships. "Besides, we have
networked with the rehabilitation centres in the city that regularly refer cases to us.

Our meetings are held at the Nanpura Catholic Church in Surat on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Sundays of every week,"
says Dinesh, a member of the 'AA'.

Besides, members would also discuss the possibility of forming corporate groups like in Pune and Mumbai, where
corporate houses recommend members to this forum.

"We have specific inter groups that have been recommended by corporate houses and we run special programmes for
them too," says public information chairman of AA, Satish.

Apart from Surat, Ahmedabad and Vadodara, the AA has fellowship meetings in Navsari, Vapi, Valsad, Silvasa and
Daman. "One of the many benefits of being part of AA is that a person enjoys complete anonymity.

At the personal level, anonymity provides protection for all members from identification as alcoholics, a safeguard often
of special importance to newcomers.

While speaking in non-AA meetings, members usually use first names and use last names in AA fellowship meetings. It
is expected of other members in the group to maintain complete anonymity of their group," adds Dinesh.

But how does the AA help an alcoholic? "This is done through the example and friendship of the recovered alcoholics at
AA. New members are encouraged to stay away from a drink a day, instead of swearing off "forever".

This is done by helping the members talk about their worries and offer emotional support to them," says another member
Ranjith.

The Times of India Online ~ Thursday, November 10, 2005

UK Boozers are off their Trolley

Cheap store booze fuels binge-drinking. Cheap supermarket beer is fuelling the binge-drinking culture sweeping the nation, new research reveals.

A store price war has seen the cost of lager drop to a 20-year low and experts believe revellers are loading up on knock-down strong booze before going to the pub.

A litre of standard lager in shops such as Tesco and Asda has plummeted from £1.24 to £1.18 since 1995.

Strong brews like Stella Artois are down 24p from £2.01 to £1.77. Daniel Davies of the Confederation of Professional Licensees, which carried out the research, said: "The problem of binge-drinking is not just about pubs and clubs opening longer.

"Supermarkets and off-licences selling lager and alcopops cheaply are a large part of the reason why people are getting drunker quicker.

"They are pre-loading with alcohol before they go out. It is more cost-effective. You can drink a bottle of strong lager from a supermarket for 40p. In a pub it costs £2.50."

Advertisement

Real Ale campaign group Camra claimed cheap shop booze is hitting landlords - with the amount of beer drunk in pubs falling from 72 per cent to 60 per cent since 1995.

A spokesman said: "Supermarkets that discount cans of lager have played their part in people turning their backs on pubs."

Almost half of stores sell booze to under-18s, according to the results of a police-backed sting operation released this month.

The new Licensing Act will toughen up the law on sales to children. Supermarkets and pubs could lose their licence if caught.

The Mirror ~ 1 November 2005 ~ By Bob Roberts

Friday, November 11, 2005

Boozing session led to assault on partner

An Alcoholic who suffers from severe depression and dyslexia assaulted his partner before jumping into bed and falling asleep, a court heard.

Michael Dave Nicholls pleaded guilty to assaulting his partner of 10 years but blamed the incident on his excessive drinking.

The 48-year-old, of Roffey Close, Horley, appeared before Redhill magistrates last Thursday.

Andrew Stephens, prosecuting, said that the defendant was at home with his partner and his nephew when the incident happened.

He added: "The defendant is an alcoholic and had drunk a two or three-litre bottle of cider.

"His partner told police that the defendant became angry after an argument but she couldn't remember what it was about. She said that they usually argue about how much he drinks because she doesn't want him to harm himself."

The court heard that the defendant grabbed his partner's arm and pushed it up behind her back. The victim asked him to stop because it was hurting before he went straight to bed and fell asleep.

Mr Stephens said: "The victim waited for the police to arrive. She had bruising to her right hand and arm and had pain in her shoulder.

"In interview the defendant admitted he is an alcoholic. They had drunk cider and ate pizzas while watching television.

"The defendant denied there was an assault and suggested that she had lied to the police.

"Previously he had a good character and has no convictions recorded against him."

Rodney Bruce, defending, said that the incident came about after the trio had been drinking.

He said: "The defendant wasn't the only one who had been drinking. It was fuelled by alcohol.

"Up until last year he was employed as a cleaner for most of his life. He has now been signed off and receives incapacity benefit."

Chairman of the bench Paul Ryder said he was encouraged to hear that the defendant was going to address his problems.

He said: "We can't condone this kind of incident at all. We are encouraged you are going to your GP to do something about it.

"Go away and prove that what your lawyer has said on your behalf you can do and let's not hear about any more incidents like this."

Nicholls was given a 12-month conditional dis-charge and ordered to pay £55 towards court costs.

ic SurreyOnline ~ Nov 10 2005

Thursday, November 10, 2005

1 in 3 adults asked to buy drink by kids

Adults are often pestered to buy drink for youths in off-sales. One in three adults has been asked to buy booze for kids, it was claimed today.

But many say they did not even realise what they were doing is against the the law.

A UK-wide survey carried out for the Portman Group, which promotes responsible drinking, has found that as many as 32% of adults had been approached, often by kids who gather outside off-licences to pester adults to buy alcohol for them.

Of those asked by kids, more than a third admitted to buying drink for them.

Purchasing alcohol for minors is an offence, yet many of the adults questioned said they did not realise this.

Others said they felt intimidated, while some said they did not think it would do any harm.

Strathclyde Police targets undera